View Single Post
Old 04-08-2015, 11:26 AM   #11
no1udknow
Registered User
 
no1udknow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Sacramento,California
Posts: 696
Re: outback fuel tank options...

Davepl, I get what you are saying. But fuel tank and fuel cell tecnology has become a lot better since many of these were first made. I also think that if you look at the rear ended vehicles you described, they all had one thing in common, pinto, nova, crown vic, none of them have ladder style frames like a truck. the crown victoria had 2 frame rails, but lacked lateral braces, most of the structural integrity comes from the unibody, the nova and pinto have no frame to speak of in the rear as they are sub framed cars. If someone rear ends my truck, the impact is likely going directly into the ends of the frame rails and will shove the whole truck forward, the lateral braces on both the front and rear of the fuel tank should hinder buckling which is what would likely puncture it, and it is lowered, so unless I get hit by a bumper dragging sports car, I don't see much of a chance of anyone getting underneath it. I have thought over the rear end scenario many times before deciding on this, I also considered saddle tanks, but I remembered the old stories from the 80's chevy pickups being t-boned and becoming fireballs, which incited fuel cell technology available today. I feel safer with it under the bed...... I just won't let my wife drive ;-)
__________________
Built not bought!
My dad always tried to convince me HEI was pointless!
Welding is a lot like sex, you don't have to be great with the rod as long as you thoroughly prep the surface and your good at grinding
My build : 68 C10 Short Bed Conversion
no1udknow is offline   Reply With Quote