The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Racing and high performance (trucks haulin more than hay)

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-23-2009, 12:20 AM   #1
Jim_PA
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
New times are in

Best was 14.2 @ 93.5 60' on that run was 2.05 - The launches felt pretty solid, I was all-but dumping the clutch and smashing the skinny pedal from right around 3-3500 RPM's. I don't know if there is a whole lot of improvement in this area or not. I cut almost a full half second on my 60' from my previous best run of 14.4 @ 97.8. with a 2.5 sec. 60'. I was running 26X9 Hoosier slicks this time vs 295/50/15 radials last time. Tire diameter is virtually the same.

I was a little disappointed about the 4 MPH loss in trap speed, I was hoping that with a full magnaflow system, and some Tri-Y's I would have at least been at the same speed as before. Maybe my tuning was a little off.

I'd really like break that 13 second barrier. I think before I go again, I'd like to add in a wideband o2 system to try to make sure a tuning issue isn't in play. If that doesn't do it, then who knows what I'll do next. Was thinking electric fans, but I don't have the room, and really don't want to put forth the effort required to make that happen.
Jim_PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2009, 07:51 AM   #2
Wild83C10
Registered User
 
Wild83C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 910
Re: New times are in

There is definitely something wrong there. If you cut 1/2 second off of your 60' you should have dropped more then .2 off of your ET. You should have run like a 13.5 to 13.8.
I'm surprised you only ran a 2.05 60' with a slick. Did you spin? bog?
What's your fuel system? Total advance? How heavy is your truck?
I was running mid 13s with a 350 and a muncie M21 (2.20 first gear), drag radials and 3.90 rear gear. That was with a 2.0-2.1 60' with a 107 mph trap speed.
__________________
83 C10 Stepside (SOLD, it was a blast!)

383 MASS-FLO EFI/TKO II 600/3.90 Posi 10 bolt
S475 and C4 DM running, fine tuning
turbo=
Douchebag Racing: Runs Fine all the Time
Wild83C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2009, 08:48 AM   #3
Jim_PA
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
Re: New times are in

Truck weighs about 4650 with me in it. The clutch may be the weak link, as I think it was slipping a little as I hammered it. Could be lack of experience too. No bog. Fuel system 3/8" Edelbrock street pump. Total advance was 37.5 deg. I should have backed it down to 36.
Jim_PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2009, 02:19 PM   #4
383Ram
Registered User
 
383Ram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Truckville, The Capital of NY
Posts: 217
Re: New times are in

Try backing the timing down some and check the plugs. You might be surprised that it may run faster with less timing. The MPH seems a tad low for the ET, it may be losing something on the top end.

Going to the track can be an act of fustration. The most fun i had was running a 18-19 sec car. I just got there when i did, and it was a blast watching people trying to catch me. Keep it fun, its what its all about.
383Ram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 01:00 AM   #5
gchemist
BAD BOW-Silverado XST
 
gchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Senior Member from Austin, TX
Posts: 6,431
Re: New times are in

[QUOTE=Jim_PA;3323375]Truck weighs about 4650 with me in it. [QUOTE]

Wow, that's heavy. Can you loose a pounds?
__________________
Gerardo a.k.a. Mad Chemist
Silverado XST videos
gchemist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 07:31 AM   #6
Jim_PA
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
Re: New times are in

[quote=gchemist;3325734][QUOTE=Jim_PA;3323375]Truck weighs about 4650 with me in it.
Quote:

Wow, that's heavy. Can you loose a pounds?
I weigh about 250, so yeah, I could stand to lose a few pounds.

Been thinking about making her a short bed.
Jim_PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 03:06 AM   #7
71chevytruckguy
Registered User
 
71chevytruckguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kernersville, NC
Posts: 599
Re: New times are in

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_PA View Post
Truck weighs about 4650 with me in it. The clutch may be the weak link, as I think it was slipping a little as I hammered it. Could be lack of experience too. No bog. Fuel system 3/8" Edelbrock street pump. Total advance was 37.5 deg. I should have backed it down to 36.
As irconic as this sounds, a little clutch slip off the line is what you want with a 4-spd. This takes some of the shock off the drivetrain and allows the motor to stay in its power range while rest off the drive train catches ups. Chris.
__________________
its a work in progess.

71 c-10 lwb, in the middle of frame off restoration.

69 c-10 swb, drag truck, 406 sbc, balanced, comp 292 cam, ported, polished, gasket matched, and bowl blended pro comp 210cc heads, 2.02/1.60 ferrea valves,1.6 roller rockers, re curved hei with msd 6al box, 2-step rev limter, accel 300+ wires, ported victor jr intake, holley 750 double pumper carb, dynomax 1 5/8 headers, 4 spd munci m-20 with super case and iron midplate, mr. gasket vertigate shifter, 5.38 pro gears with full spool, 33 spline moser axles and c-clip elimators, line-loc, 5 gal fuel cell, holley blue pump.
7.807 @ 88.37mph 1.60 60FT

80 g-20 van, tow rig, cammed 305, th350, 10 bolt

88 jeep wrangler, dd, 258, ax-15 swap, 4.5" lift, 33x12.50's, lockers, 3.55's
71chevytruckguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 07:32 AM   #8
Jim_PA
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
Re: New times are in

Quote:
Originally Posted by 71chevytruckguy View Post
As irconic as this sounds, a little clutch slip off the line is what you want with a 4-spd. This takes some of the shock off the drivetrain and allows the motor to stay in its power range while rest off the drive train catches ups. Chris.
I was definitely happy the clutch was slipping. It made everything feel like it was going to stay together
Jim_PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2009, 10:12 PM   #9
Jim_PA
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
Re: New times are in

Thinking about getting one of these http://www.ngk.com/afx/

$246.99 shipped on ebay. I guess the worst that can happen is I get it and find I'm pretty darn close.
Jim_PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 12:07 AM   #10
Jim_PA
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
Re: New times are in

This looks even better. Can log RPM input to your data logger: http://www.14point7.com/Widebands/JA.../JAW_1_041.htm
Jim_PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 07:31 AM   #11
Wild83C10
Registered User
 
Wild83C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 910
Re: New times are in

Never heard of either of those WB. I use the innovate, they have some good stuff and you can add on sensors. Of course it cost more. The AFR and RPM datalog is a nice feature, otherwise you are driving and trying to look at your O2 gauge.
__________________
83 C10 Stepside (SOLD, it was a blast!)

383 MASS-FLO EFI/TKO II 600/3.90 Posi 10 bolt
S475 and C4 DM running, fine tuning
turbo=
Douchebag Racing: Runs Fine all the Time
Wild83C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 11:33 AM   #12
Marv D
Registered Truck Offender
 
Marv D's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: hells training ground (aka Ariz)
Posts: 3,118
Re: New times are in

Ditto,, Innovate is what you want. You can log in your laptop, or any data logger. Just be aware,, data is just as addictive as the 'faster faster faster' thing. You start with logging wideband A/F ratios,, then next thing you know your selling plasma to buy oil temp sensors, driveshaft speed sensors,

BTW... The narrow band stuff is totally a waste of $'s IMO. Don't even think about it.
__________________
Still playin with trucks, even at my age!

When you're dead, it's only a problem for the people around you, because you don't know you're dead.
.....It's kinda the same when your STUPID.


I just did my taxes and reviewed my SS statement. Thanks to the current administration it looks like I will only have to work till noon on the day of my funeral.
Marv D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 02:54 PM   #13
Super73
Registered User
 
Super73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 2,841
Re: New times are in

I have had 3 Innovate LC-1's and would never buy another one. Reason for 3 is the first one died, as did the second one and guess what, the third one is dead in my truck too. I would have to constantly do free air calibrations to keep them accurate (7 out of 10 times) and to get a reading out of them. The A to D's kept dying on them (They have 2 channels). I never did test the RS232 output as I was running the WB through HPtuners and my laptop.

When it did work, it was a great tool.

It seems a lot of people have had issues with the LC-1's but the LM-1's are solid pieces.

Agreed the Narrow bands are not worth your money.
__________________
------Motor---------------Bottle
60'---1.53---------------1.41
1/8---6.58 @ 105.92----5.87 @ 118.41
1/4---10.38 @ 126.97----9.24 @ 142.49
Super73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 03:23 PM   #14
Marv D
Registered Truck Offender
 
Marv D's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: hells training ground (aka Ariz)
Posts: 3,118
Re: New times are in

Interesting.. I'm running a LC-1 controlling WB 02 in each header of the Nova, and have had zero issues. Oh, wait, I take that back. One of the original LC-1's had a problem in it would cycle through the warmup over and over and sometimes lock in, sometimes not. Sent it in, they sent a new one and have not had any problem since. But your right, there was some issue on a board produced about a year or two ago. I heard that was all resolved and warranteed out, the new board is stable. But.. that's just what I've heard. Mine (after the initial replacement in 05) has been rock solid (knock on wood).
__________________
Still playin with trucks, even at my age!

When you're dead, it's only a problem for the people around you, because you don't know you're dead.
.....It's kinda the same when your STUPID.


I just did my taxes and reviewed my SS statement. Thanks to the current administration it looks like I will only have to work till noon on the day of my funeral.
Marv D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 10:24 PM   #15
Jim_PA
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
Re: New times are in

I think I'm going to try the DIY for $80. If it sucks, It looks like I have a 60 day return, and the sensor used is the same as what's needed for the innovative.. So I can always return the DIY, and pick up the innovative without the sensor somewhere.

My main reason is that for $80, it will pick up RPM. I can see how it might be difficult to analyze your test runs without seeing the RPM associated with the A/F data.

Thanks for the info, I'll make a thread about it after I get it up and running.
Jim_PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 07:21 AM   #16
Wild83C10
Registered User
 
Wild83C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 910
Re: New times are in

I haven't had my innovate for very long, no isues as of yet. A few of my friends have them and they haven't had any issues.
It does seem that there are a few people out there that have had problems from what I read, but I still decided to buy one.
Good luck with the DIY, but remember, sometimes you get what you pay for.
__________________
83 C10 Stepside (SOLD, it was a blast!)

383 MASS-FLO EFI/TKO II 600/3.90 Posi 10 bolt
S475 and C4 DM running, fine tuning
turbo=
Douchebag Racing: Runs Fine all the Time
Wild83C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 07:33 AM   #17
Jim_PA
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
Re: New times are in

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild83C10 View Post
Good luck with the DIY, but remember, sometimes you get what you pay for.
Yep Prepared for the worst, hoping for the best
Jim_PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 06:18 PM   #18
70rs/ss
Registered User
 
70rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,270
Re: New times are in

I have heard the tri-y's give up a little on the top end, as they are designed to build tq down low, they give up some on the top, what is your RPM going through the traps?
70rs/ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 11:44 AM   #19
Jim_PA
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
Re: New times are in

About 4000 -- Last time, I was up around 4500.
Jim_PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2009, 09:46 AM   #20
crossy
Oh,you can't buy that new
 
crossy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsville,N.J. 08070, USA
Posts: 2,039
Re: New times are in

i had mine doing 13.2's and people thought it was a dog, but they(car & S10 owners) don't realize what it is like trying to push the equivalant of a 4'x8' sheet of plywood down the track. the frontal area of a full size older truck is massive. the MPH on a truck will always be down a bit due to that so I advanced my cam 4* and built the engine to make bottom end power. My 60' was 1.85 with drag radials, that i had a hard time getting to hook, with only a 350. my engine is a stock block,(Absolutely no machining),stock bore 350 with GM closed chamber heads #041's, hydraulic 505 lift cam, performer RPM, Holley,out of the box, vacuum 750, and cheap, long tube headers with 40's and dumps bolted on.the engine only made 275HP to the rear wheels, but 415 torque! it weighs around 4200 with me in it.
There is a lot of E.T. in a QJ with proper jetting and rods changes just a bit harder to pinpoint than a holley. try a stock Holley vaccum 750 or DP 650 from someone just to see.
Oh, yeah i did have a 4.10 gear and 3000 stall. when it hooked my head would hit the back window! I broke the TH400 (Bad suspension issues set up by PO) before i had a chance to tune it into the 12's. crossy
__________________
"been there, done that, ruined the T-shirt".
2007 LBZ GMC Sierra, ECSB
2006 LM7 RCSB Silverado
98 Vortec project.
94,3500,6.5L 4L80
81 SWB GMC POS finally gone
73 Pinto, stock, w/CragarSS's-eww
LOTS of Cummins trucks.

Last edited by crossy; 05-28-2009 at 09:50 AM.
crossy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2009, 10:30 AM   #21
Jim_PA
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
Re: New times are in

Quote:
Originally Posted by crossy View Post
i had mine doing 13.2's and people thought it was a dog, but they(car & S10 owners) don't realize what it is like trying to push the equivalant of a 4'x8' sheet of plywood down the track. the frontal area of a full size older truck is massive. the MPH on a truck will always be down a bit due to that so I advanced my cam 4* and built the engine to make bottom end power. My 60' was 1.85 with drag radials, that i had a hard time getting to hook, with only a 350. my engine is a stock block,(Absolutely no machining),stock bore 350 with GM closed chamber heads #041's, hydraulic 505 lift cam, performer RPM, Holley,out of the box, vacuum 750, and cheap, long tube headers with 40's and dumps bolted on.the engine only made 275HP to the rear wheels, but 415 torque! it weighs around 4200 with me in it.
There is a lot of E.T. in a QJ with proper jetting and rods changes just a bit harder to pinpoint than a holley. try a stock Holley vaccum 750 or DP 650 from someone just to see.
Oh, yeah i did have a 4.10 gear and 3000 stall. when it hooked my head would hit the back window! I broke the TH400 (Bad suspension issues set up by PO) before i had a chance to tune it into the 12's. crossy
I think a linelock would help me. I have a feeling I was starting to roll off the line before I was really getting the clutching/throttle going in full sync.

I'm hoping the wideband system will get any tuning issues out of the way, but the devil had tempted me to strap a holley on just to see what it would do
Jim_PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2009, 08:52 PM   #22
Jim_PA
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
Re: New times are in

Line lock ordered
Jim_PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2009, 11:55 PM   #23
71chevytruckguy
Registered User
 
71chevytruckguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kernersville, NC
Posts: 599
Re: New times are in

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_PA View Post
Line lock ordered
some of the best money you can spend with a manual. its so nice not having to worry about the brakes when your on the line and makes burnouts easier. another thing you might want to consider if your gonna do much bracket racing is a 2 step revlimiter. put the gas to the floor and it'll hold the engine at what ever rpm you want to leave at everytime, no tryin to watch the tree and the tach. Chris.
__________________
its a work in progess.

71 c-10 lwb, in the middle of frame off restoration.

69 c-10 swb, drag truck, 406 sbc, balanced, comp 292 cam, ported, polished, gasket matched, and bowl blended pro comp 210cc heads, 2.02/1.60 ferrea valves,1.6 roller rockers, re curved hei with msd 6al box, 2-step rev limter, accel 300+ wires, ported victor jr intake, holley 750 double pumper carb, dynomax 1 5/8 headers, 4 spd munci m-20 with super case and iron midplate, mr. gasket vertigate shifter, 5.38 pro gears with full spool, 33 spline moser axles and c-clip elimators, line-loc, 5 gal fuel cell, holley blue pump.
7.807 @ 88.37mph 1.60 60FT

80 g-20 van, tow rig, cammed 305, th350, 10 bolt

88 jeep wrangler, dd, 258, ax-15 swap, 4.5" lift, 33x12.50's, lockers, 3.55's
71chevytruckguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com