|
|
|
01-04-2009, 05:52 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: central indiana
Posts: 128
|
brake question for 65
my dad is building a 65 shortbed and is wanting to convert to disc front. i told him that 71 or 72 spindles and brakes will work, after reading on here a little bit everyone is saying that you have to run 71/72 control arms. what is the difference in the years, can't you just change the ball joints? any help is appreciated.
|
|
|
|
01-04-2009, 11:10 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
|
Re: brake question for 65
You can just change the ball joints. The one item required that drum brake trucks don't have is the disc brake drag link. It has different size holes for the later/larger disc brake style tie-rods. Aftermarket companies sell 'adapter' tie-rod sleeves to accomplish the task.
I found it was easier to use 73 & later stuff. Grab the spindles plus all related hardware & swap them in using 73-up BJ's, tie-rods, & drag link. The older idler & pitman arm will still work w/the newer stuff.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. Last edited by SCOTI; 01-04-2009 at 11:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
01-04-2009, 11:25 PM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 13,821
|
Re: brake question for 65
__________________
 CHEVY ONLY
|
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
