|
01-13-2011, 09:25 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: post falls id
Posts: 81
|
transmission question
is it odd that a 60 gmc 1/2 ton fleet would have a 4 speed hydromatic tranmission behind the 305 v6? or is that just what they came with for an automatic?
|
01-13-2011, 09:29 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sidney,b.c.
Posts: 4,425
|
Re: transmission question
that is what they came with from about 53 or 54-62. Same hydramatic as used in 54-56 olds and caddies.
why is it odd? ron |
01-13-2011, 09:46 PM | #3 |
CLASSIX Truck Club
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lodi Ca
Posts: 318
|
Re: transmission question
What 4 speed?
|
01-13-2011, 10:36 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sidney,b.c.
Posts: 4,425
|
Re: transmission question
|
01-13-2011, 11:34 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: post falls id
Posts: 81
|
Re: transmission question
was unsure, thought they had 3 speed hydromatics
|
01-13-2011, 11:53 PM | #6 |
Senior Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Posts: 8,356
|
Re: transmission question
It isn’t “odd”, but it certainly is rare. Automatic transmissions in any of these trucks were rare, even more so with the GMC’s.
The 4 speed Hydramatic was also the basis for the famous B&M Hydro Stick racing transmission. They were industrial strength (and very heavy) and could be made to really slam into gear, and the first automatic transmission to be competitive against a stick shift. Here are a couple of comments from the B&M website: “In the 50s it was B&M who came up with the idea of using a performance reinforced Hydramatic for racing”. “B&M Automotive Products was founded by Bob Spar and Mort Schuman (B&M) in 1953. In 1955, Bob's brother Don went to work for B&M. Soon after, B&M produced the only patented 4-speed automatic racing transmission in history, known as the famous B&M Hydro Stick”. |
01-14-2011, 01:13 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sidney,b.c.
Posts: 4,425
|
Re: transmission question
they were not that rare. I just got rid of one a few months ago that I had.
ron |
01-14-2011, 01:32 AM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Windsor, NY
Posts: 51
|
Re: transmission question
I have a jasper 350 sbc and a 2 speed powerglide behind that. what effects will that have on the 350 and original rear end? not to mention my daily driving habits?
|
01-14-2011, 10:36 AM | #9 |
Senior Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: shellman bluff, GA
Posts: 1,411
|
Re: transmission question
Markeb, there was an informative writeup in the Shopmanual section of the January, 2010 issue of Street Rodder magazine about these transmissions, in which, along with other information, similar statements were made. A reader responded (in the March issue) with the clarifying information that, in fact, a Cadillac Motors employee (Jack Leidgen, who had been involved with the development of the heavy-duty hydramatic tank transmission parts), was building racing hydramatics as early as 1950 and that, in 1951 (2 years before B&M), Cadillac published a spec sheet listing the parts that would be used to build a modified hydramatic and that these were the parts used (at least early on, I assume) by B&M.
__________________
Larry |
Bookmarks |
|
|