Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
09-04-2007, 07:08 PM | #1 |
A guy with a truck
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,921
|
Early vs. late control arms
All thing being equal i.e.: spindles, springs, brakes, etc.- if I swap my early(71-72) control arms out for late(73-87) arms, will my alignment be affected?
I know the upper balljoints are a different diameter, but will still bolt in place. The shaft pivot points will obviously be the same, but are the balljoint distances from the shaft equal? Also, is the bottom of the spring pocket on the same plane; given the same spring will there be more/less drop with one or the other? The obvious answer is: "Just go get it aligned". Just want to know if I can bypass this. Thanks -Chris
__________________
-Chris Instagram _elgringoloco_ '70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10 ‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd '72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD) '72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD) '05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD) ‘07 Yukon Denali (daily) Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy Last edited by gringoloco; 09-04-2007 at 07:13 PM. |
09-04-2007, 07:55 PM | #2 |
A guy with a truck
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,921
|
Re: Early vs. late control arms
Here's a diagram expalining what I mean:
__________________
-Chris Instagram _elgringoloco_ '70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10 ‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd '72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD) '72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD) '05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD) ‘07 Yukon Denali (daily) Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy |
09-05-2007, 12:18 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mesa,Az
Posts: 3,981
|
Re: Early vs. late control arms
I snapped a few pics for ya on a comparison. Looks like the spring cups are a little different, but as far as my tape measure says the distances are the same (that's what I though, but I wanted to verify first). Be careful though... that tape measure has been known to be off by an inch every now and again!
__________________
www.PorterbuiltFabrication.com Phone: 480-297-2621 E-mail: sales@pbfab.com Find us on FaceBook under Porterbuilt Fabrication Specializing in Chassis and Suspension Components for your Classic Chevrolet Truck. We offer components from the following manufacturers: Porterbuilt Accuair Ridetech (Air Ride Technologies) Air Lift Wilwood Intro Unisteer ECE Gotta Show Air Lift Borgeson CPP Supporting this forum since 2003! |
09-05-2007, 06:37 AM | #4 |
A guy with a truck
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,921
|
Re: Early vs. late control arms
Thanks Nate, that's exactly what I was looking for. The difference in pockets is actualy why I'm swapping. The 73-up is much shallower/wider, allowing a shorter cup which means more drop and a few more PSI for the front at ride height.
I also seem to remember something about the cross-shaft locating stud being diferent between the early/late crossmembers. Anyone run into this?
__________________
-Chris Instagram _elgringoloco_ '70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10 ‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd '72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD) '72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD) '05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD) ‘07 Yukon Denali (daily) Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy |
09-05-2007, 08:36 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: johnstown, NY
Posts: 2,393
|
Re: Early vs. late control arms
one difference that I notice is the angle of the shock mount. The later style would come in handy for me right now because I wanted to fab up an upper shock mount, but the shock would hit the upper control arm. So I might have to adjust the positioning of that lower shock mount to something like what I see in the picture of the later control arm. sorry, just rambling...
|
09-05-2007, 11:40 AM | #6 |
Texas Big Wig
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mineola, Texas
Posts: 5,620
|
Re: Early vs. late control arms
On mine I have 85 A-arms & never got to see the 67 ones, cuz the PO had already changed them out for some later year
From what I have heard, the earlier A-arms are narrower than the later ones & it makes sense to me The locating pins on mine do not line up !!! & if the A-arms were narrower I would have less clearance issues Hope this helps mang |
09-06-2007, 12:01 PM | #7 |
On the fast track to nowhere..
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Splendora, Texas
Posts: 5,316
|
Re: Early vs. late control arms
My 85 arms lined up fine with my 71 crossmember locating studs. As long as you don't ahve a sectioned crossmember you should be fine.
__________________
-Mike Owen- Norwood, Houston, Cecilia, Jackson, Monroe and counting |
Bookmarks |
|
|