The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2010, 10:00 PM   #1
62 Bowtie
Registered User
 
62 Bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elk Grove Ca
Posts: 629
Bag Q

Getting ready to bag my truck and was wondering what bags you guys with bagged 60-66 trucks specifically are running. Research is telling me if i want to cruise at low height, and i do, I should use smaller bags in other words 6in dia. versus 7 or 8 so that i will have better ride quality. My understanding is bigger bags at low ride height tend to cause a bouncy ride and possibly ruin my shocks "what say you?"
62 Bowtie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 10:32 PM   #2
sams60gmc
Registered User
 
sams60gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver Washington
Posts: 726
Re: Bag Q

I'm runing Dominator 2600's at all 4 corners they are pretty big bags. I haven't driven it yet tho so I'm not sure about the ride quality.
__________________

1960 GMC short fleet, full frame build...
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=329718
sams60gmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 10:42 PM   #3
GGinferno
DiablosWeldingFabrication
 
GGinferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Elverta ,CA
Posts: 201
Re: Bag Q

If it helps! 2600 Dominators is what i got in the rear!
GGinferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 10:44 PM   #4
GGinferno
DiablosWeldingFabrication
 
GGinferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Elverta ,CA
Posts: 201
Re: Bag Q

hahaha! on the truck!

Last edited by GGinferno; 09-14-2010 at 10:44 PM.
GGinferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 10:49 PM   #5
xratt
Registered User
 
xratt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 131
Re: Bag Q

I'm running 2600's (bigger bags) up front, and 2500's (fairly small) in the rear. My truck is built to lay frame. So I ended up ripping off the front shocks. So I only have rear shocks now. I drive mine everyday, at all heights. The front end is a little bouncy, but not too bad. My C10 also has a V8, so it is a little heavier. If i do run it too low and hit any large bumps or rollers, the lower arms hit of course. I do want to adapt shocks to it one day. But I ended up grinding off the shock mounts from the lower arms by being cool and dragging the front end while driving. Not the best idea.
__________________
1966 C10, SB305, bagged.
1955 VW Buggy, 2.0L
1978 Honda CB550
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...9&goto=newpost
xratt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 10:51 PM   #6
GGinferno
DiablosWeldingFabrication
 
GGinferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Elverta ,CA
Posts: 201
Re: Bag Q

The new dont know yet! i will let you know!

Last edited by GGinferno; 09-14-2010 at 10:52 PM.
GGinferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2010, 10:26 AM   #7
Malibob
Registered User
 
Malibob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 392
Re: Bag Q

I run Dominators 2600 lbs. bags on all 4 corners and love the ride. now for the bad...

If you are not running a dropmember or chopped crossmember you need to REALLY be careful. I was cruisin low in downtown Pittsburgh, lookin cool in my rig as I usually do (LOL). Then from 25 or so mph to 0 in a split second. I hit a steel plate in the road, stopped me dead in my tracks. I am lucky I didnt rip shlt off my truck. I checked it all out and she is a tough rig, but I almost loaded my pants with that one. (glad I got seat belts)

My point is be careful where you cruise low. I only do it at shows and roads I know like the back of my hand now. That being said I can still get lower than a static drop and cruise with NO problems. Just be careful and ready to pick her up when you need to.
__________________
This statement was made possible by a grant from this station and continued support from viewers like you.

Flickr

Last edited by Malibob; 09-15-2010 at 10:27 AM.
Malibob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 10:15 PM   #8
evobuilder
Registered User
 
evobuilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 39
Re: Bag Q

I am running the same bags andd cruise this low through crappy streets in Seattle and have not had any problems.... I have a oretty serious C notch though, so I have a lot of axlee travel. I also have my exhaust running up inside my frame rails.... and if you are going low.... you MUST run your exhaust high. Remember, anything that hangs down WILL get ripped off. Hope that helps!
evobuilder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 12:13 AM   #9
shortbed70
Registered User
 
shortbed70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Forney TX
Posts: 4,512
Re: Bag Q

I have re7's up front and firestone 2500's out back but haven't driven yet but I have no rubbing issues.
__________________
Troy

1965 Chevy Bagged,361 sbc,voodoo cam,1.5 full roller rockers,patriot 185cc vortec heads 2.02-1.60,vortec weiand polished intake,demon carb

my truckhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=332884

Big Red Dog build
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=572274
shortbed70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 09:31 AM   #10
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
Re: Bag Q

7"/2600's/RE-7's up front
6"/2500's/RE-6's in back

The front spec'd bag will work in the rear. However, 'low' cruising heights require minimal air resulting in the 'choppy' ride. The smaller bag seems to better suite the ride height vs. pressure requirement for the best ride quality.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 11:57 AM   #11
Sick5
C10 CLUB Y QUE!
 
Sick5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 2,770
Re: Bag Q

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGinferno View Post
If it helps! 2600 Dominators is what i got in the rear!
lol who installed them!
Sick5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 12:01 PM   #12
Sick5
C10 CLUB Y QUE!
 
Sick5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 2,770
Re: Bag Q

RE7 all aroud
Sick5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 02:26 PM   #13
62 Bowtie
Registered User
 
62 Bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elk Grove Ca
Posts: 629
Re: Bag Q

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
7"/2600's/RE-7's up front
6"/2500's/RE-6's in back

The front spec'd bag will work in the rear. However, 'low' cruising heights require minimal air resulting in the 'choppy' ride. The smaller bag seems to better suite the ride height vs. pressure requirement for the best ride quality.
Thanks looks like I'll be going with this setup also similar to shortbed70's setup thanks to everyone for the help
62 Bowtie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com