Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
09-12-2006, 11:16 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
|
Switched from 68 to 72 spindles, and camber is way off...
Did I do something wrong? when looking straight at the front of the truck, the front tires look like this:
\ ...... / ---- (positive camber) Ok, that's pretty exaggerated, but it's very obvious when just looking at it. Any ideas or something I might have missed? I used 72 spindles and upper/lower ball joints when I did this conversion. Last edited by Jim_PA; 09-13-2006 at 10:12 AM. |
09-12-2006, 11:24 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Maynardville, Tn
Posts: 3,030
|
Re: Switched from 68 to 72 spindles, and camber is way off...
That would be positive camber but I don't have a clue as to why. I've never done a swap so I don't know if there is a difference in the included angle between any of the spindles.
__________________
SEMA Network- Protect our Hobby! 71 C30 in pieces, starting to come together. Click here for A Place For Tennessee Truck Enthusiest To Meet |
09-12-2006, 11:28 PM | #3 |
User #12137
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: kingsport,upper east tenn
Posts: 11,598
|
Re: Switched from 68 to 72 spindles, and camber is way off...
you got to many shims in there , between the upper a arm and the frame , take sum out and take it to a alinement<sp? shop
|
09-12-2006, 11:47 PM | #4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
|
Re: Switched from 68 to 72 spindles, and camber is way off...
Quote:
I looked, and have a hard time believing that the 2 shims I have in there will make up for the problem I'm having, but it's a start!! |
|
09-12-2006, 11:53 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
|
Re: Switched from 68 to 72 spindles, and camber is way off...
Yep -- I see the site I got the negatie camber info from was wrong... - can't trust the internet!!
|
09-12-2006, 11:49 PM | #6 |
67-72 parts finder
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: southeast mo
Posts: 788
|
Re: Switched from 68 to 72 spindles, and camber is way off...
or you know you could just slam it and not worry about it haha
__________________
1969 chevy shortstep 2wd (under construction) 1981 chevy scottsdale lwb 2wd (parts chaser) 2004 pontiac gto (daily driver) 2004 pontiac grand prix gt (the ol ladys car) 1985 chevy short wide 1970 chevy c10 lwb (another parts rig) 1969 gmc lwb (rainy day project) 1968 chevy lwb c10 250 I6 3 spd (soon to be swb) |
09-12-2006, 11:52 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
|
Re: Switched from 68 to 72 spindles, and camber is way off...
|
09-13-2006, 12:04 AM | #8 |
67-72 parts finder
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: southeast mo
Posts: 788
|
Re: Switched from 68 to 72 spindles, and camber is way off...
or you could just cut one turn off the springs if thats how you roll lol i think i'd just buy the drop springs or you could just take it and have it aligned if you don't want it lowered personally i think these trucks look good slammed
__________________
1969 chevy shortstep 2wd (under construction) 1981 chevy scottsdale lwb 2wd (parts chaser) 2004 pontiac gto (daily driver) 2004 pontiac grand prix gt (the ol ladys car) 1985 chevy short wide 1970 chevy c10 lwb (another parts rig) 1969 gmc lwb (rainy day project) 1968 chevy lwb c10 250 I6 3 spd (soon to be swb) |
09-13-2006, 09:41 AM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gainesville, Georgia
Posts: 704
|
Re: Switched from 68 to 72 spindles, and camber is way off...
I don't know if this would cause visible alignment problems, but the ball joints and tie rods changed (size and taper) when they went to disc brakes in '71. Did you change these as well?
__________________
We made Oklahoma a little after 3, Randy & his brother Bob & my old GMC... |
09-13-2006, 09:48 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
|
Re: Switched from 68 to 72 spindles, and camber is way off...
THAT'S MY THOUGHT TOO
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY |
09-13-2006, 10:00 AM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
|
Re: Switched from 68 to 72 spindles, and camber is way off...
Yes, I put 72 ball joints and tie rod ends on -- the spindles wouldn't have fit otherwise --
I think several others on the board have done this swap, and I don't recall hearing anything like I'm seeing, so I'm a bit concerned... Last edited by Jim_PA; 09-13-2006 at 10:00 AM. |
09-13-2006, 11:52 AM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gainesville, Georgia
Posts: 704
|
Re: Switched from 68 to 72 spindles, and camber is way off...
You may want to check to make sure that the springs are seated correctly in the upper pockets and the lower control arms. I had a spring slip out of place in the upper pocket while I was jacking up the control arm during reassembly once, and it caused that same problem. I didn't even notice it because I was concentrating on getting the end of the coil in the right place on the control arm. If all looks well with the springs, I would just take it to the alignment shop.
__________________
We made Oklahoma a little after 3, Randy & his brother Bob & my old GMC... |
Bookmarks |
|
|