Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
12-09-2013, 01:33 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 8,800
|
Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
Nevermind....not my job
__________________
1959 Chevy Short Fleetside w/ 74 4WD drive train (current project) OrrieG Build Thread 1964 Chevelle Malibu w/ 355-350TH (daily driver) Helpful AD and TF Manual Site Old Car Manual Project |
12-09-2013, 10:20 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Fairport NY
Posts: 63
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
OrrieG- not my job either- however- regarding thread etiquette- I see we need to educate users that unless their comment or question has to do with the original posters question, they are stealing the thread- totally not cool.. And also- other users should know not to respond to that persons off topic question. They should be advised to start a new thread..
|
12-09-2013, 01:45 PM | #3 | |
Hollister Road Co.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 6,131
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
Quote:
|
|
12-09-2013, 10:29 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cactus Patch So. Az
Posts: 4,749
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
Thank You, I will pay more attention to this!
__________________
53 TuTone Extended Cab 350 4-Spd 3:08 (SOLD) 53 Chevy Moldy pearl green ZZ-4 4L60E 9" 3:25 55 GMC 1st Black Mll (ZZ4) ZZ6 TKO 600 5 sp 3:73 62 Solidaxle Corvette Roman Red (327 340hp 4spd 3:36) C4 & C5 suspension tube chassis LS 3 4L70E 65 Corvette Coupe 327 350hp 4spd 4:11 78 Black Silverado SWB (350/350) 5.3 & 4L60E 3:42 2000 S-Type 3.0 (wife cruiser) 2003 GMC SCSB 5.3 4L60E 3:42 |
12-09-2013, 01:00 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Floyds Knobs, IN
Posts: 430
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
I saw this this morning and thought you were talking about this
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=607146 |
12-09-2013, 01:41 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 8,800
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
Yep, yep and thank you solid axle. One build thread for your rig, just answer the questions for others posts...
__________________
1959 Chevy Short Fleetside w/ 74 4WD drive train (current project) OrrieG Build Thread 1964 Chevelle Malibu w/ 355-350TH (daily driver) Helpful AD and TF Manual Site Old Car Manual Project |
12-09-2013, 01:48 PM | #7 |
Catchy title goes here..
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Rockwell, NC
Posts: 39,793
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
hijacking is a no no, if yall are having issues with these things use the report a post button so we can fix it
|
12-09-2013, 05:45 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Floyds Knobs, IN
Posts: 430
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
|
12-09-2013, 06:00 PM | #9 |
Catchy title goes here..
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Rockwell, NC
Posts: 39,793
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
Just click the ! icon and it sends a report to the staff. Try it with this one if you want click the icon fill in the reason click enter or send or whatever it says |
12-09-2013, 02:33 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Motown
Posts: 7,680
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
i'm maybe guilty of being cranky sometimes
especially when the post asks the same thing over and over the search function doesn't work too good on here but, new people should read some of the build threads for year specific builds before asking questions same old same old questions all the time.
__________________
cool, an ogre smiley Ogre's 58 Truk build how to put your truck year and build thread into your signature shop air compressor timer |
12-09-2013, 05:08 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toppenish, WA
Posts: 15,731
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
Guilty of being cranky at times. I agree with not hijacking someone else's thread and taking it off topic. I see that on all too many forums though. Same with commenting on a thread that has been dead in the archives for three or four years because you found it on google and decided to register on the forum so you could throw your two cents worth in. I'd like to see threads on all forums close except to the op after a time lapse.
One thing that gets my goat is guys who post answers with instructions that are not good work practice or the correct way to do certain tasks. Maybe that is the way uncle Billybob did it back 40 years ago but it may not be the proper or correct way to do the task and save the part (s) you are trying to save. My first job in a shop was following behind a kid who had grown up in a wrecking yard from the time he was about 14. The boss had him pull the engine out of a car so it could be rebuilt and 20 minutes later he announces he had it out. Sure did, he had pulled it just like he did in the wrecking yard by cutting all the wires and cables and cutting the exhaust pipe in two. It took me almost a week of soldering one wire at a time to get the wires back together. Also we have to remember to consider the skill and knowledge level of the person asking the question before we pose an answer. We have all skill levels from pro builders to guys and gals who just bought their first project which just happens to be the first vehicle that they have ever done more than change oil and filter and windshield wipers on themselves. There isn't a thing wrong with that as we all have to start somewhere but it does have to be taken into consideration.
__________________
Founding member of the too many projects, too little time and money club. My ongoing truck projects: 48 Chev 3100 that will run a 292 Six. 71 GMC 2500 that is getting a Cad 500 transplant. 77 C 30 dualie, 454, 4 speed with a 10 foot flatbed and hoist. It does the heavy work and hauls the projects around. |
12-09-2013, 06:05 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Lakes Region NH
Posts: 3,205
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
I'll admit that I'm guilty of pulling a thread off topic from time to time due the the conversational tone I sometimes take in my replies. Sometimes I try to add related information and that can lead to an OT discussion as well. I do try to refer back to the original subject if I realize it's gone too far and it's never done with the intention to detract from or steal the original discussion.
Now it's one thing if the conversation takes a turn in a different direction as part of the natural flow. It's another altogether when a long term member deliberately starts another discussion in a thread that does not apply to the original post. That happened to me in the first thread I posted here and at the time I felt it was a pretty rude thing to do. Since then I've come to realize that most people here are helpful and just providing answers if they have them but at the time it really seemed like a hearty yuck foo. |
12-09-2013, 06:10 PM | #13 |
Catchy title goes here..
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Rockwell, NC
Posts: 39,793
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
Its fine to discuss stuff and go off trail a bit. If we stuck fully to one topic, things would get boring. The issue lies when folks flat out hijack.. Say you posted talking about new sheetmetal you bought to do some patches. Then I come in and say speaking of patches I want to patch the headliner in my 87 cougar instead of buy one, or should I buy one? Do I need one, nah no one needs one, so who do I buy it from???
Thats hijacking |
12-10-2013, 01:12 AM | #14 |
Catchy title goes here..
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Rockwell, NC
Posts: 39,793
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
it worked lmbo
|
12-10-2013, 01:41 AM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Derby Kansas
Posts: 564
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
WOW I think I needed this little lesson myself. I think I may have been guilty of saying something like "Look at my thread to see the way I addressed this Issue" or something like that. Is that a No-No?? Or are you just talking about kind of changing the subject of the persons thread and steering it a different direction?
__________________
av8tr33337 AKA Bartman Email av8tr33337@yahoo.com Bartman's Ad-S10 Chassis Swap http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=415418 My First Youtube Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6hSt...eature=channel More Pics of the 51 Project http://s668.photobucket.com/albums/v...hassis%20Swap/ 1951 3100 Pickup |
12-10-2013, 12:57 PM | #16 |
Certified Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Inglewood, California
Posts: 3,118
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
I personally don't see the issue. If you are not interested simply don't read it. There are a lot of guys here who consider themselves to friends and sometimes the topic goes off topic just as topics in person goes off topic. Its the way humans communicate, we are not robots. The topic always comes back again if you wait.lol
|
12-10-2013, 01:01 PM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Fairport NY
Posts: 63
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
"simply don't read it"?, how you gonna do that? Sure, sometimes the conversation wanders a bit, but when I start a thread on a particular topic and need answers to my questions, I don't want the conversation to take a left turn while two forum buddies start bee-essing about something unrelated. Go do that with a pm conversation.
Last edited by FirstNation; 12-10-2013 at 01:13 PM. |
12-10-2013, 02:57 PM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 8,800
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
Since I started this guess I better weigh back in. I do not think posts in threads that add information, insight or comments are a problem. The problem I have is when the thread is taken over by someone other than the OP and becomes a thread about their project or a topic unrelated to the original question. I admit I will occasionaly add a humorous observation or recite a long lost memory that may not be related to the topic. This site is big enough that having to filter thru extraneous stuff in a thread takes time, and can get frustrating to the OP that is just looking for specific answers to his questions.
Threads that are more general have room for off topic stuff ("pics for show and shine" " my new truck" "anyone going cruising this weekend"). The reason for individual threads is to keep the topics isolated, listing the topic in the header helps to. I think this has been a good discussion and reminders on what will keep this the great site it is. Now lets all retreat back to the garage and break something so we can continue posting....
__________________
1959 Chevy Short Fleetside w/ 74 4WD drive train (current project) OrrieG Build Thread 1964 Chevelle Malibu w/ 355-350TH (daily driver) Helpful AD and TF Manual Site Old Car Manual Project |
12-10-2013, 03:07 PM | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Fairport NY
Posts: 63
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
Couldn't be said any better than that..
|
12-10-2013, 03:10 PM | #20 |
Catchy title goes here..
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Rockwell, NC
Posts: 39,793
|
Re: Filling cranky, thread etiquette...
perfect Thank you OrrieG, that is it in a nutshell
closed at this point |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|