The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-10-2024, 10:53 PM   #1
bigmoe
Registered User
 
bigmoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Brandon, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 995
60-66 vs 67-72 cab room

Biggest complaint I have about my 65 is lack of driver room ( I'm 6'3). I'm wondering how the next series compares for room.
bigmoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 09:17 AM   #2
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmoe View Post
Biggest complaint I have about my 65 is lack of driver room ( I'm 6'3). I'm wondering how the next series compares for room.
Not much if any difference. Even the 73-87's were legroom limited.
The cabs didn't start getting any 'roomier' until the OBS '88 year model.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 09:35 AM   #3
verdell
Registered User
 
verdell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Columbus, MS
Posts: 445
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room

I'm 6'3" 255 and I think my '60 is more comfortable to drive and has a little more room than my brother's '71. He actually pointed it out to me and he's 6'4" 270.
verdell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 06:35 PM   #4
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room

Same seats in both trucks?

My 64 & 67 both have Buddy Buckets w/no in-cab tanks. I've sat in both w/them as far back as they can go. Even @ only 5'11, they feel the same to me as far as lacking room.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 09:04 PM   #5
dmb
Active Member
 
dmb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Location: randolph va
Posts: 159
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room

you just need to be 5 nine and weight 175 pounds. lol
I had a 66 sb about 30 years ago and had plenty of room, I have a 65 lb now and have no room but am 65 lbs heaver
__________________
Old dogs and children and watermelon wine
dmb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 09:13 PM   #6
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmb View Post
you just need to be 5 nine and weight 175 pounds. lol
I had a 66 sb about 30 years ago and had plenty of room, I have a 65 lb now and have no room but am 65 lbs heaver
I do feel for those over 6' in this old iron 🤣
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2024, 01:07 AM   #7
62bagger
Senior Member
 
62bagger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sonora California
Posts: 285
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room

I have a 62 and I am 6'4". I have the same complaint.
62bagger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2024, 09:24 AM   #8
Cohi
Registered User
 
Cohi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Denver, co
Posts: 113
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room

stock seat here. i'm cramped at 6-2 but love driving these trucks
__________________
Denver/Big Island -- Instagram: Slammed66c10
'46 Fleetmaster Coupe
'64 C10 on Ridetech Air Ride
'66 C10 on GSI Bagged Chassis - in progress
'12 FLHR
'11 Custom Homebuilt Chop/Softail
Cohi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2024, 02:13 PM   #9
verdell
Registered User
 
verdell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Columbus, MS
Posts: 445
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room

A 40/20/40 OBS seat in really good condition made a big difference for me as far as comfort. At least twice a year, we take rides anywhere from 5 to 8 hours and I honestly don't have too many complaints. The only complaint passengers have is the "knee knocker" cab design. My wife's used to it but other passengers, not so much LOL
verdell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2024, 02:49 PM   #10
62c30
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Derby Kansas
Posts: 386
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room

I have a 61 and 62. In the 62 it has the tank in the cab and a late 80's bench seat in it. I'm 6' tall and it's not terrible and my 85 isn't much better.
62c30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2024, 03:00 PM   #11
bpope
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 58
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room

Shoot, I have to scoot my seat up at 5'8" in my '63! Probably only two benefits in life of being petite stature: Fitting in my C10 and flying commercially.
bpope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2024, 08:44 PM   #12
AcampoDave
Registered User
 
AcampoDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,778
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room

Quote:
Originally Posted by bpope View Post
Shoot, I have to scoot my seat up at 5'8" in my '63! Probably only two benefits in life of being petite stature: Fitting in my C10 and flying commercially.
And best of all petite folks seem to hold up better as they age
AcampoDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2024, 09:50 PM   #13
murdoc
Registered User
 
murdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: nampa, idaho
Posts: 332
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room

I'm 6'2 and 185 lbs. I had to sell my 1950 3100 because I simply could not fit into it.

I couldn't even push in the clutch because my knee would mash up against the back of the steering wheel before I could even get my foot on the clutch pedal.

The 60-66 cab was soooo much better, sold my 1950 and have been a 60-66 fan ever since. Miss my 1950 sometimes, but I just couldn't fit in the darn thing.
murdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2024, 05:54 PM   #14
1972RedNeck
Registered User
 
1972RedNeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Townsend MT
Posts: 1,725
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room

I have heard early 90's seats have a thinner back and will gain you a little room...
__________________
1966 F250 4X4 416
1972 K20 350 4 OTF
Quote:
Originally Posted by GASoline71 View Post
I once pulled an intake manifold for a cam swap... ended up with a full on drag car that ran in the 11's.
1972RedNeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2024, 09:44 PM   #15
AcampoDave
Registered User
 
AcampoDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,778
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1972RedNeck View Post
I have heard early 90's seats have a thinner back and will gain you a little room...
I have one, and that seems true, but it sits kind of high. I'm going to have to do something about it too.
AcampoDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2024, 12:41 PM   #16
bnorth
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Salmon Arm BC
Posts: 201
Re: 60-66 vs 67-72 cab room

I'm 6'3" and feel like a gorilla driving my 70. I want to keep the original seat so I am going to lower the brackets for it and relocate the fuel tank so I can push it back further. If it is still not comfortable I will look for a thinner seat.
So no don't count on the 67-72 being more comfortable.
__________________
1970 C10 l/b 292/4spd
Build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=811062
bnorth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com