The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-11-2010, 06:28 PM   #1
BossHogg69
motor exploder
 
BossHogg69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,346
Fabbed trailing arms - need advice

Like the title says, I'm going to attempt making a set of trailiing arms for my truck. Does anyone see a problem with doing this from 2x3 .120" rectangular tubing? I'm not running bags, just want something with less twist than the stock arms. I plan to run a 15/16" rear sway bar from an IROC-Z that will be used with the fabbed arms. Thoughts?
__________________
Adam

1969 Chevy CST/10 stepside, DART Big M/TREMEC Magnum Extreme/3.73's w/Detroit Truetrac
1965 Chevy Bel Air Wagon (daily driver), 327/TH350,10 bolt w/3.08's
1961 Chevy Bel Air Sport Coupe, ZZ454/M21/9" rear w/3.50's & Detroit Truetrac
2005 GMC 1500 ccsb 2wd, 6.0L/4L65e/3.73 G80
2006 GMC 2500HD ccsb 4x4, DMax LBZ/Allison 6spd/4.56's w/Detroit TrueTrac

Use the SEARCH function on this forum - it is your friend!!
BossHogg69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2010, 09:10 PM   #2
Wild83C10
Registered User
 
Wild83C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 910
Re: Fabbed trailing arms - need advice

Someone made some adjustable trailing arms out of rectagular tubing. Do a quick search in this section it should pop up.
__________________
83 C10 Stepside (SOLD, it was a blast!)

383 MASS-FLO EFI/TKO II 600/3.90 Posi 10 bolt
S475 and C4 DM running, fine tuning
turbo=
Douchebag Racing: Runs Fine all the Time
Wild83C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2010, 09:43 PM   #3
vin63
It's Better With Nitro
 
vin63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chino Hills, CA
Posts: 2,262
Re: Fabbed trailing arms - need advice

Just in case...http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...+trailing+arms
__________________
1963 C-10: Deluxe-optioned cab, shortbed, fleetside
Pontiac 462 ci, Kauffman D-Port alum. heads
4L80E, narrowed sheetmetal Ford 9-inch
Tubular front and rear suspension
Custom 6-piston front disc and 4-piston rear disc brakes
vin63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2010, 12:52 AM   #4
BossHogg69
motor exploder
 
BossHogg69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,346
Re: Fabbed trailing arms - need advice

I saw that thread and it's very good. Nuke used 3/16" 2x3 and ballistic joints at the front of the TA. I don't want to use the swivel joints because I have no need for the articulation those joints offer. I'm building a Pro Touring truck and need the roll resistance that a solid mount offers. I also have an adjustable PorterBuilt TA crossmember, so that is what I'll use to adjust get the wheels centered in the wheelwell. I just wanted to know if .120" wall would be strong enough and still offer a little flexibility, but not as much as a stock arm. I actually have two rear sway bars, on is 7/8" and the other is 15/16", I was gonna try both and see which one worked better with the fabbed arms.
__________________
Adam

1969 Chevy CST/10 stepside, DART Big M/TREMEC Magnum Extreme/3.73's w/Detroit Truetrac
1965 Chevy Bel Air Wagon (daily driver), 327/TH350,10 bolt w/3.08's
1961 Chevy Bel Air Sport Coupe, ZZ454/M21/9" rear w/3.50's & Detroit Truetrac
2005 GMC 1500 ccsb 2wd, 6.0L/4L65e/3.73 G80
2006 GMC 2500HD ccsb 4x4, DMax LBZ/Allison 6spd/4.56's w/Detroit TrueTrac

Use the SEARCH function on this forum - it is your friend!!
BossHogg69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2010, 12:58 AM   #5
WellBilt Kustoms
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 384
Re: Fabbed trailing arms - need advice

I think using 2" X 3" .120 wall tubing will be fine. Thats what I would go with if I were building a pair.

Post up some pics when your done! Have fun!
WellBilt Kustoms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2010, 01:32 AM   #6
BossHogg69
motor exploder
 
BossHogg69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,346
Re: Fabbed trailing arms - need advice

Believe me, I'll have all kinds of pics posted up when I get the chassis into a roller. It's been a slow process so far, but hopefully I can get motivated and fire my welder up soon!
__________________
Adam

1969 Chevy CST/10 stepside, DART Big M/TREMEC Magnum Extreme/3.73's w/Detroit Truetrac
1965 Chevy Bel Air Wagon (daily driver), 327/TH350,10 bolt w/3.08's
1961 Chevy Bel Air Sport Coupe, ZZ454/M21/9" rear w/3.50's & Detroit Truetrac
2005 GMC 1500 ccsb 2wd, 6.0L/4L65e/3.73 G80
2006 GMC 2500HD ccsb 4x4, DMax LBZ/Allison 6spd/4.56's w/Detroit TrueTrac

Use the SEARCH function on this forum - it is your friend!!
BossHogg69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2010, 04:18 AM   #7
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
Re: Fabbed trailing arms - need advice

Quote:
Originally Posted by BossHogg69 View Post
I saw that thread and it's very good. Nuke used 3/16" 2x3 and ballistic joints at the front of the TA. I don't want to use the swivel joints because I have no need for the articulation those joints offer. I'm building a Pro Touring truck and need the roll resistance that a solid mount offers. I also have an adjustable PorterBuilt TA crossmember, so that is what I'll use to adjust get the wheels centered in the wheelwell. I just wanted to know if .120" wall would be strong enough and still offer a little flexibility, but not as much as a stock arm. I actually have two rear sway bars, on is 7/8" and the other is 15/16", I was gonna try both and see which one worked better with the fabbed arms.
It would seem that eliminating the twist the OE 'beam' type arms have while using the same type of bushing @ the front will increase inherent binding issues. Suspension bind while pushing the limits of adhesion in a corner (what pro-touring is all about) could possibly result in an inconsistent grip which is not a good thing.

The reduction in flex from the tube construction is a good idea. But it would seem to work better w/the swivel type joint in front to allow articulation vs. bind.

Just another perspective....
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2010, 10:00 AM   #8
BossHogg69
motor exploder
 
BossHogg69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,346
Re: Fabbed trailing arms - need advice

Wellbilt -those arms are WICKED!!! nice work!

As for the swivel joints, it just seems like they offer so much articulation that the trailing arm would never get a chance to work as it was designed to. I could be wrong, but he swivel joints seem to remove any 'anti-sway' properties that using a stiffer trailing arm would offer.
__________________
Adam

1969 Chevy CST/10 stepside, DART Big M/TREMEC Magnum Extreme/3.73's w/Detroit Truetrac
1965 Chevy Bel Air Wagon (daily driver), 327/TH350,10 bolt w/3.08's
1961 Chevy Bel Air Sport Coupe, ZZ454/M21/9" rear w/3.50's & Detroit Truetrac
2005 GMC 1500 ccsb 2wd, 6.0L/4L65e/3.73 G80
2006 GMC 2500HD ccsb 4x4, DMax LBZ/Allison 6spd/4.56's w/Detroit TrueTrac

Use the SEARCH function on this forum - it is your friend!!
BossHogg69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com