The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain > LSx Swaps

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-17-2017, 01:56 PM   #1
bad 71 chevy
Registered User
 
bad 71 chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Omaha NE 68122
Posts: 637
Fuel Line (Beat to Death)

So my question is what are the best fuel line to run. My plan is to just use 1/2" aluminum or stainless hard line and swagelok fittings. I am doing an 6.0 Ls in a 1971 C10 Long bed. All help appreciated. Looking for the pro and cons of each set up. The reason i am leaning towards the swagelok is i have an abundance of fitting at my disposal.

I have a stock style jimmy/burb tank under the bed as of now and am planning on doing an external pump. I plan on going to e85 at some point as well.

Thanks.
__________________
71 Chevy C/10 lwb 350
5 speed nv3500
3.73 rear end
2.5" Front Drop and 4" in the back
Edelbrock perfomer rpm manifold
Edelbrock 600 cfm carb
Headmen headers
bad 71 chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2017, 03:55 PM   #2
davepl
Registered User
 
davepl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 6,332
Re: Fuel Line (Beat to Death)

3/8 is more than enough. If you can bear all the tough bending, go stainless hard line... that's what I did.

I had some good bruises on my quad from the bender, because stainless is a bear to bend. But it sure turns out nice in the end!

Aluminum is MUCH easier to bend but doesn't provide the same level of underbody protection for the fuel line that stainless steel does.

Keep in mind external pumps can be very annoying for sound. Heck, my Camaro has the giant Aeromotive coffee-can pump IN TANK and I have a fuel pump controller to slow it down under light loads, and it's still annoying. Stay in-tank if you can!
__________________
1970 GMC Sierra Grande Custom Camper - Built, not Bought
1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Coupe
1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Convertible
davepl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2017, 04:31 PM   #3
BR3W CITY
meowMEOWmeowMEOW
 
BR3W CITY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 7,128
Re: Fuel Line (Beat to Death)

I don't trust aluminum lines. Burst pressure still wouldn't be until like 8-1200psi, and I know were talking fuel here, not brakes...but I just don't love them yet.

As for stainless hard line, always a great choice as long as you can deal with the bending like davepl says. They suck to flare and you CANNOT use any compression type fitting into them, but they are strong AF and last forever. You do need to be a little cautious of strain on vibration areas due to material fatigue however, as they have little flex.

1/2" line only if your planning on making north of like 800 and also plan on converting all the other fittings to -8 or larger.
__________________
'66 Short Step / SD Tuned / Big Cam LQ4 / Backhalfed /Built 4l80e / #REBUILDEVERYTHING

MY BUILD THE H8RDCPTR //\\ MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL REV J HD
BR3W CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2017, 12:43 AM   #4
68c10airstream
Registered User
 
68c10airstream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Marquette michigan
Posts: 828
Re: Fuel Line (Beat to Death)

Many years as a mechanic, turned power plant worker for the last 17 years now retired. Out steam plant was full of stainless hand formed lines with swagelock fittings that saw 1500 psi steady and not a single leak. If you think keeping fuel from leaking at 65 psi, try superheated dry steam at 1500 psi. As you made plant rounds you listened for hissing snakes, because if you walked/ran through a leak area it cut you in half. Valve packing leaks would eventually notch a chrome plated steel shaft and warrant replacement.
68c10airstream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2017, 04:02 AM   #5
bad 71 chevy
Registered User
 
bad 71 chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Omaha NE 68122
Posts: 637
Re: Fuel Line (Beat to Death)

Like stated I'm wanting 1/2" because eventually will be a blonwn set up on e85 and only want to do my fuel system once. Also My dad was a turbine tech/mechanic for 30 years and I have all of his brand new fittings and everything he used. Also what people forget is wall thickness on a 3/8" makes the I.d around 5/16 and 1/2" is just over3/8"
__________________
71 Chevy C/10 lwb 350
5 speed nv3500
3.73 rear end
2.5" Front Drop and 4" in the back
Edelbrock perfomer rpm manifold
Edelbrock 600 cfm carb
Headmen headers
bad 71 chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com