The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-12-2009, 10:37 PM   #1
bodyman9174
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: south burbs of chicago IL
Posts: 237
little help please

Hi everyone been trying to find something in the search but could not find anything.
I have a 79 long bed 2 wheel drive pickup( pretty nice truck) but what I want to do is put a 88 to 95 frame and drive line under it with 4x4. Will my body bolt up to the newer frame? I want the tbi 350 to. Or would it just be a big pain in the rear to do?
thanks jay
bodyman9174 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 11:38 PM   #2
andrewmp6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Louisville,Ky
Posts: 5,811
Re: little help please

I have no clue if it will work but i would pass on the tbi its more like a 2 barrel carb id look for a vortec or tpi.
andrewmp6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 01:02 AM   #3
bodyman9174
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: south burbs of chicago IL
Posts: 237
Re: little help please

yeah but the tbi gets good mpg and easy to work on. I just need to know if the body mounts are in the same place.
__________________
Cars i have done
bodyman9174 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 04:51 AM   #4
heavychevy79
Cheyenne Super
 
heavychevy79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 545
Re: little help please

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewmp6 View Post
I have no clue if it will work but i would pass on the tbi its more like a 2 barrel carb id look for a vortec or tpi.
It's the restrictive heads on the TBI engines that hinder performance.
Other than that, it's a good engine.
I would go Vortec myself. Those fuel spiders are costly, and take a day
to replace when they go bad. Either way would be a lot of work.


Why not put the body on a 99 up frame? then you would have the LS drive
train everybody is crazy about, plus disc brakes all around, and your choice
of cheap 6 lug wheels.
There is no short supply of wrecked late model trucks around here.
heavychevy79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 04:53 PM   #5
kevinr1970
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,316
Re: little help please

Quote:
Originally Posted by heavychevy79 View Post
...plus disc brakes all around, ...
They stopped dpoing the rear discs after a few years; my '06 is rear drum. From what I read, which could be pure speculation, the rear discs had too many problems.


To the OP, what is the impetus for using the newer frame; are you wanting the independent front suspension, the (more) modern electronics, or ??
Or do you have a line on a good deal for a donor truck already?

Aside from the IFS, the rest is just a newer version of the same? You get some modern technology with electronics and such but I don't see that equating to a better ride. If that is what you are looking for?

If you are looking for the driveability from FI, doing just that conversion should be way cheaper than all the work and $ trying to retrofit your body on the newer frame.
__________________
2009 Honda Fit CfC (bsf 44.9 mpg)
2000 Tahoe Limited
1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 2wd, will end up swb, not dually and replace CCswb below
1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 4x4, just going to fix things up for now
1982/1989 K5/GMC Jimmy 2wd
1987 GMC 1/2 ton swb 2wd Crew (sold)
kevinr1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 03:33 AM   #6
b454rat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 3,469
Re: little help please

I don't imagine anything will line up. Your gonna have to completly remove the body mounts so they match up with the truck mounts. Not saying it can't be done, just alot of work.
__________________
2000 GMC CCSB 454/4L80 6” lift SAS
1999 Chevy CCSB 454/NV4500 4” SAS
1999 GMC Yukon 350/4L60 6" SAS
b454rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 08:41 PM   #7
andrewmp6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Louisville,Ky
Posts: 5,811
Re: little help please

Been me i would find a 4x4 c10 and drop in whatever engine and tranny i want.Straight axle is cheaper to lift and does better off road.I have seen a few newer beds on c10s no clue what it takes to work tho.Only thing i can tell you is to measure the frame and body mounts on both which are probably different.
andrewmp6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 10:09 PM   #8
bodyman9174
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: south burbs of chicago IL
Posts: 237
Re: little help please

Thanks all don't really have a line on a truck. Was just thinking have a newer drive line with the old look. But did not know the frames were that much different. The biggest reason for wanting to do this is I had a 89 gmc with the 350 tbi and get got great mpg. my 78 right now is getting like 9 or 10 kinda sucks. any tips on what I can do to get better mpg? right now I have 350/350, rpm intake, and a edelbrock carb.
__________________
Cars i have done
bodyman9174 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com