The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-26-2003, 12:59 AM   #1
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
LS1 valve covers...

I have been looking for a set of valve covers for the LS1 in my Blazer. K-Tech makes a pair, but they have Corvette cast in them. Here is a set I found this weekend at HeatWave. What do y'all think...
Attached Images
 
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2003, 01:00 AM   #2
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
Here's another view....
Attached Images
 
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2003, 01:05 AM   #3
brad2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: edmond, ok
Posts: 1,056
Smooth the surface on those and they would look pretty nice. Of course I haven't seen a lot of LS1 valve covers to compare it to.
__________________
74 swb
71 2wd Jimmy
82 2wd Blazer
brad2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2003, 01:25 AM   #4
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
Quote:
Originally posted by brad2
....I haven't seen a lot of LS1 valve covers to compare it to.
That's the problem. LS1's don't have valve covers. They have all the valve train in the head, so they have a flat lid, rather than the tradational cover like the one shown.

The LT1 or LS1 is designed to be really low profile, so it fits undr the hood of F-bodies, or Vette's. Under the hood of our trucks they look stomped on. I raised mine up as far as possible, but still need to add more height to it.....
Attached Images
 
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2003, 07:59 AM   #5
Jonboy
Slots go on anything!
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 5,957
can you get those polished? I am guessing the black rail is to relocate the coils, so that would look pretty nice.
__________________
1974 Jimmy- 5.3/4L80e/NP241
Jonboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2003, 09:40 AM   #6
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
Quote:
Originally posted by Jonboy
can you get those polished? I am guessing the black rail is to relocate the coils, so that would look pretty nice.
They don't offer them polished yet. Considering the cost, I wouldn't want to add any option from them anyway.

Yes, those coil brackets are ther icing on the cake. If it weren't for them, it would be hard to justify the expense...
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2003, 11:09 AM   #7
phantom dually
Project92 SWB stepside
 
phantom dually's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 4,792
Do some powder coating to the covers and the bracket for the coils and it will look good.
__________________
92 C1500 stepside 496 Stroker Competiton Engineering Ladder bars/QA1 coilovers. Dana 60 rear with 4.10 gear and posi. Bonspeed Palisade 20x12 in rear w/335/30/20 and 20x8.5 front w/245/40/20. 5/8 drop with Belltech springs/DJM spindles/drop shocks. WWS Progress thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=140448
phantom dually is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2003, 02:46 PM   #8
LOHRTBT
BeWarE tHe eViL CrAnkTOe!
 
LOHRTBT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Yukon, OK
Posts: 3,605
If I were you I would just get the FRC's THere are tons of custom ones and some very nice chrome kits for them from www.autobuffs.net
__________________
~Dave~
You can call me Mike, Mike Oxlong

- 1986 Chevy SWB - Stock for now
- 1986 Chevy Custom SWB *Stolen 6/26/05*
- 1985 Chevy SWB SOLD
- 1999 T/A Some mods
www.cardomain.com/id/ramairdave

AIM Screenname - Jester84
LOHRTBT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2003, 03:01 PM   #9
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
That would be too normal. The fuel rail covers can be made to look nice, but that doesn't help with the motor looking squished. I need something to add height to it.
I will probably wind up with one of these to solve the issue-
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2003, 04:08 PM   #10
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
Ken, that still gets my vote. I really liked the looks of the one we saw @ Goodguys last year. My only concern would be effort vs. end result.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2003, 09:01 PM   #11
brad2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: edmond, ok
Posts: 1,056
I really like the looks of that blown LS1. Funny you mentioned size. My Jimmy had a nice little 350 in it and I was going to use it. After we got going I thought that engine bay needs a big block. It was a size issue. Ok.......no funny jokes about size
__________________
74 swb
71 2wd Jimmy
82 2wd Blazer
brad2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2003, 12:11 AM   #12
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
Quote:
Originally posted by SCOTI
Ken, that still gets my vote. I really liked the looks of the one we saw @ Goodguys last year. My only concern would be effort vs. end result.
Yeah, me too Scot. I haven't been able to get past it yet. The 5k is still stuck in my throat, but if I swallow really hard, I might not choke...
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2003, 12:17 AM   #13
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
Quote:
Originally posted by brad2
I really like the looks of that blown LS1. Funny you mentioned size. My Jimmy had a nice little 350 in it and I was going to use it. After we got going I thought that engine bay needs a big block. It was a size issue. Ok.......no funny jokes about size
If my Blazer had started with a decent 350, I might have left it alone. It was born with a 305 that started life with only 150 hp. It had 200k miles on it when I bought it, and was running good, but not for long. It's in a better place now.

I looked hard at the 502/502 as well. I even considered the Ram Jet 502 when it came along. I decided to go with the LS1 to be different. Too bad it's taking so long to get done. Now days you can't swing a dead cat without hitting an LS1 coversion...

Our trucks are just like real life "size does matter"....
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com