The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-22-2013, 01:39 PM   #1
americanmusc1e
Senior Member
 
americanmusc1e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,079
round tubing vs pipe question

I didn't know exactly where to post this, but I have a question on round tubing.

Is there a major strength difference between schedule 40 (or schedule 80 for that matter) pipe and round tubing? and will it matter in my case?

I'm needing to build a few things for my truck including a new engine crossmember and eventually some bumpers and whatever. I seem to recall reading somewhere that you are not supposed to use "water pipe" in any structural application, but I have access to a large amount of free schedule 40 pipe. Some of it is galvanized, but I have welded on galvanized stuff before. I am aware that the galvanizing needs to be removed around the weld and its important to keep adequate ventilation. Assuming that my welds are good and my creations are properly engineered, can I use the schedule 40 or should I look into buying what I need?
__________________
-- Josh

Instagram: @americanmusc1e

OLD SKOOL-- 1970 C10. 454/Th400/3.07 posi Build Thread
FARM TRUCK----1949 Chevrolet 3800 Power Wagon Hauler Build Thread

1999 4wd OBS Tahoe - daily.

DM me if you can't see photos i posted
americanmusc1e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 02:57 PM   #2
dznucks
Registered User
 
dznucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Smyrna, Ga
Posts: 1,647
Re: round tubing vs pipe question

without going into the weeds of the differences between the two, for your purposes think of it like this..... Pipe is designed to handle internal pressure from transferring some type of pressurized liquid or gas, typically it is brittle and not forgiving. Tube is deisnged to be structural, handling loads in many different direction and even having some elasticity(flex).

Think about the application and decide which is better. for example, I would make the engine cross member out of tube because it will be handling loading of many different types and should be able to flex under heavy engine loads to avoid cracking. on the other hand, a bumper could be made of anything since it is ultimately sacrificial.

You will also want to think about the criticallity of the specific peice. you can drive down the road with a cracked bumper, but not with a cracked engine crossmemeber.
dznucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 06:38 PM   #3
mmiddle
Registered User
 
mmiddle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Forestburg, Texas
Posts: 659
Re: round tubing vs pipe question

2x Pipe is not for structure.
__________________
Mark
Jesus is the Way!
2003 2500HD CCLB Duramax/Ali (Clifford)
2014 2SS/RS black on black Camaro (Betty)
2006 Pontiac SOLSTICE silver/black (Lula-Bell)
1970 C/10 Short Wide (Peggy)
1964 C/10 Short Step (Hambone)
RIP Jimmy Hamilton Thank you for the trucks
mmiddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 07:36 PM   #4
davidfre21
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: odessa,tx
Posts: 72
Re: round tubing vs pipe question

I've ran sch 40 and 80 1" and 2" pipe for bridge cross bars and other random BS without any issues. I don't know if id do an engine xmember though. Most tubing is seamless which helps with the strength. But some of the piping I've come across in the field is also.
Posted via Mobile Device
davidfre21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 08:23 PM   #5
LONGHAIR
just can't cover up my redneck
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
Re: round tubing vs pipe question

Tubing is for "building things".
Pipe is for transferring/storing things. Liquid, gas, etc.

Tubing is measured on the outside diameter. When the wall thickness gets greater, the inside diameter gets smaller.
Pipe is measured by the inside diameter. When the wall thickness gets greater, the outside diameter increases.
__________________
You can review the site's rules here.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Longhorn Man View Post
As for reading directions...
The directions are nothing but another man's opinion.
Learn from the mistakes of others, you won't live long enough to make them all yourself...

Bad planning on your part does not necessarily constitute an instant emergency on my part....

The great thing about being a pessimist is that you are either pleasantly surprised or right.
LONGHAIR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2013, 09:11 PM   #6
chevyrestoguy
Registered User
 
chevyrestoguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: apple valley, ca
Posts: 2,670
Re: round tubing vs pipe question

Tubing should always be called out by it's outer diameter and it's wall thickness. Pipe is measured by Schedule numbers, which is an inside wall thickness. It scares me when I hear guys doing chassis work with pipe. It's designed to move liquids or gasses, and is not for structural applications.

If you're doing small jobs, go to your local steel yard and look through their scrap bin or their cut pile for the tubing you need. They'll make you a great deal on it, and you'll be getting the right material to start with.
__________________
Check out my latest endeavor:
https://roundsixpod.com

My build threads:
'55 Chevy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=247512

'64 C-20: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=446527
chevyrestoguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com