Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
04-24-2011, 02:43 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Placentia, California
Posts: 567
|
2.2 Gas-Mileage figures, and related BS
I've been mileage-looping my '00 S-10 now for over ten years, and here's a portion of what I've learned.
First off the little buggers don't like hills. They'll get great gas mileage all day long if you don't make them go up a hill. My '94 Z-28 got better mileage going to SEMA from LA than my S-10 did the year before. Not only that, the Camaro got there an hour sooner. The Z-28 got 22, and the S-10 got 21. Where the 4-bangers shine is in stop and go traffic. My last tank of gas I got 21MPG city with a little freeway thrown in. Most of the time I was running the A/C, with my foot on the floor. In retrospect I wish I had bought a V6, but if the $6.00 a-gallon gas prices the LA news stations are predicting for the summer comes true, the 2.2 will be a little easier to tolerate. I've never gotten over 28MPG, and I wonder how the heck anyone can milk higher mileage out of one? Are these real figures where gallons are divided into miles, or just wishful guessing? Oh, and if you're thinking about buying something to take the sting off driving your fullsize daily, buy an S-10, those little Japanese cars are for girls. |
04-24-2011, 09:49 PM | #2 |
BAD BOW-Silverado XST
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Senior Member from Austin, TX
Posts: 6,431
|
Re: 2.2 Gas-Mileage figures, and related BS
Put a bed cover on it! You need to reduce the drag!
|
04-24-2011, 11:14 PM | #3 |
K5Camper
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 1,513
|
Re: 2.2 Gas-Mileage figures, and related BS
I'm getting 24-25 mpg with a 97 2wd running a v6/5-speed on the highway. That is with a few good hills to climb up and down on my daily commute. I do have a bed cover on it too.
__________________
Rob Z. 1975 K5 350/465/205/D44/12b 4" lift on 35's- RIP 1991 K5 8.1L/NV4500/241/D44/14b FWC Camper |
04-25-2011, 10:23 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Placentia, California
Posts: 567
|
Re: 2.2 Gas-Mileage figures, and related BS
Among a lot of other things: Not over the rails, but I've wanted to put a flush fitting bed lid on it since new. I guess beside the cost I've held back because I haul motorcycles and stuff that sticks up way above the bed. I guess something light I could easily remove would be the ticket.
Yeah, I'm sure the 4.3 does better on the highway for mileage. 24-25 is pretty good, and I'm sure your V6 gets there faster. As soon as I do a few things exhaust, hot coils, new plugs and wires I'm going to run up north which will include up the Grapevine floored to see what I'm getting on the highway. A turbo is also on the list, but maybe since they don't smog legally in CA. and the cost is more than a low-buck story maybe not... we'll see. |
04-26-2011, 08:05 PM | #5 |
blood type; Retumbo
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: next to my reloading bench
Posts: 10,269
|
Re: 2.2 Gas-Mileage figures, and related BS
if getting 33 in town and 50MPG hwy is for girls then I guess I better buy a bra. LOL
FWIW my 99 Tahoe gets 21MPG hwy, 19 when pulling my boat.
__________________
Man rule #77...if you own a 67 stepside with a caddy 472 you will never be in danger of loosing you man card |
04-26-2011, 10:28 PM | #6 |
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
|
Re: 2.2 Gas-Mileage figures, and related BS
I'm getting a pretty consistent 23mpg with my truck, 99 2.2L 5spd reg cab short bed, and that's basically around town only, never really get on the highway, 50mph and under lights stop signs etc... not too shabby, better than my Z71's 13-14mpg for the same driving. I did remove the stock fan and added an electric fan and a CAI kit, but that's it. It does get 28-29mpg highway, usually closer to 28. There was one time I got over 30mpg and it was a backroads road trip, about 350 miles round trip, only 55-60mph the whole way, and I got 30.5mpg. Other than that 28 is normal for highway trips (@70-75+mph ).
__________________
Jesse James 1967 C10 SWB Stepside: 350/700R4/3.73 1965 Ford Mustang: 289/T5-5spd/3.25 Trac-Loc 1968 Pontiac Firebird: Project Fire Chicken! 2015 Silverado Double Cab 5.3L Z71 2001 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0L 5spd 2020 Chevrolet Equinox Premium 2.0L Turbo 2011 Mustang V6 ~ Wife's ride American Born, Country by the Grace of God 1967 CST Shop Truck Rebuild! My 1967 C-10 Build Thread My Vintage Air A/C Install Project "On a Dime" Trying my hand at Home Renovation! 1965 Mustang Modifications! Last edited by 67ChevyRedneck; 04-26-2011 at 10:30 PM. |
04-28-2011, 09:04 AM | #7 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Placentia, California
Posts: 567
|
Re: 2.2 Gas-Mileage figures, and related BS
Quote:
My stock fan crapped-out at 11,000 miles on the way to Texas Heatwave in '01. Right now it just spins when it wants to. |
|
04-27-2011, 11:14 PM | #8 |
the boat guy
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: springfield mo
Posts: 2,339
|
Re: 2.2 Gas-Mileage figures, and related BS
hey john I think you meant front wheel drive cars are for girls. Those japs know how to make a fun sportscar.
when I drive my moms 2.2 5speed s10 I get about the same mielage as I do with my 5.3 67. Maybe beause I hate the s10...
__________________
67, swb, fleet, tach, throttle, 5.3, 4l60e, 3.73's, fuel cell, 5 lug, p.d.b., 4-6 drop. great little truck 66, stevens drag/ski 18' silouette, 350, 2.02 doublehump heads. comp extreme marine 278 cam, vette 7 fin valve covers, old polished edelbrock intake, velvetdrive, casale v-drive, adj cavitation plate. 28, model a rpu project, |
04-28-2011, 09:00 AM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Placentia, California
Posts: 567
|
Re: 2.2 Gas-Mileage figures, and related BS
Hey Brad, that's funny I figured I'd rattle somebody's cage with that "girl car" remark. As a past editor of 3 different truck magazines my official stance is cars are good because girls have to drive something. The truth is I like just about anything.
If I really get bothered about the gas situation I'll start riding my Harley more at 40-60MPG. My '05 GMC with a 5.3 L59 get's 15MPG pulling a tandem trailer at 60MPH with any kind of shortbed truck on the back, which I think is pretty damn good considering this is averaging in the climb up the Grapevine with my foot on the floor. |
04-29-2011, 07:45 PM | #10 |
Semper Fi!!!
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sherrills Ford, North Carolina
Posts: 971
|
Re: 2.2 Gas-Mileage figures, and related BS
If your aiming for better MPG, try the following:
Replace wires, plugs, change oil, check for correct tire pressure, and MOST OF ALL REPLACE ALL o2 SENSOR'S! (o2 is the most common reason for bad MPG on 2.2's) If there is nothing in your bed, put tail gate down if you dont wanna buy a cover. Electric fan swap Cold air intake New muffler (It will sound ricccy as you know what, but if you really want more mpg....) Hope this helps!
__________________
Brandon... "IT ONLY TAKES EVERYTHING YOU GOT!!" Semper Fi |
04-30-2011, 06:59 AM | #11 |
blood type; Retumbo
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: next to my reloading bench
Posts: 10,269
|
Re: 2.2 Gas-Mileage figures, and related BS
actually a cold air intake is a bad idea for MPG. cold air doesn't support complete combustion as well as warm or hot air.
I suggest OE (AC Delco) plugs, wires, coils etc. "hot" coils will do nothing to improve upon a properly maintained powertrain in stock form. same with plugs and wires. now, if you want to play around and experiment you could try a hydrogen generator.
__________________
Man rule #77...if you own a 67 stepside with a caddy 472 you will never be in danger of loosing you man card |
05-15-2011, 12:05 PM | #12 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: indisclosed
Posts: 1,515
|
Re: 2.2 Gas-Mileage figures, and related BS
How does this engine, if at all, differ from the one in J-body's?
|
Bookmarks |
|
|