Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
02-22-2020, 08:13 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carmichael, California
Posts: 3,005
|
73-87 5.3 exhaust manifold question
Tried a search but couldnt find what I was looking for. I have a 79 C10 and planning a 5.3 swap from a 03-up truck. These years dont have the EGR so Im wondering if there are any frame clearance issues. I live in California and to be a legal swap I have to use the manifolds from the donor truck. Just trying to do my homework.
__________________
Anthony |
02-23-2020, 10:35 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: North-central Virginia
Posts: 1,104
|
Re: 73-87 5.3 exhaust manifold question
Everything I've seen says that the frame can be notched a little to clear the factory manifolds. I'm sure it depends on the engine mounts, and the resulting engine position.
That said, I'd just swap with 2006 trailblazer or 2010 camaro manifolds. As long as they are still equipped with the heat shields, they look very close to stock. The only way someone will know they were changed, would be by checking part numbers. I seriously doubt that happens.
__________________
1987 C6P V20 truck, 2010 LMG 5.3, AFM delete, 2010 Camaro exhaust manifolds, 1997 nv4500, 1991 np241c, hydroboost, 2005 14bff axle & driveshaft, drop-n-lock gooseneck, 4.10 gears, stock suspension, rims, and tires. Still a work in progress. Any questions or suggestions are welcome! |
02-24-2020, 01:34 AM | #3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carmichael, California
Posts: 3,005
|
Re: 73-87 5.3 exhaust manifold question
Quote:
__________________
Anthony |
|
02-24-2020, 02:41 AM | #4 | |
Post Whore
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 10,868
|
Re: 73-87 5.3 exhaust manifold question
Quote:
It has nothing to do with the EGR as that port is in front of the manifold and the interference is in the rear at the three bolt flange. Both EGR and non EGR are the same castings pretty much otherwise. If you had a 1975 or older truck, these Hooker 2.5" exhaust manifolds work great: |
|
02-24-2020, 01:57 AM | #5 |
GM Addicted
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Visalia, Ca
Posts: 2,294
|
Re: 73-87 5.3 exhaust manifold question
Get headers that are C.A.R.B legal for the donor vehicle. Should work when you get it state refed
__________________
..Mac’s Garage.. 73 GMC, 54 Caddy, 2010 Silverado, 68 C10 RIP DAd My 73 GMC Truck Build Pic 2010 Silverado 4/6 on 24s IG:MacsGarage |
02-24-2020, 02:36 AM | #6 |
Post Whore
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 10,868
|
Re: 73-87 5.3 exhaust manifold question
|
02-24-2020, 02:35 AM | #7 |
Post Whore
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 10,868
|
Re: 73-87 5.3 exhaust manifold question
Not to be a bearer of bad news, but I am in Nor Cal and you will not pass SMOG. Also on my '74 the driver side stock manifold cleared fine, on the passenger side the triangle flange hits the frame. I do NOT recommend notching the frame.
You need to drop $10K on a GM E-rod engine to pass SMOG in California if you own a 1976 or newer truck. https://www.gmperformancemotor.com/category/ERODE.html also check out this video, this guy tried to do what you are about to MG #59 - How hard is it to pass smog with an LS swap? hope this helps, not being rude, just keeping it real, maybe saving you some headache |
02-24-2020, 07:17 AM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: North-central Virginia
Posts: 1,104
|
Re: 73-87 5.3 exhaust manifold question
Yeah, I'm REALLY glad I don't live in California.
Another possible but probably ill-advised route -- build the modern engine to look as "stock" as possible. There's cast manifolds designed to put a carburetor on top of a LS engine. I've seen folks bolting a drive-by-wire throttle body and MAF sensor on top of those manifolds, and covering the whole thing with a round air cleaner. I also saw one build that clustered all eight ignition coils into a plausible "distributor", that at first glance, looked like the real deal. He had it mounted in the back of the valley pan, just like the old smallblocks. There's adapters to mount smallblock valve covers onto the LS heads. If really carefully done, the engine would be virtually indistinguishable from a stock small block. Add a dash of grease and grime, and the inspectors are likely to just whiff the exhaust, and send it on. Again, I don't advise this, because I don't know California at all. But I would love to see the result. I've dreamed of an LSx engine that fools 90% of the car buffs into thinking that it's stock.
__________________
1987 C6P V20 truck, 2010 LMG 5.3, AFM delete, 2010 Camaro exhaust manifolds, 1997 nv4500, 1991 np241c, hydroboost, 2005 14bff axle & driveshaft, drop-n-lock gooseneck, 4.10 gears, stock suspension, rims, and tires. Still a work in progress. Any questions or suggestions are welcome! |
02-24-2020, 09:06 AM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carmichael, California
Posts: 3,005
|
Re: 73-87 5.3 exhaust manifold question
I know it can be done because we have members here who have done it. And I see other trucks with them swapped as well and none are using the Erod. Im planning to talk to the referee before I do the swap. Im going to buy a complete running truck for the swap so I`ll have everything from the original truck to transfer over as needed.
__________________
Anthony |
02-24-2020, 10:14 AM | #10 | |
Post Whore
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 10,868
|
Re: 73-87 5.3 exhaust manifold question
Quote:
|
|
02-25-2020, 12:30 AM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carmichael, California
Posts: 3,005
|
Re: 73-87 5.3 exhaust manifold question
One guy posted about his son's 90 k5 that just passed and everything they had to do and another guy I actually knew from here with a 1979 like mine out of Orangevale. Unfortunately he passed away a few years ago so I cant pick his brain. It can be done, and done legally. Yes there are more challenges on the 1976-up but I feel like having the complete running truck to pull part sc from will make it easier
__________________
Anthony |
02-25-2020, 11:17 AM | #12 |
Post Whore
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 10,868
|
Re: 73-87 5.3 exhaust manifold question
|
02-25-2020, 10:29 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carmichael, California
Posts: 3,005
|
Re: 73-87 5.3 exhaust manifold question
__________________
Anthony |
02-25-2020, 12:53 AM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 429
|
Re: 73-87 5.3 exhaust manifold question
Can you grind down that flange a bit? I did with mine exact same spot but they were tbss manifolds and I don’t think it needed much finessing.
|
02-25-2020, 12:45 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 429
|
Re: 73-87 5.3 exhaust manifold question
Wouldn’t a swapped vehicle be more efficient and also less of a carbon footprint for these older trucks? Why would there be so many debilitating restrictions on a swap?
|
02-25-2020, 05:44 PM | #16 |
Post Whore
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 10,868
|
Re: 73-87 5.3 exhaust manifold question
Car companies need to sell cars. One could argue that my '54 is better for the environment than the 6 10 year old trucks that came since (think environmental impacts of manufacturing them, air pollution of making more steel and plastic, shipping the parts across the oceans, and then disposing of the old 5 trucks to always stay current / modern)
|
Bookmarks |
|
|