Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-24-2005, 06:18 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: olympia wa
Posts: 33
|
dropped control arms vs. dropped spindles
just wondering if anyone has modified their stock lower control arms with a step to drop two inches or so. I have a template that I ordered from bill turner ent. a couple years back, with instructions on the modification. I was looking for feedback from someone who might have tried it. I have already done the 1.5 inch crossmember drop with a set of 2 inch drop springs. i'm looking for a little more drop. the plus I see to the control arm mod is that I could use later model discs out of the wrecking yard instead of the 500 dollar disc/spindle kits. anyone have any experience with this? thanks,1969Burb
|
08-24-2005, 08:14 PM | #2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
|
Quote:
For my own personal ride? Drop spindles w/o a doubt. I just like the better engineering they offer. Both will work though. So, if you can fab . . ......
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
08-24-2005, 10:32 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: olympia wa
Posts: 33
|
thanks for replying, scoti. I probably didn't explain my scenario all that well. I just figure if I spring for the spindles it will be with the discs at the same time. If I go the control arm route that would let me use a standard spindle and I would go the low buck route using 71 to 87 pieces off of a donor. It all comes down to $$. my concern about the control arms are ride quality and any ill handling characteristics. I'm leaning towards the spindles, its just the cheap guy in me wanting to check out all the possibilities. thanks again!
|
08-24-2005, 11:23 PM | #4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
|
Quote:
Just because you spend less initially does not always make it cheaper to do.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
08-25-2005, 12:41 AM | #5 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Yoncalla Oregon
Posts: 775
|
Quote:
Amen, Wiser words are seldom spoken!!! I have learned that lesson time and again. |
|
08-25-2005, 11:30 AM | #6 |
Epoxy Primer Friendly
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South of Houston TEXXXAS
Posts: 680
|
I went with a static 7" front 8" rear drop to be real low and now I went to bags in the driveway. So I take that phrase to heart. This board helped a lot!
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|