The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-2004, 11:06 PM   #1
ocbaud
Garage Queen Material
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,129
ideaR???

has anyone heard of or seen someone in a truck, any truck, connect there cab and bed together(not like a blazer) but through bolts to help with the frame flexxing under heavy turns?

i know a 2wd blazer will handle a lot better than a pickup, since the bed is connected.
ocbaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2004, 11:21 PM   #2
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
The only way I have seen it done with success is with down tubes on a roll cage. I can't imagine you getting enough strength to control body twist by bolting them together...
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2004, 11:34 PM   #3
C-10volvo
Registered User
 
C-10volvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lake Oswego, Oregon
Posts: 1,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocbaud
has anyone heard of or seen someone in a truck, any truck, connect there cab and bed together(not like a blazer) but through bolts to help with the frame flexxing under heavy turns?

i know a 2wd blazer will handle a lot better than a pickup, since the bed is connected.
if you really wanted to, you could box in the frame. a LOT of work though
__________________
Ken Morgan
For fun: 1964 Volvo 122
For slow: 1984 Chevrolet C-10
For everything else: 1997 BMW M3
C-10volvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2004, 11:37 PM   #4
ocbaud
Garage Queen Material
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,129
what got me thinking was our state is starting a new advertising thing "buckle up in your pickup"

saying how much easier they are to roll over compared to a car. if i had time to box in the frame, i would have time to do a full off-the frame restoration which i would really love to do
ocbaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2004, 11:41 PM   #5
C-10volvo
Registered User
 
C-10volvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lake Oswego, Oregon
Posts: 1,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocbaud
what got me thinking was our state is starting a new advertising thing "buckle up in your pickup"

saying how much easier they are to roll over compared to a car. if i had time to box in the frame, i would have time to do a full off-the frame restoration which i would really love to do
DO IT DO IT DO IT DO IT!!!! haha.
__________________
Ken Morgan
For fun: 1964 Volvo 122
For slow: 1984 Chevrolet C-10
For everything else: 1997 BMW M3
C-10volvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2004, 09:48 AM   #6
Grim Reaper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 1,704
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocbaud
what got me thinking was our state is starting a new advertising thing "buckle up in your pickup"

saying how much easier they are to roll over compared to a car. if i had time to box in the frame, i would have time to do a full off-the frame restoration which i would really love to do

SO MISGUIDED!

I hate that not safe junk and roll over junk. You adjust your driving to what you drive. An example I once read was they compaired a Vett to some SUV or Mini van. They took the number built and then how many rolled. They got a percentage of roll over accidents. Guess what. More vett end up on their lid then the other high CG vehicle when you look at it Builtvs rolled.

If this BS is alowed to continue we will have to wait to be insppected befor leaving for work everyt morning. This is how junk like Airbag and anti loc are not forced on you. I want neither so I no longer drive cars newer then 90.
end rant.

As for joining the body to bed. K5's tear the body up off road from flexing and they have a much shorter wheel base. If your wanting to make it more ridged then I would go a full roll cage tied to the frame. That would do the most to improve safety and rigidity and handling verses money spent then anything else you could possibly do. Add rear sway and 1 ton front sway all poly bushings in front end, Track bar on the rear and you can make it handle. Ride will suffer but it will handle.
__________________
Grim-Reaper
70 Pontiac LeMans Sport Convertible, worlds longest resto in progress
Looking for 71-72 2wd Blazer or Jimmy Project
Grim Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2004, 09:01 AM   #7
LOHRTBT
BeWarE tHe eViL CrAnkTOe!
 
LOHRTBT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Yukon, OK
Posts: 3,605
yes but look at the truck they are showing you lol.. a wheel gap havin 75 series tire usin Ford. lol of course it will roll easy. A lOwered truck is much harder to roll unless your being really crazy.
__________________
~Dave~
You can call me Mike, Mike Oxlong

- 1986 Chevy SWB - Stock for now
- 1986 Chevy Custom SWB *Stolen 6/26/05*
- 1985 Chevy SWB SOLD
- 1999 T/A Some mods
www.cardomain.com/id/ramairdave

AIM Screenname - Jester84
LOHRTBT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2004, 09:08 AM   #8
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
Yeah, Dave is right. If that's all you are worried about, just lower it some more...
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2004, 12:39 PM   #9
NeCrOmAnCeR
Registered User
 
NeCrOmAnCeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hodgenville, Ky
Posts: 735
No, it was an El Camino
NeCrOmAnCeR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2004, 04:07 PM   #10
ocbaud
Garage Queen Material
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,129
trust me guys, i'm not worried 1 bit about rolling my truck. i drive more carefull than that

i was just wondering if by connecting the cab and bed, it would improve handling.

i really want the truck to handle as well as possible(with the current susp. setup)
ocbaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2004, 05:16 PM   #11
apstguy
LED King
 
apstguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,087
Moonlight - is it the cabro or challet thing? Am I close? The big thing with a camper.
__________________
Tyler

1985 C10 305 w/ Bowtie OD TH700R4 3.42 LSD 202,000 miles
2006 Ford Focus ZX3 5-speed Stick
2016 Chevy Spark EV
Gone: 2002.5 VW GTI 24v VR6
Gone: 2008 VW R32
apstguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2004, 05:32 PM   #12
1969 GMC
Registered User
 
1969 GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
the Chalet was based on a Blazer...I'd guess its a motorhome, since its based on a C30 chassis :p

EDIT: I would like to see pics of your truck, please email to athorich "at" kent.edu

...thanks
__________________
1969 GMC K2500
1996 Honda Accord
2007 Kawasaki KLR 650
1969 GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2004, 05:44 PM   #13
apstguy
LED King
 
apstguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,087
Pics of my truck? Who are you talking to?
__________________
Tyler

1985 C10 305 w/ Bowtie OD TH700R4 3.42 LSD 202,000 miles
2006 Ford Focus ZX3 5-speed Stick
2016 Chevy Spark EV
Gone: 2002.5 VW GTI 24v VR6
Gone: 2008 VW R32
apstguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2004, 06:24 PM   #14
1969 GMC
Registered User
 
1969 GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
sorry, I meant moonlight...I want to see this "thing" he's got...
__________________
1969 GMC K2500
1996 Honda Accord
2007 Kawasaki KLR 650
1969 GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2004, 03:04 AM   #15
RockHQ
ROCKET POWER!
 
RockHQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Finland, Europe
Posts: 509
There are a few important things that need to be given thought above others. First off, the frame is made out of mild steel C-profile bent into shape. Second, the crossmembers are made out of sheet metal cut and bent into the right size, and then riveted to the C-profile. The suspension relies on the same principle, hydraulic pressed mild steel sheet A-arms, brackets, spring hangers and so on. GM did it to keep cost down, but more importantly they wanted the frame to flex under load because it's more durable that way. The same applies to your cab&bed, it needs to be isolated from the frame with rubber bushings so the frame can flex, and the cab&bed can flex on their own. You can not make the frame too stiff, or it will break where the yield point of the material is exceeded. That doesn't mean you can't improve the design, but there must be some flex in the frame.
__________________
What did i do last nite?
I had a wonderful time,
That's what they tell me
What did i do last nite?

1979 C-10 shortfleet: Olds 350, Th400, 12 bolt
Current project: 1969 Olds 455 W-30, needing a rebuild
RockHQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2004, 09:50 AM   #16
Grim Reaper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 1,704
Quote:
Originally Posted by moonlight
My truck bed and cab are FACTORY connected! Sorry no pics. I'm having trouble posting pics to this site. They're too big!
I'll send you details and pics if you're interested. The truck is beyond stiff because of a few factory goodies!
I'm purposely vague about how the extra "connection" was done to see if anybody in this forum can come up with the correct "factory" answer. I will say that it's a '74.
Oh yeah, I love my truck! The next owner can have it when he pries it from my cold, dead fingers!
Mark
It's a K5 or a Burb
__________________
Grim-Reaper
70 Pontiac LeMans Sport Convertible, worlds longest resto in progress
Looking for 71-72 2wd Blazer or Jimmy Project
Grim Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2004, 02:37 PM   #17
1969 GMC
Registered User
 
1969 GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
ocbaud,
don't listen to the government! people roll SUV's and trucks more because they cannot drive correctly and refuse to believe that they are not driving a porsche.

there are literally thousands of 73-87 trucks out there at stock suspension height, and how many have you heard of that had severe problems (well, aside from the saddle tanks...)?

Also, you never have to modify a vehicle from stock setup to meet certain laws. Especially something like boxing in the frame. This applies to other things as well, such as shoulder belts (or hell, seatbelts) and airbags. I don't see too mamny people swapping airbags into their trucks just because the government leads you to believe that trucks are unsafe.
__________________
1969 GMC K2500
1996 Honda Accord
2007 Kawasaki KLR 650

Last edited by 1969 GMC; 05-13-2004 at 02:38 PM. Reason: dumbazz cnat spel
1969 GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com