Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
03-29-2008, 02:08 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 1,317
|
73 crossmember on a 1950
Somewhere (H.A.M.B.?) I read a article about using a 73-87 crossmember on the 1950 1/2 ton using only 1/2 inch spacers for frame fit.It seems it is wider but can be corrected with backspacing rims.
Anybody done this? I happen to have access to a free 77 1/2 ton 2wd that is just sitting. |
03-29-2008, 06:13 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cactus Patch So. Az
Posts: 4,749
|
Re: 73 crossmember on a 1950
Do you mean the rear end or the transmission crossmember?
__________________
53 TuTone Extended Cab 350 4-Spd 3:08 (SOLD) 53 Chevy Moldy pearl green ZZ-4 4L60E 9" 3:25 55 GMC 1st Black Mll (ZZ4) ZZ6 TKO 600 5 sp 3:73 62 Solidaxle Corvette Roman Red (327 340hp 4spd 3:36) C4 & C5 suspension tube chassis LS 3 4L70E 65 Corvette Coupe 327 350hp 4spd 4:11 78 Black Silverado SWB (350/350) 5.3 & 4L60E 3:42 2000 S-Type 3.0 (wife cruiser) 2003 GMC SCSB 5.3 4L60E 3:42 |
03-29-2008, 07:07 PM | #3 |
polishing a turd
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 674
|
Re: 73 crossmember on a 1950
i think he means the front suspension crossmember
__________________
59 chevy apache 31 4x4 - my project: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8668512 53 buick special - straight 8 sled - blow through turbo 47 gmc - flatbed hot rod build 99 ford econoline e350 - 4x4 converted family roadtrip/overlanding rig AKA 'Monstervan' AKA 'Daddy-Van' |
03-30-2008, 12:02 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: tacoma wa.
Posts: 1,037
|
Re: 73 crossmember on a 1950
track width is to wide. i have talked to a handful of people that have done this and wish they didn't. couple of them also did it to TF trucks and said they should have used a different clip.
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|