Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
01-18-2014, 04:26 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bethlehem, GA
Posts: 18
|
mcgaughy's spindles and steering bind
Hey there gang,
I just spent a couple hours sifting through threads on suspension drops, steering, and Mcgaughy's, but can't find anyone with the same issue. I purchased a set of Mcgaughy's drop spindles and six lug discs for my 69 C10. Everything seemed to be going fine until I went to put the tie rods and center-link together. For some reason they decided to maintain the outer tie rod position relative to the stub axle instead of the lower ball joint. This totally screws up the steering geometry. major bump steer issues, and the inner tie rods now hit the idler arm and pitman arm whenever I try to turn. Has anyone else run into this? |
01-18-2014, 04:34 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: strausstown pa
Posts: 3,394
|
Re: mcgaughy's spindles and steering bind
did you have the drag link out? it sounds like you have it in backwards the inner tie rods should be behind the center link the nuts are out front. this is a easy mistake too make because it will still fit. ask me how i know
__________________
81 camaro 355 4/spd 342 posi my first love. 67 swb step 454/4spd ott 373 posi 4/7 drop. 2000 s10 zr2 little blue truck that never gets stuck. '74 heald super bronc vt8. tecumseh powered moon rover. |
01-18-2014, 06:32 PM | #3 |
67-72 parts collector,…
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,700
|
Re: mcgaughy's spindles and steering bind
x2
__________________
Keith Convert to disc brakes. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823 |
01-19-2014, 08:50 PM | #4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bethlehem, GA
Posts: 18
|
Re: mcgaughy's spindles and steering bind
Quote:
As is, if I try to turn it around, the crossmember is in the way. I will take pictures and post them tomorrow. Thanks for the feedback. I converted Manual to power steering as well. bought what is supposed to be the correct pitman arm. Time to give it another look. Thanks again, Steve |
|
01-20-2014, 08:26 PM | #5 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: strausstown pa
Posts: 3,394
|
Re: mcgaughy's spindles and steering bind
Quote:
the center link is very close to the cm when the wheels are in the straight forward postion the center link will move away from the cm when the steering moves through its travel. as far as your ps i dont think there is a pitman arm that'll fit the taper of the center link and be longer(moving the center link towards the cm). the tie rods have to be mounted with the nuts forward and the tie rod joint behind the center link if not it creates a bind with all the other parts. heres some pics these should give you a idea on just how close it really is and how the tie rods are oriented.
__________________
81 camaro 355 4/spd 342 posi my first love. 67 swb step 454/4spd ott 373 posi 4/7 drop. 2000 s10 zr2 little blue truck that never gets stuck. '74 heald super bronc vt8. tecumseh powered moon rover. |
|
01-18-2014, 06:32 PM | #6 | |
67-72 parts collector,…
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,700
|
Re: mcgaughy's spindles and steering bind
Quote:
__________________
Keith Convert to disc brakes. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823 |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|