The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-21-2021, 08:49 AM   #1
Paul Y
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Essex
Posts: 950
Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

More questions means that I really am powering on with Woodys build!

I need to replace the body mounts as the originals, whilst intact, are quite soft and compresses.

Question is, go for the OEM replacements or Energy Suspension hyper flex all singing and dancing red ones?

Is there a noticeable difference in NVH using the 'harder' bushes over the standard rubber?

Is body alignment easier/harder with the 'harder bushes?

Not so worried about cost - the difference is negligible in reality - just don't want to regret either choice if you have advice to give.

Thanks,

P.
__________________
Woody's Build -

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=658621

If it goes wrong, I blame the Internet...
Paul Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2021, 10:38 AM   #2
SkinnyG
Registered User
 
SkinnyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Beautiful BC, Canada, eh?!
Posts: 2,267
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

I'm on the fence with these on my '61.

I -did- do ES poly cab mounts on my '77 C10, and it was a noticeable increase in NVH, which most of the time is subtly annoying to me, and I'm seriously considering going back to rubber.

I bought poly for the '61, but we're a long way from the road yet.
__________________
1961 Apache: "Grabber Orange" Shortboxed, pancake, step-notch, air-ride, turbo, LS
1977 Silverado: Shortboxed & dropped, potato-potato
V8 Pontiac Firefly (Chevy Sprint): The ultimate engine swap: 5.7L in a 1.0L bag
Lotus Super 7 Replica: Scratch-built street-legal rollerskate
SkinnyG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2021, 06:33 PM   #3
vin63
It's Better With Nitro
 
vin63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chino Hills, CA
Posts: 2,262
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

I'm not a fan of polyurethane body mounts. On all of the truck builds that I've been a part of, including my own, I've used rubber mounts. I need to replace the mounts for my 64 Riviera and just purchased rubber mounts, as well.
__________________
1963 C-10: Deluxe-optioned cab, shortbed, fleetside
Pontiac 462 ci, Kauffman D-Port alum. heads
4L80E, narrowed sheetmetal Ford 9-inch
Tubular front and rear suspension
Custom 6-piston front disc and 4-piston rear disc brakes
vin63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2021, 11:46 PM   #4
AcampoDave
Registered User
 
AcampoDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,778
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

I tried poly cab cushions. NVH was pretty bad. Even the change in my ashtray vibrated from my exhaust. Took 'em out and went back to rubber. The difference was noticeable. I did a bit of research and the gist of it was; use poly for rotational things like a swaybar, panhard bar and anywhere cushioning isn't a factor. But for a smoother ride stick with rubber on A-arms, and body mounts. I did use poly in my trailing arms since they fall into the more rotational than cushioning catagory which seems to work out fine. Black poly is graphite impregnated to help reduce squeaks. Red is for a standout look and is not.
AcampoDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2021, 02:21 AM   #5
Paul Y
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Essex
Posts: 950
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

Gentlemen,

Thank you for the feedback, I have on,y ever used rubber body mounts on my builds but Poly came up as an option when I was searching Rock Auto (funny enough couldn’t find rubber mounts) hence the original question.

Dave,

I am on the fence about using poly bushes in the trailing arms as have read that they cause the arms to bind as they don’t allow any ‘twist’. Any thoughts or feedback on this as a real world user rather than a hypothesis?

P.
__________________
Woody's Build -

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=658621

If it goes wrong, I blame the Internet...
Paul Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2021, 03:56 AM   #6
Paul Y
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Essex
Posts: 950
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

Good to know Skinny - feel that if I am going to the expense and bother of dyna matting my cab that using hard business with the inherent NVH is a bit counter intuitive....

Mind you, as I am also planning to run boom tubes this all might be a bit of a moot point....

P.
__________________
Woody's Build -

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=658621

If it goes wrong, I blame the Internet...
Paul Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2021, 04:26 AM   #7
franken
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,124
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

I just used aluminum mounts on the Camaro. I don't think it's a big issue.
That said, if one buys Asian rubber mounts, expect them to fail in short order if exposed to sunlight. Asian rubber is less good than the rubber on your car now.
franken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2021, 10:14 AM   #8
SkinnyG
Registered User
 
SkinnyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Beautiful BC, Canada, eh?!
Posts: 2,267
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

Poly doesn't want to move in two different directions. In a front control arm, the forward and rearward pivots are in line with each other, so poly works fine there.

In the trailing arms, the left and right arm pivots are NOT in line with each other, so they -will- introduce bind, but whether, at such a long length, and such a subtle angle difference, and such a limited amount of rotation, it is enough misalignment to cause a problem remains to be seen.

I did buy poly trailing arm bushings for me '61, fully knowing this. I'll try it.

I fabricated a new panhard with poly ends, and it was binding problem for sure - I switched to rod ends.

My '61 has full poly front suspension and full poly motor mounts too. It has not been driven yet, so I might hate it still.

My '77 C10 daily has full poly front and rear suspension, poly cab mounts, poly sway bar bits, and fully poly motor mounts. The truck also has 1-ton coils and Big 10 leafs. The cab mounts made the worst change to NVH.
__________________
1961 Apache: "Grabber Orange" Shortboxed, pancake, step-notch, air-ride, turbo, LS
1977 Silverado: Shortboxed & dropped, potato-potato
V8 Pontiac Firefly (Chevy Sprint): The ultimate engine swap: 5.7L in a 1.0L bag
Lotus Super 7 Replica: Scratch-built street-legal rollerskate

Last edited by SkinnyG; 04-22-2021 at 11:37 PM.
SkinnyG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2021, 01:13 PM   #9
Paul Y
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Essex
Posts: 950
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyG View Post
Poly doesn't want to move in two different directions. In a front control arm, the forward and rearward pivots are in line with each other, so poly works fine there.

In the trailing arms, the left and right arm pivots are in line with each other, so they -will- introduce bind, but whether, at such a long length, and such a subtle angle difference, and such a limited amount of rotation, it is enough misalignment to cause a problem remains to be seen.

I did buy poly trailing arm bushings for me '61, fully knowing this. I'll try it.

I fabricated a new panhard with poly ends, and it was binding problem for sure - I switched to rod ends.

My '61 has full poly front suspension and full poly motor mounts too. It has not been driven yet, so I might hate it still.

My '77 C10 daily has full poly front and rear suspension, poly cab mounts, poly sway bar bits, and fully poly motor mounts. The truck also has 1-ton coils and Big 10 leafs. The cab mounts made the worst change to NVH.
Skinny thanks for the analysis.

In my younger days I ran a fully rose jointed 911 street/track car and revelled in the lack of compliance and directness of the chassis. Now I think would want to shoot myself.....

Tried Rock Auto for the cab bushings but they only stock the Poly versions - any body got a recommendation for who to buy from?

P.
__________________
Woody's Build -

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=658621

If it goes wrong, I blame the Internet...
Paul Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2021, 11:39 PM   #10
SkinnyG
Registered User
 
SkinnyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Beautiful BC, Canada, eh?!
Posts: 2,267
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Y View Post
Skinny thanks for the analysis.
No problem. Though I did edit my post to say the trailing arm pivots are NOT inline with each other (which is why they will bind).

I've been seriously considering changing my '77 back to rubber cab mounts. Nobody seems to have them in stock, if they list them at all.

I did have to weld metal into the cab frame mounts on the '61 as one (only one) had rotted through completely. My '77 was solid.
__________________
1961 Apache: "Grabber Orange" Shortboxed, pancake, step-notch, air-ride, turbo, LS
1977 Silverado: Shortboxed & dropped, potato-potato
V8 Pontiac Firefly (Chevy Sprint): The ultimate engine swap: 5.7L in a 1.0L bag
Lotus Super 7 Replica: Scratch-built street-legal rollerskate
SkinnyG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2021, 09:38 AM   #11
Paul Y
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Essex
Posts: 950
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyG View Post
No problem. Though I did edit my post to say the trailing arm pivots are NOT inline with each other (which is why they will bind).

I've been seriously considering changing my '77 back to rubber cab mounts. Nobody seems to have them in stock, if they list them at all.

I did have to weld metal into the cab frame mounts on the '61 as one (only one) had rotted through completely. My '77 was solid.
Saw the edit.

Its a difficult one to decide which route to go as there is conflicting advice across the internet and, without being able to do a like for like/back to back comparison, I am not sure there is a right or wrong answer.

As most of us building trucks take several years from taking them off the road to re emerging, like a beautiful butterfly from a chrysalis, the previous 'feel' of the truck - pre mods- is a distant memory so this makes it even harder....

The decision on which route to go could actually have been made for me as there are no rubber mounts available anywhere... Good job my brother in law is a dentist....

P.
__________________
Woody's Build -

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=658621

If it goes wrong, I blame the Internet...
Paul Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2021, 12:10 PM   #12
66x3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Bellevue, MI
Posts: 118
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

Am I the only one who has experienced this? I went to replace front cab mounts on my 66 C 20 ( with rubber) and found the top of the frame mounts rusted pretty much through. The older gent who bought this truck in 73 said " It never spent a night outside" and the truck was zeibarted at some point. I'm thinking the nights sitting inside caused this? Long story short what started as a pretty simple job got a lot more complicated.
66x3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2021, 01:16 PM   #13
Paul Y
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Essex
Posts: 950
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 66x3 View Post
Am I the only one who has experienced this? I went to replace front cab mounts on my 66 C 20 ( with rubber) and found the top of the frame mounts rusted pretty much through. The older gent who bought this truck in 73 said " It never spent a night outside" and the truck was zeibarted at some point. I'm thinking the nights sitting inside caused this? Long story short what started as a pretty simple job got a lot more complicated.
That is weird.

Have you managed to repair the damage without resorting to taking the body off?

P.
__________________
Woody's Build -

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=658621

If it goes wrong, I blame the Internet...
Paul Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2021, 01:27 PM   #14
vin63
It's Better With Nitro
 
vin63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chino Hills, CA
Posts: 2,262
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

Humidity is really pervasive. Having spent a lot of time working in Michigan, I can certainly understand the corrosion. I usually put a thin film of lithium grease on the mating surfaces of the bushings to help slow the moisture from making its way between the rubber bushing and mount.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 66x3 View Post
Am I the only one who has experienced this? I went to replace front cab mounts on my 66 C 20 ( with rubber) and found the top of the frame mounts rusted pretty much through. The older gent who bought this truck in 73 said " It never spent a night outside" and the truck was zeibarted at some point. I'm thinking the nights sitting inside caused this? Long story short what started as a pretty simple job got a lot more complicated.
__________________
1963 C-10: Deluxe-optioned cab, shortbed, fleetside
Pontiac 462 ci, Kauffman D-Port alum. heads
4L80E, narrowed sheetmetal Ford 9-inch
Tubular front and rear suspension
Custom 6-piston front disc and 4-piston rear disc brakes
vin63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2021, 07:42 PM   #15
66x3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Bellevue, MI
Posts: 118
Question Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

I'm in the process of welding new metal on the underside of the mounts, ground out the circular rusted areas and have a big washer recessed into that area and one of the square shims on top of that. The original mounts had one shim when disassembled so thinking it should sit about right. The rear (underbed) portion of the frame is a little crusty so pretty sure thats what caused the rusted mounts. The old truck is still in better shape than most michigan vehicles that age. Guess i'll see if my welds hold up !
66x3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2021, 12:11 PM   #16
66x3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Bellevue, MI
Posts: 118
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

( From sitting on a damp cement floor)
66x3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2021, 09:54 AM   #17
AcampoDave
Registered User
 
AcampoDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,778
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

These are what I have now. I kept the polys though, just in case... https://www.classicparts.com/1963-66...4aAtBMEALw_wcB
AcampoDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2021, 10:06 AM   #18
Paul Y
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Essex
Posts: 950
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

Thanks Dave,

They are actually in stock as well! Did you change the radiator support business at the same time?

P.
__________________
Woody's Build -

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=658621

If it goes wrong, I blame the Internet...
Paul Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2021, 10:08 PM   #19
AcampoDave
Registered User
 
AcampoDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,778
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Y View Post
Thanks Dave,

They are actually in stock as well! Did you change the radiator support business at the same time?

P.
No, but I probably should. Theyre likely shot
AcampoDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2021, 03:01 PM   #20
M37-454
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

Another vote for rubber cab mounts. I went with poly at first and the "tin can" resonance on longer drives bugged me enough to try a rubber set. I'm convinced it's quieter in the cab now and am sticking with rubber from here on out.

I can't speak to body alignment though, I didn't fuss with it since nothing is straight on my truck anyway. "Well used" is the nicest way to put it.
M37-454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2021, 12:10 PM   #21
cwcarpenter98
Senior Member


 
cwcarpenter98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Hickory Flat, GA
Posts: 4,491
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

Go ahead and get the radiator support mount stuff. Not all that expensive and it'll all fit in one box to save a little on shipping
__________________
Christian Carpenter

1963 C10 - Frankentruck 283, Muncie 3 speed with overdrive
Overdrive wiring here
1963-ish truck bed trailer - Half-Wit

1981 C10 - Penny 305, th350 --> Soon to be 350, Saginaw 4 speed

1995 Dodge Dakota Sport

"I'll put it simple: if you're going hard enough left, you'll find yourself turning right." - Doc Hudson
cwcarpenter98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2021, 11:41 AM   #22
dweikum
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Body Mounts. Energy Suspension or standard?

Lots of good info here! Body mounts are on the list. Rebuilding my front-end now, noticed that RockAuto only has the poly bushings for the front...I know from having poly bushings on the front of my Tacoma that they squeak (a lot) so looking for rubber there. Didn't consider the extra harshness of the body mounts but I will now.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com