Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
04-01-2016, 10:28 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: asheville nc
Posts: 151
|
Need opinions on carb vs efi
Hi, I just bought an 85' C10 SWB with a 305/SM465 4sp trans for a daily commuter. I typically travel 60 miles a day and some of it is in heavy traffic/mtn roads. I am currently making plans for what I want to do to the setup and split between throwing a new 600 carba nd aluminum intake on the 305, or putting a FAST efi with aluminum intake on. My main concern is reliability and cold starts- as I'll be driving this everyday even in the winter and I need to get to work. The other option is to LS swap it, but I would have to be very organized and knock the conversion out quick and conservative budget wise (<5K total). What do you think I should do? I've never owned a carbed vehicle before so it's all new to me, which is funny since I tune efi.
|
04-01-2016, 10:57 AM | #2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 146
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
Quote:
Your concerns about reliability and cold starts are non-issues, however, provided your carb is in good condition and set up properly. |
|
04-01-2016, 11:25 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Posts: 252
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
__________________
Folks that throw dirt on you aren't always trying to hurt you, and folks that pull you out of a jam aren't always trying to help you. |
04-01-2016, 11:44 AM | #4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: asheville nc
Posts: 151
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
Quote:
|
|
04-01-2016, 11:56 AM | #5 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 146
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
Quote:
Impossible to say; too many variables. |
|
04-03-2016, 02:53 PM | #6 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Central MN
Posts: 288
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
Quote:
The big issue with carbs today is finding quality rebuild parts.
__________________
-400/400 1979 K25 350/SM465/205/44HD/14FF 1985 K20 400/400/208/10/14 1987 V10 TBI350/700R4/208/10/10 '85 Build Thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=643968 |
|
04-01-2016, 11:37 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: OC CA
Posts: 1,374
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
FAST system is a very nice, but a very expensive EFI solution. FAST is excellent solution in high performance setup.
If you are on the budget, your engine (305) is basically stock and do not mind doing some work retrofitting TBI system from a donor vehicle that offers a low cost solution. Basically JY EFI retrofit can be done for less than $500. Done this many times - for cars, trucks, and boats. The key to swap success is planning and grabbing a complete EFI system from a donor vehicle. Trucks and vans (87 to 92) are easy donors, cars (F and B bodies) are bit more difficult to extract harness from. After market harness (numerous vendors) is a better approach since you do not have to deal with a brittle 30 year old harness and plugs. ECM (try to find donor with the same engine ) TB with all the trimmings (+complete intake, brackets, bolts, etc) Harness Distributor Coil CTS (screwed into intake) Air cleaner Assy MAP sensor KS and ESC module Fuel pump relay oil pressure switch Keep in mind that you'll need do some fuel line plumbing and get EFI tanks with internal fuel pump for best results. Use search - we have a thread here documenting details of several swaps performed by board members. //RF
__________________
"The Beast" 1975 Chevrolet C20 longbed 350/700R4! with 3inch body lift Dual Flowmasters Super 40's! TBI retrofit completed (2007-07-29) New 383CID (+030) 08-304-8 9.5:1CR x36,005 (2012-12-17) |
04-01-2016, 11:57 AM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,378
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
Back in the old days even old ladies knew how to work a choke and start a car. Now it is getting to be black magic. This country didn't come to a stop whenever it got cold. If you know how they work it is no big deal at all. I try to have my vehicles set up so any woman could jump in, kick the pedal, turn the key and put it in drive and drive away. Back in the day that was common knowledge.
I just changed a fuel pump on my GMC this morning in about 1/2 an hour taking my sweet time. I don't think fuel injection is all that simple.
__________________
76 Chevy K20 76 GMC K15 77 Chevy C10 77 Chevy K10 |
04-01-2016, 12:00 PM | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 146
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
Quote:
|
|
04-01-2016, 12:21 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 2,630
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
How good of shape is the current 305? What mileage are you getting now? Your 60 miles per day roughly equals 15,000 miles/year. You should figure your gas costs with the current setup vs your expected gas costs with whatever you might want to consider going to. You can then figure a rough number of years to break even on your investment.
A lot of folks will bad mouth a 305 but one in good shape is a good motor for a daily driver commute vehicle. As for cold/hot starts, my carb equipped truck starts just fine if it is 100+ or below 0F. Just make sure the choke is adjusted properly, the exhaust riser valve(if equipped) is still working, your THERMAC system is present and working and the PVC system works. A lot of folks take those off and install and open air cleaner, "to make more power", then wonder why their vehicle sucks as an all weather daily driver. |
04-01-2016, 01:07 PM | #11 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: asheville nc
Posts: 151
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
Quote:
|
|
04-01-2016, 12:44 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Smethport, PA
Posts: 1,213
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
Alright Casedmetal, since you are obviously very familiar with EFI this seems like a no brainer to me. They don't put carbs in vehicles any more for a reason. I agree with a couple of the previous comments that a properly tuned carb that is not worn out works just fine even in the cold. A carb, no matter how good it is, can not compete with fuel injection for cold starts. I changed my Jeep to TBI years ago and it was the best thing I could have done to it, well before I changed it to a MPFI V8, now that is the best thing. If you are considering the FAST system you should probably strongly consider a 5.3 swap for the same money, maybe less. That was the mistake I made with the Jeep. I spent a bunch of money on the Howell TBI system and should have just went with a more modern V8 powerplant from the start. I had half the money in my V8 swap than I did upgrading the old I6.
__________________
85 K30 crew cab dually - Project http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=694939 87 Wrangler Rock Crawler - Reason for the project http://www.wranglerforum.com/f330/da...ld-122601.html 04 1500 crew cab http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=786514 |
04-01-2016, 01:03 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 146
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
|
04-01-2016, 01:18 PM | #14 |
driving is in my blood
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,750
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
And performance. And adapability. No jets to change when you go up 10,000ft mountains. No carb'd engine is going to be running the 10:1+ compressions we run these days as it requires knock sensors and constant fine tuning to adjust everything.
Its like this: carbs are simple and easy to adjust. They work. EFI is more cost and setup, but then it always just works, really well.
__________________
-78 c10 short/step: 388cid, M20, 5/5 drop, lots more. Playtoy and first vehicle. -98 c1500 x-cab: 5.7L, 17" rims, 5/6 drop, flowmaster, helper bags,NBS rear disk brakes. -02 Suburban 4x4: leveled front -CBR600F4i, CBR600RR, CBR1000RR, and standup skis DISCLAIMER: I cant spell for the life of me. |
04-01-2016, 01:20 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 146
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
Yes, those are indeed advantages, but Detroit in the 1970s and '80s would never have adopted EFI across the board just for that. It took the government strong-arming them through regulation to force the move to EFI systems.
|
04-01-2016, 01:59 PM | #16 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 2,630
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
Quote:
As for having to pedal it several times, choke may be out of adjustment. Check it before starting in the morning when it is still cool. Should be closed or nearly so. |
|
04-01-2016, 01:04 PM | #17 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: asheville nc
Posts: 151
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
Quote:
|
|
04-04-2016, 11:40 AM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 146
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
I have always preferred manual-choke systems because the automatic chokes add complexity, and because I'm kind of a control freak... I prefer manual transmissions for the same reason.
But, yeah, given a carb and a working choke, most any Chevy can be made to start. You just have to know what you're doing, and there was a time when it was common knowledge. |
04-04-2016, 03:04 PM | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,191
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
To clarify, a carburetor in good condition will start in any weather, but EFI will start quicker and run better during the first few blocks due to much better fuel control and computer assist.
I had a long conversation on the phone with an east coast Qjet rebuilder and he told me that a routinely driven carburetor will not need adjustment or rebuild. Most of the problems he sees are from hobby vehicles or boats which are driven rarely and load up with gunk. However, I still think a manual choke is the best option for any vehicle with a carburetor, so you can control air/fuel mixture yourself, based on engine performance. Having said that, if I had $5K laying around I would still go with a 5.3 in a late model truck. As stated above, I think I have had 8 new vehicles with a 5.3 engine and they are nice, but not trouble free. We are still driving 30+ year old trucks and a 5.3 engine does not make them new trucks. I applaud anyone who wants to do the swap, but I just think that this is a job for someone who is really into old squares, has a lot of skill, and does not have to worry about emissions laws in their state (AZ considers engine swaps "tampering" with original vehicle equipment. Others posting here say they can get through emissions with a late model engine, but when you call the AZ DMV you get a different story.) |
04-04-2016, 10:21 PM | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prescott, Arizona
Posts: 2,396
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
We don't have any testing at all in Prescott (Yavapai) but Maricopa and Pima does (Phoenix and Tucson) One of the big reasons I bought a house up here.
However the late model engines do pass with emissions removed in those counties tested. All they are testing for as of right now is a simple OBDII plug in and scan of codes. Those codes can be switched to "no report" The car scans clean. Right now, we don't have the goofy laws that California has in place that affect the retro engine swaps. |
04-06-2016, 02:54 AM | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 34
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
I reccommend this Fitech EFI unit it will bolt onto the 4 barrel intake
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/fi...a7MaAgzr8P8HAQ |
04-06-2016, 04:51 AM | #22 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Richmond,KY and Knoxville,TN
Posts: 1,584
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
Quote:
|
|
04-06-2016, 05:03 AM | #23 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Richmond,KY and Knoxville,TN
Posts: 1,584
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
Quote:
|
|
04-06-2016, 09:59 AM | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Indpls. , IN
Posts: 795
|
Re: Need opinions on carb vs efi
The original and properly working induction system will work better and likely get better mileage than an aftermarket carb with an aluminum intake.
F.I. seems a large expense and more hassle than necessary for what now is a minor issue to solve. A well sorted dual exhaust would probably gain more mileage than F.I. alone.
__________________
Tim K. 84 K30 srw Silverado 454 auto 85 C20 350 C6P auto flatbed 94 K1500 lifted shortbed 350 4 bbl NV4500 |
Bookmarks |
|
|