The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-15-2009, 02:43 PM   #1
BMSJaX
Registered User
 
BMSJaX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Trabuco Canyon, CA
Posts: 173
My 307 rebuild... yes a 307

So I picked up a 307 outta a '69 c-10. It was stripped down when I got it and 90% of the parts came with it and all for $40! This block is not intended for any major HP so don't worry about cost vs a 350. The block just needs a hone and a clean up and fresh paint job. Heads will need to be rebuilt as the valve seals were leaking and the motor burnt oil bad. Here are some pics of the pistons that i've been cleaning up. They looked unusable at first but after letting them soak in degreaser for a while and a bead blast they look real good. The mold shop behind my work has a hot tank that they're gonna let me put them in to get the last of the glass bead/gunk out of them.
Attached Images
  
__________________
1964 Chevy C10 a.k.a. Julie Ann
H.E.I. cause its better to be pointless
BMSJaX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2009, 03:04 PM   #2
Corts60
Just here to tinker
 
Corts60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 3,697
Re: My 307 rebuild... yes a 307

Nice work! It's good to have something different!
Corts60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2009, 03:16 PM   #3
BMSJaX
Registered User
 
BMSJaX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Trabuco Canyon, CA
Posts: 173
Re: My 307 rebuild... yes a 307

Having something other than a 350(which is already in the truck) doesn't bother me at all, but man some people get all upset when you rebuild something different! Something about cost effectiveness... 90% complete 307 for $40... or 350 bare block for $100(if your lucky)... hhmmm, I'm not great at math but.... hahahaha
__________________
1964 Chevy C10 a.k.a. Julie Ann
H.E.I. cause its better to be pointless
BMSJaX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2009, 03:35 PM   #4
MacAttack
283 Drama Queen
 
MacAttack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Surf City, CA
Posts: 2,435
Re: My 307 rebuild... yes a 307

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMSJaX View Post
but man some people get all upset when you rebuild something different!
I never let people get upset regarding my truck work - if they're willing to pay for their ideas regarding my vehicles.

Mac.
__________________
For about 12 years of my adult life I had a severe speech impediment.
My ex-wife never let me get a word in edgewise.
MacAttack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2009, 03:38 PM   #5
BMSJaX
Registered User
 
BMSJaX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Trabuco Canyon, CA
Posts: 173
Re: My 307 rebuild... yes a 307

hahahaha, i'm gonna have to remember that one! very nice!
__________________
1964 Chevy C10 a.k.a. Julie Ann
H.E.I. cause its better to be pointless
BMSJaX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2009, 04:10 PM   #6
protrash64
Resistance is Futile
 
protrash64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mesa,Arizona
Posts: 3,520
Re: My 307 rebuild... yes a 307

Had one in a 69 Chevelle and thought it was a great engine....driving from AZ to IL it would get nearly 20mpg with a Holley and headers. One of the original factory 'stroker' motors.
__________________
64 CHEVY PICK-UP > http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...otrash+re-hash
64 CARRYALL >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1964+suburban
66 LB >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=427852
STRENGTH/DETERMINATION/MERCILESS/FOREVER
.......posted via stationary device
protrash64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 03:55 PM   #7
Chuck78
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 197
Re: My 307 rebuild... yes a 307

The vortec combustion chamber design (shared with the LS1 and fastburn also I believe) is hands down proven to be the most efficient combustion chamber that GM has ever made on a V8, so I'm sure the vortec will get far better milege than the old 307 heads. I think I recall someone stating that they flow better at a street rpm range than the fabled camel hump/double hump heads, which have 2.02 intake valves even compared to the 1.94 vortecs, and they also get much better gas mileage than those.

With gas prices creeping back up, I am really wishing that I had kept that old 307 for such an occasion!

One side note, at the time I had it, I was considering doing an oddball 307 with a longer stroke and 5.7 rods, and I actually found an AMC piston that had a very similar bore and was the correct pin location and piston height to use a longer stroke sbc crank. You couldn't have bored the 307 out .020 or 030, it would have been like .033 or something close (would have been .020 or something for the AMC engine). I browsed a manufacturer's entire catalog of pistons to find that. I think it was a 6 cylinder. It would have worked out to about a 332 or 334 cid I think?
__________________
Chuck in Ohio
*1962 GMC 1000 Panel Truck - 305D/Saginaw 4sp soon: 351C V6 + AX15 5sp OD trans, & 75-87/91 disc brake front end
*1988 Suzuki Samurai 4x4 project, VW 1.9L mTDI, Toyota R151F transmission & Toyota full floater axles, LWB body tub stretch project
*Many 1977-1979 Suzuki GS motorcycles, Kawasaki KDX220R, '77 Suzuki PE250, etc
Chuck78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com