Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
10-04-2010, 03:47 PM | #1 |
Enjoy your truck
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,066
|
Rear shocks - '63-'66 vs '67-'72
Last week I switched out my rear coils and shocks in my '63. All went well. I took the truck for a drive and it seemed to be very bouncy at first but settled down after a bit of driving. I was supplied with Monroe Matic-plus #32301 shocks and Moog 6101 coils.
I just referenced the part numbers on the internet and found that the coils are correct for '63-'66 1/2 tons with coils but the shocks are for '67-'72 1/2 tons with coils. Monroe lists #31000 for '63-'66 rear shocks. I was always under the impression that the '60-'72 rear suspensions were all alike (generally). Why would there be two different part numbers for the different rear shocks? Should I return the '67-'72 rear shocks? Greg
__________________
1 Corinthians 10:13 1963 Chevrolet 1/2 ton 2010 Camaro SS/RS 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2016 Jeep Cherokee |
10-05-2010, 07:50 AM | #2 |
67-72 parts collector,…
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,700
|
Re: Rear shocks - '63-'66 vs '67-'72
Did you buy them locally?
I think I would return them and see if the #31000 shock is still available. I assume your coils are the stock height?
__________________
Keith Convert to disc brakes. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823 |
10-05-2010, 08:09 AM | #3 |
Enjoy your truck
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Rear shocks - '63-'66 vs '67-'72
Got them locally, and the 31000's are available. The coils are oem replacements from Moog.
Physically, both shocks are the same (I looked at Rockauto's specs on them). Must be some reason there are two different part numbers. Greg.
__________________
1 Corinthians 10:13 1963 Chevrolet 1/2 ton 2010 Camaro SS/RS 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2016 Jeep Cherokee |
10-05-2010, 01:56 PM | #4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 2,454
|
Re: Rear shocks - '63-'66 vs '67-'72
Quote:
Ray |
|
10-21-2010, 09:58 AM | #5 |
Enjoy your truck
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Rear shocks - '63-'66 vs '67-'72
I have driven the truck a few times now since I posted this and it now seems to be "normal" again.
I received this response from Monroe regarding the differences in the two shocks; That's correct. They do physically look the same, and yes, the valving internally may be softer on the 32301 shock than that of the 31000. The mounting styles are a little different as well. I have made a comparison below: 32301: 11.875" comp. length 18.250" ext. length 6.375" travel LS37 loop - loop mount which is 1/2" ID bolt hole, and 1 3/8" bushing width (Embedded image moved to file: pic31762.jpg) 31000: 12.00" comp. length 19.50" ext. length 7.50" travel L1 loop - loop type mount which is 10MM ID bolt hole, and 15/16" bushing width (Embedded image moved to file: pic28423.jpg) Both shocks are Monro-Matic Gas charged shocks, but notice the slight difference in the mounting loops. For further questions or assistance, please contact technical assistance at 734-384-7809 M - F 8:30am - 5:30pm EST. Monroe Team Member Should I leave well enough alone? Greg.
__________________
1 Corinthians 10:13 1963 Chevrolet 1/2 ton 2010 Camaro SS/RS 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2016 Jeep Cherokee Last edited by Greg63; 10-21-2010 at 09:58 AM. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|