|
12-07-2004, 03:56 PM | #1 |
belly dragger
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: sherwood park AB. Canada
Posts: 694
|
Rad Support Bushing
Can anyone tell me how thick the stock rad support bushing is I need to know for mock up purposes.
|
12-07-2004, 06:30 PM | #2 |
Watch out for your cornhole !
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
|
I just went and measured a new GM one in the package for you. It's 13/16 inch thick. That's the main part of it. There is a raised lip around where the bolt passes through it, but that lip sits down into the hole in the frame, so it doesn't contribute any height.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin |
12-07-2004, 06:38 PM | #3 |
belly dragger
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: sherwood park AB. Canada
Posts: 694
|
Thanks much!
|
12-07-2004, 07:39 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Huntsville Ontario Canada
Posts: 4,051
|
Be careful what year are you building ? 67-68 and 69-72 are diffirent.
__________________
1968 Suburban numbers matching all original truck now equipped with 6.0/4L80 on Accuair http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=625017 1967 C/20 6.0/4L80 Roofing Truck 1990 V2500 Suburban "Plow Truck" 2005 TAHOE DD |
12-07-2004, 08:06 PM | #5 |
belly dragger
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: sherwood park AB. Canada
Posts: 694
|
72 but my blazer has 72 bushings with no ill effects
|
12-08-2004, 01:46 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Easley, South Carolina
Posts: 491
|
Core support bushings
I have been getting mixed messages about the bushings, some say they have used the 69-72 bushings on 67-68's with no problem while others say use only 67-68 bushings on 67-68's. I believe that LMC only sells the 69-72 type for all applications. What's the deal?????????????
__________________
Richard Dobson |
12-08-2004, 02:37 PM | #7 |
TOTY 2006
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Magalia CA USA
Posts: 2,270
|
I am interested in the difference too. Is there a difference in height between 67-68 and 69-72?
I am working on a 67 shortfleet, and when I set my cab back on the frame, the tranny is touching the flange of the tunnel on the cab. And I could have sworn that my mocked up bed sat too high bodyline wise, compared to the cab. If the 69-72 bushing are shorter, then that would be my problem. |
12-08-2004, 07:08 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Huntsville Ontario Canada
Posts: 4,051
|
Sorry I should have been more detailed I should have not posted untill I had enought time to explain. I am using 69-72 Rad support kit with my 67 front clip. I have no problems at all. Bill's Truck shop here in Canada told me that there were 2 diffirent styles. But I had already bought the 69-72 stlye months earlier I just told him the truck was a 72 and he sold me the 69-72 kit. When I saw the 67-68 kit I thought that they were alot thinner.
John When I put my truck together the body lines were not in line. To correct the problem I had to shim the box up 1/4" at the front cross sill and 1/8" ant the second cross sill. I also had to shim the cab tro get things to line up. On some trucks they had shims installed from the factory. I have noticed that alot of truck have this problem and I think most guy's dont think much of it. But the lines not flowing just bother the heck out of me.
__________________
1968 Suburban numbers matching all original truck now equipped with 6.0/4L80 on Accuair http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=625017 1967 C/20 6.0/4L80 Roofing Truck 1990 V2500 Suburban "Plow Truck" 2005 TAHOE DD Last edited by 72MARIO; 12-08-2004 at 07:15 PM. |
Bookmarks |
|
|