|
07-15-2010, 12:50 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Whitehorse YK Canada
Posts: 2,651
|
1959 U Joints
I took my mainly stock 1959 GMC out for a drive tonight and coming home it has a vibration between 20 - 45 mph. I am wondering if it is a u-joint. It would vibrate under power and not off power.
Are these u-joints a common piece? Are they still easily available?
__________________
Blaine 59 GMC 9314 a.k.a. Whoopee 68 C20 50th Anniversary a.k.a. The Rat http://www.flickr.com/photos/northerngmc/ http://www.members.tripod.com/P-wee/index_032.htm 1.61803 is one H of a lot better than 3.14159, no really it is! |
07-15-2010, 05:28 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Overland Park, Ks.
Posts: 5,229
|
Re: 1959 U Joints
They could very well be causing the problem. With the trans in neutral get under the truck & grab the drive shaft. There should be no play in the U-joints either twisting or up & down. If that seems OK pull the drive shaft out & make sure the joints turn both directions without binding. If they have a binding place they should be replaced. They are common parts available at any parts store.
|
07-15-2010, 10:10 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 2,454
|
Re: 1959 U Joints
One piece or two piece driveshaft? If two piece, check the center bearing support first. The rubber in these rots away after a while and lets the bearing move around when it is under load.
If one piece, check the U-joints for play as already suggested. The U-joints are still available from almost any parts store, and they are not expensive. Ray |
07-16-2010, 11:04 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Whitehorse YK Canada
Posts: 2,651
|
Re: 1959 U Joints
Thanks guys, yes it is a one piece drive shaft. I will get it and pull it this weekend.
__________________
Blaine 59 GMC 9314 a.k.a. Whoopee 68 C20 50th Anniversary a.k.a. The Rat http://www.flickr.com/photos/northerngmc/ http://www.members.tripod.com/P-wee/index_032.htm 1.61803 is one H of a lot better than 3.14159, no really it is! |
07-17-2010, 03:15 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Whitehorse YK Canada
Posts: 2,651
|
Re: 1959 U Joints
Well job done and thought I would report back for others.
Front u joint was wrecked. Grease nipple was out of it and one cup the needle bearings were gone. Both u joints are the same and very standard, a 369, and were in stock. Parts guy said if it had a heavy duty manual transmission that the front u joint would be a larger one. Drives great again.
__________________
Blaine 59 GMC 9314 a.k.a. Whoopee 68 C20 50th Anniversary a.k.a. The Rat http://www.flickr.com/photos/northerngmc/ http://www.members.tripod.com/P-wee/index_032.htm 1.61803 is one H of a lot better than 3.14159, no really it is! |
07-17-2010, 04:26 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 2,454
|
Re: 1959 U Joints
Thank you for the feedback. It's always good to hear how these things work out.
Ray |
Bookmarks |
|
|