The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-02-2009, 03:11 PM   #51
daverod
SSN 706
 
daverod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pocatello Idaho
Posts: 3,821
Re: Bagged, how low will it go with standard cnotch. Any pics???

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkullCandy View Post
Will the 60-66 truck lay the frame on stock suspension? with a big c-notch.
You have to do a lot of stuff and stuff if you want to lay frame. But don't let that stop you . Everything you ever wanted to know is here. I'll you have to do is search and read and look at pictures and then spend $$. I guess it depends on what you consider stock means. Born in Vernon.BC

Last edited by daverod; 07-02-2009 at 05:18 PM.
daverod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 03:36 PM   #52
protrash64
Resistance is Futile
 
protrash64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mesa,Arizona
Posts: 3,520
Re: Bagged, how low will it go with standard cnotch. Any pics???

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkullCandy View Post
Will the 60-66 truck lay the frame on stock suspension? with a big c-notch.
If you call your a-arm crossshafts frame, then yes. Depends on tire size , too.
__________________
64 CHEVY PICK-UP > http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...otrash+re-hash
64 CARRYALL >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1964+suburban
66 LB >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=427852
STRENGTH/DETERMINATION/MERCILESS/FOREVER
.......posted via stationary device
protrash64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 05:23 PM   #53
chevytrucknut
Registered User
 
chevytrucknut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Battleground, Washington
Posts: 177
Re: Bagged, how low will it go with standard cnotch. Any pics???

here's another pic or two.
Attached Images
   
__________________
'77 GMC SWB
'66 SNB (Project)
Battle Ground, WA

Last edited by chevytrucknut; 07-02-2009 at 05:27 PM.
chevytrucknut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 07:31 PM   #54
Frizzle Fry
Registered User
 
Frizzle Fry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hillsboro Oregon
Posts: 6,449
Re: Bagged, how low will it go with standard cnotch. Any pics???

Hey, where did you get the trim that connects the two sails and runs under the back window? GMC?
Frizzle Fry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 08:16 PM   #55
ruffrida2005
Member of the longbed union.
 
ruffrida2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Killeen, Tx
Posts: 2,158
Re: Bagged, how low will it go with standard cnotch. Any pics???

skullcandy you can use your stock supsension parts. But and I mean a Big But. You will not be able to lay frame in the front because the crossmember and LCA lays under the frame. You can either section your crossmember or Z the frame to get what you need to lay out. For the back You will have to build a really wide notch at the bottom, because the trailing arms this the frame before it ever lays out. Ways around this Z the back of the frame as well to raise the bed section higher then under the cab. You can build a back half using 2x3 should give you the clearance so it doesn't hit. The problem that most people have when using the stock trailing arms is that your going to have to spend the money to box the arms or it will twist on you since you have to offset the bag. I was planing on doing the same thing, but after really looking at how much trouble it would be to just to get the stock parts to lay out you can build a 2,3,or 4 link for the same price. If you want to know what I'm talking about look at a bunch of the threads, and theres a thread that supports what I'm talking about I'll try to find it for ya!
__________________
Paul

88 GMC Crew Cab dually, 454/T400

64 LWB 400 HP 350/350T Bagged, under construction! Sold most of it!

92 S10 Iron Duke 5 speed, 5/7 drop for now. soon to be bagged. Sold http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...59#post4637759
ruffrida2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 08:22 PM   #56
daverod
SSN 706
 
daverod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pocatello Idaho
Posts: 3,821
Re: Bagged, how low will it go with standard cnotch. Any pics???

Some good info. Thank Ruff
daverod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 08:46 PM   #57
chevytrucknut
Registered User
 
chevytrucknut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Battleground, Washington
Posts: 177
Re: Bagged, how low will it go with standard cnotch. Any pics???

The black '63 suburban and the black '65 are both bagged and have a small notch. The orange truck from a few pics back is the same frame set up but the body has been dropped 6 inches around the frame. The sheetmetal touches before the frame does. Its a lot of work and you loose some leg room but you get a really good ride out of it.
Attached Images
 
__________________
'77 GMC SWB
'66 SNB (Project)
Battle Ground, WA

Last edited by chevytrucknut; 07-02-2009 at 08:49 PM.
chevytrucknut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 09:30 PM   #58
Ben IV
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Glenpool OK
Posts: 255
Re: Bagged, how low will it go with standard cnotch. Any pics???

Not what your lookin for exactly but its one good lookin short step.

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...4&postcount=12
__________________
70 GMC custom short bed conversion
69 GMC panel truck
Ben IV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 10:02 PM   #59
bird7263
Urban Chop Shop
 
bird7263's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tigard Oregon
Posts: 264
Re: Bagged, how low will it go with standard cnotch. Any pics???

Ben- Yeah, I love that truck.. stance is sweet.. Some day I will build another one... Because you can own more than one 60-66 right.. lol.

Jack- Talked to Jake today.. Going in next week.. We are gonna bag the rear and do new spindles and springs up front.. I dont really care about the front being low as much as I do the back..

I take it those are pics from Billit Proof? Looking good.. Wish I could have made it..The Baby is taking up all my time.
__________________
2003 Chevy Trailblazer LTZ, 2.5" Susp Lift, Tinted, HID's/LED interior/ Lot of upgrades and little mods

1965 Chevy 1/2T Longbox, soon to be a slammed shop truck

Build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=591266

Semper Fi Marines
bird7263 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 12:01 AM   #60
protrash64
Resistance is Futile
 
protrash64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mesa,Arizona
Posts: 3,520
Re: Bagged, how low will it go with standard cnotch. Any pics???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frizzle Fry View Post
Hey, where did you get the trim that connects the two sails and runs under the back window? GMC?
Come on Frizzle, you oughta be able to hammer out that piece with one arm tied behind your back......
__________________
64 CHEVY PICK-UP > http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...otrash+re-hash
64 CARRYALL >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1964+suburban
66 LB >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=427852
STRENGTH/DETERMINATION/MERCILESS/FOREVER
.......posted via stationary device
protrash64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 01:17 AM   #61
Frizzle Fry
Registered User
 
Frizzle Fry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hillsboro Oregon
Posts: 6,449
Re: Bagged, how low will it go with standard cnotch. Any pics???

Hah, don't mean to hijack. I've just never seen that on a Chevy. I like it.
Frizzle Fry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 09:50 AM   #62
SkullCandy
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 81
Re: Bagged, how low will it go with standard cnotch. Any pics???

Quote:
Originally Posted by daverod View Post
You have to do a lot of stuff and stuff if you want to lay frame. But don't let that stop you . Everything you ever wanted to know is here. I'll you have to do is search and read and look at pictures and then spend $$. I guess it depends on what you consider stock means. Born in Vernon.BC
Quote:
Originally Posted by protrash64 View Post
If you call your a-arm crossshafts frame, then yes. Depends on tire size , too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ruffrida2005 View Post
skullcandy you can use your stock supsension parts. But and I mean a Big But. You will not be able to lay frame in the front because the crossmember and LCA lays under the frame. You can either section your crossmember or Z the frame to get what you need to lay out. For the back You will have to build a really wide notch at the bottom, because the trailing arms this the frame before it ever lays out. Ways around this Z the back of the frame as well to raise the bed section higher then under the cab. You can build a back half using 2x3 should give you the clearance so it doesn't hit. The problem that most people have when using the stock trailing arms is that your going to have to spend the money to box the arms or it will twist on you since you have to offset the bag. I was planing on doing the same thing, but after really looking at how much trouble it would be to just to get the stock parts to lay out you can build a 2,3,or 4 link for the same price. If you want to know what I'm talking about look at a bunch of the threads, and theres a thread that supports what I'm talking about I'll try to find it for ya!

Oh yeah.. Thanks for the info
__________________
1990 Dodge Ram D250 Cummins
SkullCandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com