The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-10-2010, 12:41 PM   #1
Northern lights
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Whitemud Alberta
Posts: 328
348/409

Anybody put a w-head in a 64-66 pickup?. I'm wondering if it will fit without modifying the firewall. It LOOKS like the engine might be too wide for the valve covers to clear. Thoughts?
Northern lights is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 01:05 PM   #2
Rogue
Airport Bum
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Propwash (16Xray) D/FW, Texas
Posts: 320
Re: 348/409

No, but i'd give my wisdom teeth for a 340 horse 409 with a 348 tripower in my '64.

maybe one day.

I'd sure like to see pics if someone has done it.
__________________
1964 Chevrolet C-10
1941 Chevrolet coupe
1962 Thunderbird
1959 Edsel Villager
1963 Skylark
Rogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 01:36 PM   #3
padresag
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sidney,b.c.
Posts: 4,425
Re: 348/409

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern lights View Post
Anybody put a w-head in a 64-66 pickup?. I'm wondering if it will fit without modifying the firewall. It LOOKS like the engine might be too wide for the valve covers to clear. Thoughts?
should fit as the 348-409 were used in the larger medium duty trucks I believe. same cab
ron

Last edited by padresag; 02-10-2010 at 01:37 PM.
padresag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 03:02 PM   #4
Northern lights
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Whitemud Alberta
Posts: 328
Re: 348/409

Quote:
Originally Posted by padresag View Post
should fit as the 348-409 were used in the larger medium duty trucks I believe. same cab
ron
That's a good point. However, i think the cabs on the bigger trucks are mounted higher off the frame which would put the valve covers down where the tunnel is wider but I'm not certain. How about a big block with tall valve covers??? if that fits, the W-head big block should.......I think.
Northern lights is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 03:33 PM   #5
blackedoutharley
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Plumas Lake, Ca.
Posts: 1,009
Re: 348/409

I was wondering the same thing last night as I have a complete & fresh '64 409 in my garage.
blackedoutharley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 07:18 PM   #6
protrash64
Resistance is Futile
 
protrash64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mesa,Arizona
Posts: 3,520
Re: 348/409

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern lights View Post
That's a good point. However, i think the cabs on the bigger trucks are mounted higher off the frame which would put the valve covers down where the tunnel is wider but I'm not certain. How about a big block with tall valve covers??? if that fits, the W-head big block should.......I think.
Ive read a few threads that mention trouble with big valve covers on BBC interfering with the firewall. I think it depends on your mount stand type and the positioning with in the engine compartment. Not sure about the 348/409's....but they sure look cool to me!!
__________________
64 CHEVY PICK-UP > http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...otrash+re-hash
64 CARRYALL >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1964+suburban
66 LB >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=427852
STRENGTH/DETERMINATION/MERCILESS/FOREVER
.......posted via stationary device
protrash64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 08:00 PM   #7
padresag
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sidney,b.c.
Posts: 4,425
Re: 348/409

66 models used the 366 eng which is a BB. Looking at a pic of a floor on a lager model the floois pretty well devoid of a hump, which goes with the raised body mounts, stating that the body is raised. we will just have to wait a see what someone will say upon actually seeing a visual of a c33-50 cab.
but loooking at the raised mounts, they may be good for someone who is giong to do a boyy lift or adapting to a later frame
ron
padresag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 10:48 PM   #8
jonzcustomshop
1961 crewcab
 
jonzcustomshop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: missoula, mt
Posts: 6,164
Re: 348/409

these are the only shots I have. 65 c80:
Attached Images
   
jonzcustomshop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 11:19 PM   #9
Dan in Pasadena
Senior Member

 
Dan in Pasadena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora, CA
Posts: 6,344
Re: 348/409

My Dad put a 348 in his '59 so I don't see why you couldn't make one fit in a 64-66.
Dan in Pasadena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 12:52 AM   #10
LILRED66
Account Suspended
 
LILRED66's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 3,906
Re: 348/409

Quote:
Originally Posted by padresag View Post
66 models used the 366 eng which is a BB. Looking at a pic of a floor on a lager model the floois pretty well devoid of a hump, which goes with the raised body mounts, stating that the body is raised. we will just have to wait a see what someone will say upon actually seeing a visual of a c33-50 cab.
but loooking at the raised mounts, they may be good for someone who is giong to do a boyy lift or adapting to a later frame
ron

The light-duty, series 10, 20 & 30 cabs are all the same. The medium-duty, series 40 & 50 and the heavy-duty, series 60 & 80 have the virtually flat tranny cover.
LILRED66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 02:14 PM   #11
Northern lights
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Whitemud Alberta
Posts: 328
Re: 348/409

I did some measuring today and it looks unlikely that a W-head will fit without firewall mods. The height of the valve covers from the motor mount is the same on the W as the SBC but the W is 4 inches wider at the outside top corner of the valve covers than a SBC. At present there is about 1 inch clearance from the valve cover to the firewall tunnel so, it appears that the fire wall will have to be pushed out >1 inch on each side. Not a major, just means that I will not be doing the swap until next winter. Just as well, I have other things to do anyway. When the time come I will post what was involved (if anything) so anyone else considering such a swap will have a bit of a guide.

Last edited by Northern lights; 02-11-2010 at 02:16 PM.
Northern lights is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 06:10 PM   #12
jonzcustomshop
1961 crewcab
 
jonzcustomshop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: missoula, mt
Posts: 6,164
Re: 348/409

some day i would like a w moter in my 65...
jonzcustomshop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 07:01 PM   #13
BTCHN 1963
Registered User
 
BTCHN 1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: mount angel, oregon
Posts: 42
Re: 348/409

I have a 409 that I am eventually going to put into my 63 suburban. Right now I am rebuilding the front end. When I get the motor mounts in I will set the 409 in and let you know what the clearance looks like.
BTCHN 1963 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2010, 02:29 PM   #14
Northern lights
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Whitemud Alberta
Posts: 328
Re: 348/409

Quote:
Originally Posted by BTCHN 1963 View Post
I have a 409 that I am eventually going to put into my 63 suburban. Right now I am rebuilding the front end. When I get the motor mounts in I will set the 409 in and let you know what the clearance looks like.
Cool, looking forward to it. Thanks.
Northern lights is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com