Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
08-10-2010, 10:01 PM | #1 |
On a budget like Fred Sanford
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 2,031
|
front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
What all is different in the front brake system between the 1" and 1.25" rotors? Is it just the rotors and spindle or are the calipers and pads different too? I've got 1.25" rotors on my truck and want to swap to the 1" setup to fit the new lowering spindles I picked up. What all parts do I need?
__________________
'85 Silverado swb: 383 stroker, 10.5:1, vortec heads, 232/238 roller cam, RPM air gap, performer 750 carb, stainless longtubes, 3" duals/super 44's, T56/4.11 383ci build / exterior refresh thread '98 Camaro z28: 370ci twin turbo 370ci build '01 Tahoe LT 4x4: 5.3, longtubes/ory, magnaflow duals, custom tune....wife's DD |
08-10-2010, 10:06 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 1,671
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
You will indeed need the rotors (of course) and calipers as well, and with that I believe pads, but can't quote me on that.
__________________
2006 GMC Sierra CCSB, 6.0 swap 2000 Chevy C3500 Crew Cab shortbed dually 1999 Chevy c2500 Crew Cab shortbed 1982 El Camino 350/350 1979 K5 2wd blazer bagged/bodied 1986 Monte Carlo SS 1991 Chevy CK SWB-67 clip and tailgate, bagged 350/700r4 1955 Chevy Bel Air 2014 Chevy Silverado ccsb |
08-11-2010, 02:52 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: pueblo CO
Posts: 86
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
i did this same swap the pads are the same you will need calipers rotors and brake lines for the 11x2" brake set up
|
08-11-2010, 09:03 AM | #4 |
On a budget like Fred Sanford
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 2,031
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
The rubber brake lines are different too?
__________________
'85 Silverado swb: 383 stroker, 10.5:1, vortec heads, 232/238 roller cam, RPM air gap, performer 750 carb, stainless longtubes, 3" duals/super 44's, T56/4.11 383ci build / exterior refresh thread '98 Camaro z28: 370ci twin turbo 370ci build '01 Tahoe LT 4x4: 5.3, longtubes/ory, magnaflow duals, custom tune....wife's DD |
08-11-2010, 09:41 AM | #5 |
67-72 parts collector,…
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,701
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
No.
EDIT: I stand corrected by post below.
__________________
Keith Convert to disc brakes. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823 Last edited by lolife99; 08-12-2010 at 08:48 PM. |
08-11-2010, 12:13 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: pueblo CO
Posts: 86
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
yes the ends that go on the calibers are different first pic is for 1.25" set up and second is for 1"
|
08-12-2010, 01:37 AM | #7 |
I really hate wet sanding!
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brookfield, MO
Posts: 601
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
Are the wheel bearings, races, and grease seals the same....not that it matters to me but the original poster will probably need to know this.
__________________
Jeff, 68 C-10 75 C-20, now a C-10! 10 F-150 |
08-12-2010, 01:52 AM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: pueblo CO
Posts: 86
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
forgot that part but yes they are different
|
08-12-2010, 10:17 AM | #9 |
On a budget like Fred Sanford
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 2,031
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
Thanks guys, yet another parts store run tonight I guess!
This budget lowering job (shackles/hangers/spindles) has now cost me over twice as much as I planned on, and about 5x as much time. I need a new (cheaper) hobby.....
__________________
'85 Silverado swb: 383 stroker, 10.5:1, vortec heads, 232/238 roller cam, RPM air gap, performer 750 carb, stainless longtubes, 3" duals/super 44's, T56/4.11 383ci build / exterior refresh thread '98 Camaro z28: 370ci twin turbo 370ci build '01 Tahoe LT 4x4: 5.3, longtubes/ory, magnaflow duals, custom tune....wife's DD |
08-12-2010, 07:48 PM | #10 | ||
just can't cover up my redneck
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
Quote:
A well engineered kit is far easier to deal with and generally pretty predictable. (lowering or lifting)
__________________
You can review the site's rules here. Quote:
Bad planning on your part does not necessarily constitute an instant emergency on my part.... The great thing about being a pessimist is that you are either pleasantly surprised or right. |
||
08-13-2010, 10:40 AM | #11 | |
On a budget like Fred Sanford
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 2,031
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
Quote:
__________________
'85 Silverado swb: 383 stroker, 10.5:1, vortec heads, 232/238 roller cam, RPM air gap, performer 750 carb, stainless longtubes, 3" duals/super 44's, T56/4.11 383ci build / exterior refresh thread '98 Camaro z28: 370ci twin turbo 370ci build '01 Tahoe LT 4x4: 5.3, longtubes/ory, magnaflow duals, custom tune....wife's DD |
|
08-13-2010, 10:52 AM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Waller, TX
Posts: 57
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
Never had an issue with Driveshaft length though. You must have put a manual trans in your truck, most came with an Auto? I never had issues with Drive shaft length when lowering a standard amount, like 2,4,6 inch drop kits for rear.
__________________
2004 Chevy Silverado 1500 RCSB 4.8v8 5 speed 2002 GMC Sierra 1500 RCSB 4.8v8 auto (wifes truck) 1986 Chevy Caprice 5.0 auto (like driving a couch down the road) 1982 Chevy C30 Crew Cab 2wd LWB - Beater Truck (I have more!) Too many to list! |
08-13-2010, 04:37 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,316
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
Potential dumb question, but the 1" vs. 1.25" refers to the thickness of the rotors right?
__________________
2009 Honda Fit CfC (bsf 44.9 mpg) 2000 Tahoe Limited 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 2wd, will end up swb, not dually and replace CCswb below 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 4x4, just going to fix things up for now 1982/1989 K5/GMC Jimmy 2wd 1987 GMC 1/2 ton swb 2wd Crew (sold) |
08-13-2010, 05:34 PM | #14 | ||
just can't cover up my redneck
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
Quote:
Yes, not so dumb either. Someone else wanted to know too....they just didn't ask.
__________________
You can review the site's rules here. Quote:
Bad planning on your part does not necessarily constitute an instant emergency on my part.... The great thing about being a pessimist is that you are either pleasantly surprised or right. |
||
08-14-2010, 09:15 AM | #15 | |
On a budget like Fred Sanford
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 2,031
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
Quote:
shimp: Yes I swapped the M21 into my truck and the drive shaft isn't the original. I don't remember what I got it from, but it fit so I used it! Was just an inch too long after dropping the truck 4".
__________________
'85 Silverado swb: 383 stroker, 10.5:1, vortec heads, 232/238 roller cam, RPM air gap, performer 750 carb, stainless longtubes, 3" duals/super 44's, T56/4.11 383ci build / exterior refresh thread '98 Camaro z28: 370ci twin turbo 370ci build '01 Tahoe LT 4x4: 5.3, longtubes/ory, magnaflow duals, custom tune....wife's DD |
|
04-25-2017, 07:29 AM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,237
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
Here's the brake release chart for '87 (should be the same for '85 - I just happened to have this one handy).
The 1" rotor goes on the manual brake applications (JB1), and the lightest duty power system (JB3). The majority of the vehicles were built with the 1.25 rotor (JB5 system). K
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly 1979-1986 GM Full Size Truck Engineering 1986 - 2019 Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926 My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524 Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/ |
04-25-2017, 08:27 AM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,082
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
The difference in spindles (Which ones do I have?) can be verified by checking what wheel bearings fit since the 1" brake rotors use different (inner?) bearings.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
04-26-2017, 01:55 AM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 10
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
Well i picked up some bearings from the parts store and apparently i have the spindles that go with the 1.25" rotors so the camaro rotor swap is out unless i get aftermarket lowering spindles or stock 1" spindles. Since the truck is not a DD im having the rotors drilled for now while decide. Thanks for the info.
|
04-26-2017, 11:57 PM | #19 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Clovis, NM
Posts: 2,705
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
Quote:
__________________
2018 Audi S5- wife's ride 1980 Chevy Scottsdale http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=543511 1981 Chevy Silverado- in pieces 1964 Chevy c10 2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU |
|
04-27-2017, 02:06 AM | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 10
|
Re: front brakes: 1" vs 1.25"
Found me some rotors with literally no wear but had them turned just to make sure i start fresh. Got new bearings then had them re drilled. The drilling was done with a CNC machine and the quality is very good. I thought the holes were kinda close to each other for my liking but i liked the fact that the support lugs on the back remained intact. here is a picture of the front and back.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|