Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
03-05-2010, 11:57 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: brandon, ms
Posts: 385
|
1960 disc conversion your opinion
I have a 1960 and want to do a 5 lug disc conversion. in your opinion would you swap to a later model crossmember or do an aftermarket conversion with drop spindles and leave the torsions?
|
03-06-2010, 12:24 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wichita Ks.
Posts: 130
|
Re: 1960 disc conversion your opinion
I had rebuilt my front end already so I went with a Early classic dropped kit. If your front end is needing rebuilt I would not spend the money, instead I'd try a crossmember swap. That is just a couple of way to do this. Also was told to keep truck brakes on a truck not to install car brakes on it.
Later Ben |
03-06-2010, 12:31 AM | #3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: brandon, ms
Posts: 385
|
Re: 1960 disc conversion your opinion
Quote:
|
|
03-06-2010, 12:50 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wichita Ks.
Posts: 130
|
Re: 1960 disc conversion your opinion
Some places offer a kit that will let you use car rotors on stock spindles. I replaced the spindle with a 2 1/2 in. drop. It went on my original ball joints.Cost me 1200.00 but I got booster, master cyclinder and poporioning ( sp) valve every thing needed for installing power disc brakes
|
03-06-2010, 02:08 AM | #5 |
Just here to tinker
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 3,697
|
Re: 1960 disc conversion your opinion
I say keep the torsions. It is a great ride, it is already on there and you can still get drop spindles for it. Why do extra work for nothing? None of these trucks are going to handle like a porche so just stick with what works.
__________________
78 C10 SWB Diesel #1 (wrecked)http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...1978+silverado 78 C10 SWB Diesel #2 (sold)http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=650751 60 GMC Suburban (sold)http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=445526 60 GMC 1000 (sold)http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=298235 67 GMC 1500 (sold) http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=803695 73 Chevy C20(Daily)http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=852767 86 Suburban(summer unit) http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=810697 88 Suburban 4x4(sold) |
03-06-2010, 08:49 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wichita Ks.
Posts: 130
|
Re: 1960 disc conversion your opinion
Don't forget power steering. Makes a world of difference!
|
03-06-2010, 09:47 AM | #7 | |
Senior Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: shellman bluff, GA
Posts: 1,411
|
Re: 1960 disc conversion your opinion
Quote:
As I understand it, the drawbacks to the T-bar setup are the expensive ball joints and the wheel bearings. Also, the amount of drop available, if you plan to slam, is limited. You can get pretty low but you start to run into issues with the T-bar bolts. Spindles are available (for around $200) that use TRUCK components which are available at retail parts suppliers or your local wrecking yard or parts truck. This takes care of any issues with the wheel bearings. As mentioned in the previous post, think about the power steering upgrade! Also, as CORT said, T-bars ride great, back in the old days (my day ) people thought that the change to coils in later years was a step backwards. If you haven't made a decision on the rear yet (I read your other post), you might want to find a later model donor and swap front and rear, might be more cost effective.
__________________
Larry Last edited by fleetsidelarry; 03-06-2010 at 10:06 AM. Reason: added the note about the rear axle |
|
03-06-2010, 01:17 PM | #8 |
Senior Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Posts: 8,356
|
Re: 1960 disc conversion your opinion
The torsion bar setup along with the early frame was over engineered, much stronger and more expensive than the later design. I imagine the new design in 63 was a substantial cost savings. If the cost of replacing the obsolete parts isn't an issue there's nothing wrong with the T-Bar setup, unless as noted above you want to drop the stance.
I swapped a 75 coil suspension in my 60 GMC because I also wanted 5 lug wheels, but primarily due to the cost of constantly replacing the inferior ball bearings now available at outrageous prices. Years later I read a thread somewhere explaining you can swap in 62-63? spindles which have roller bearings, keeping the torsion bar setup but getting rid of the ball bearings. Had I known this at the time I may have kept the stock suspension. I picked up the front half of a donor truck for $75, and everything essentially bolted in. If you want to swap the rear end as well it might be even cheaper to buy a complete truck for parts. Another plus of the swap is suspension and steering parts are really cheap for the later components, and the disc brakes are an added bonus. The swap isn't that difficult and could probably be accomplished in a weekend. Should you want to go that way here's a link that shows the details: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=366850 |
Bookmarks |
|
|