View Single Post
Old 12-16-2019, 09:09 AM   #10
Grumpy old man
Senior Member
 
Grumpy old man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Gods country East,Tn
Posts: 8,545
Re: Flywheel size vs Bellhousing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike C View Post
From a performance standpoint, the motor mounted in the 6 cylinder position should have a pretty significant effect on weight distribution with it mounted much further to the rear and lower. It also allows for EASY routing of the 2 1/2” performance straight dump repo Corvette exhaust manifold piping. Both of which I would choose for a street truck.
In the correct V8 position there is plenty of room for 2 1/2" straight dump rams horn manifolds even with manual clutch linkage and by tucking the exhaust thru thr rear cross member cleans up the bottom of the truck along with a rear mounted fuel tank to help with weight distribution .

the wheel base of a 67 short bed and a 67 Chevelle are both 115" and the weight for both is in the 33-3400 lb range giving a drop on the truck and other mods they should be very close performance wise .
Attached Images
     
__________________

1967 Factory short bed - Old school
'71 - 350 / 4bolt / 487 heads / Edelbrock C3BX
Muncie M-22 4 speed / Hurst Comp plus
Factory 12 bolt posi 3.73 / 255-70-15
Smoothed firewall / Factory cowl induction
Power disc brakes / power steering / 3.5-5" drop

Last edited by Grumpy old man; 12-16-2019 at 09:17 AM.
Grumpy old man is offline   Reply With Quote