The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-09-2003, 02:26 PM   #1
PrimeredThunder
Back from the Dead
 
PrimeredThunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 522
Single-Piece Driveshaft Questions

First off, I have a 72 SWB truck with trailing-arm suspension and I am contemplating converting it to a single-piece rear driveshaft because mine seems to be a bit bent and I am breaking carrier bearings a bit more often than I should How long does the single driveshaft need to be? I have a 12-bolt rearend and turbo350 trans. Also, I should add that I am running airbags, and am planning on notching the frame soon. I appreciate any help with this,
Thanks,

Kenny
__________________
The only Carb that matters to me is the one under my hood!

Salem, Oregon
PrimeredThunder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2003, 04:33 PM   #2
ShamrockCustoms
Project56 on hold
 
ShamrockCustoms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Burleson, TX
Posts: 489
http://www.iedls.com/


This company has a great rep for outstanding driveshafts and also has measurements details..Inland Empire Driveline.
ShamrockCustoms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2003, 06:08 PM   #3
68LSS1
Registered User
 
68LSS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,191
I agree with Shamrock Customs about Inland Empire being the best drive shaft company in the country. I talked to them about going to a one piece ('68 short step, coil spring rear) and they recommended me not to. I've heard the maximum length that one should be as 5' and 6' (I'm sure plenty will chime in here). They can build one warrantied for 700hp (2 piece for our trucks) and also sell heavy duty carrier bearings. The drive shaft is a slip type on the rear. I'm still going to go one piece though. I am moving the motor as back as far as possible (gonna put that shifter right beside me). Maybe trying the carrier bearing from them will work for you?
__________________
'68 Short Step
LS1/T56, Hydratech, Fatman Fabrications Stage III, Baer, Hot Rods to Hell, US Body, S&W, etc
68LSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2003, 07:57 PM   #4
crazy longhorn
Fabricate till you "puke"
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,402
I will tell you the same story! i have checked locally, & online......my longhorn is "stuck" with a 2 pc shaft. There are many shops that will build you a 1 pc shaft in that 6' range C to C on the caps......but most will tell you it will be a problem. I sure wouldnt think the shaft on a short wheel base truck would be any problem tho......if you are in the 4 -5' range, you should be able to rock with a 1 pc shaft , in the 3 1/2-4" dia range. it may take a little trimming on the crossmember, but shouldnt be a problem. Good luck,crazyL
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears....
crazy longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2003, 07:54 PM   #5
mcmlxix
Collector of Projects
 
mcmlxix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,106
I took a rough measurement today after work. I have a 71 SWB with a small block and th350 trans. It was 61" c to c ... thats still within the limits every one was talking about. There are other posts that talk about this same topic. One member measured the stock drive shaft out of his 86 C10 at 71". Thats a good 10 inches more that what I measured. The only catch is the diameter of the drive shaft and the fact that the 67-72 has limited space due to the center crossmember clearacne where the OE center bearing mounts. I also know there are other members who have one (cant remember who) ..
I am doing a 700r4 conversion and will be going to a one piece then ... I will ask around locally for a drive shaft when I get to that point ...
__________________
Rich
1972 K5 Blazer CST Click HERE

D60 BIG BRAKE UPGRADE Click HERE
mcmlxix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2003, 08:12 PM   #6
ShamrockCustoms
Project56 on hold
 
ShamrockCustoms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Burleson, TX
Posts: 489
mcmlxix:

replace ther center x-member with a driveshaft loop xmember.....clearance problem solved, left over bearing problem solved....
ShamrockCustoms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2003, 03:26 AM   #7
68LSS1
Registered User
 
68LSS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,191
Quote:
Originally posted by ShamrockCustoms
mcmlxix:

replace ther center x-member with a driveshaft loop xmember.....clearance problem solved, left over bearing problem solved....
He's got a trailing arm suspension. That is also where the forward arm bracket is mounted to. Please explain.
__________________
'68 Short Step
LS1/T56, Hydratech, Fatman Fabrications Stage III, Baer, Hot Rods to Hell, US Body, S&W, etc
68LSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2003, 01:57 PM   #8
mcmlxix
Collector of Projects
 
mcmlxix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,106
I got a quote of 295.95 for a one piece drive shaft from Denny's Driveshafts ....
__________________
Rich
1972 K5 Blazer CST Click HERE

D60 BIG BRAKE UPGRADE Click HERE
mcmlxix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2003, 03:07 PM   #9
rodnok1
Registered User
 
rodnok1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Linden, North Carolina
Posts: 617
take a sawzall to the carrier bearing brackets and put a one piece in, I run denny's shaft and no clearance problems(have trailing arms). if you don't cut the brackets off it will rub when you load the truck down heavy and hit a bump(trust me not a fun noise to hear)
__________________
64 Panel Rebuild Pics
Clutch Replacement and Borg Warner T10 Trans Rebuild

64 Panel 1/2 Ton
350cubes/400hp
BorgWarner t-10
3:73 Auburn Posi
rodnok1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2003, 06:53 PM   #10
ShamrockCustoms
Project56 on hold
 
ShamrockCustoms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Burleson, TX
Posts: 489
68LSS1: sure, no prob. the new loop x-member will also be the mounting point for the trailing arms. thing is, you can't use just any x-member. it need to be full size to support the trailing arms. the center section of the new x-member will be a loop instead of straight. this will allow extra clearance for the new driveshaft. the loop should be a good 1" OD tube with at least 1/8" thick wall, preferably 3/16" thick. hope this helps!
__________________
Shamrock Customs
Forever-in-the-Future Custom Shop


2009 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS daily driver
1956 Chevy Stepside rodstoration on winter hold
ShamrockCustoms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 12:14 AM   #11
68LSS1
Registered User
 
68LSS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,191
I just don't think I'd trust that for the hp/torque I hope to be seeing. I may end up having to do something like that though.
__________________
'68 Short Step
LS1/T56, Hydratech, Fatman Fabrications Stage III, Baer, Hot Rods to Hell, US Body, S&W, etc
68LSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 01:50 PM   #12
Slammed67
Progress = 0%
 
Slammed67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 2,108
I have a 1-piece shaft in my '67 short bed. I have a 350/700R4 (in the 6-cyl position), with air bags/c-notch and I have no clearance problems.

My truck was originally a long bed with a 1-piece drive shaft (yes, that is how it came from the factory). I had that shaft cut down and balanced for about $60. So if you can find a 1-piece shaft that is longer than what you need, you can have it shortened for less $$$$ than it would cost to have one made from scratch.
__________________
Jason - '67 GMC swb | '57 Bel-Air 4dr hardtop | '56 210 4dr Wagon | 2000 GMC Sierra
Slammed67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 02:02 PM   #13
68LSS1
Registered User
 
68LSS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,191
I'll need the 700hp warranty that Inland puts on their ds along with the 1350 u joints.
__________________
'68 Short Step
LS1/T56, Hydratech, Fatman Fabrications Stage III, Baer, Hot Rods to Hell, US Body, S&W, etc
68LSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2003, 12:03 AM   #14
ShamrockCustoms
Project56 on hold
 
ShamrockCustoms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Burleson, TX
Posts: 489
this is pretty much what i am talking about. granted, this is a 4link setup, but i think you get the idea......
Attached Images
 
ShamrockCustoms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2003, 03:51 PM   #15
terrym1
Registered User
 
terrym1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: nova scotia
Posts: 179
I have a long wheel base 68 step when I went to the t-5 five speed I went to the salvage yard and bought a shaft from a 86 long wheel base half ton (had the old coupler taken off the rear and welded it to the new shaft by a pro shop). The reason why I used a 86 shaft is they are larger in diameter (less whip) ie. better for larger amounts of HP. I did not half to cut the cross because the truck is lowered, all I had to worry about is the pitch of the rear diff. I am sure if you are going to a one peice shaft, and doing every thing for the short wheel base the same it should work
hope this helps
terrym1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2003, 11:18 AM   #16
MOTHERTRUCKERS
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: BRADENTON FLA
Posts: 3,269
Shamrockcustoms any reason for the 45 degree panhard bars over a 90 degree setup? We have been playing with a Watts linkage panhead bar setup with an offset center point on the upper and lower bars.
__________________
Rest in Peace Ed. Thanks for all the good times.
MOTHERTRUCKERS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2003, 09:29 PM   #17
ShamrockCustoms
Project56 on hold
 
ShamrockCustoms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Burleson, TX
Posts: 489
mothertruckers: well, the photo is just one from a show site. what i can tell you is that the diagonal link is best suited for racing applications because the link does not allow for cornering very well. the end links usually will wear out pretty quick. the panahrd bar is much better for the street. ( i was mainly illustrating the front crossmember setup. )

ShamrockCustoms is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com