The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-10-2011, 09:56 PM   #1
ChrisAunchman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Middleboro, MA
Posts: 55
73-87 control arms?

I am planning on what todo with the front suspension on my 65 Chevy C-10. I have access to a complete front end out of a 1978 C-10. I have a few questions though.
Can I use the the 78 control arms in place of the older control
arms? or Do I need to swap the engine crossmembers?

If I order a set of DJM tubular upper and lower control arms can I
use the '78 spindles for a disc brake options?

Thanks,
Chris
ChrisAunchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2011, 11:28 PM   #2
k1rodeoboater
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Fayetteville NC
Posts: 752
Re: 73-87 control arms?

In order of your questions...

yes

no, but you can if you want to

...don't know
__________________
1966 C10 Long step build on a budget http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=445201

no garage, no shop, limited storage space and tools....no problem.
k1rodeoboater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 12:01 AM   #3
Captainfab
60-66 Nut

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 23,252
Re: 73-87 control arms?

Yes you can bolt the '78 control arms up to your '65 crossmember. However, on the lower control arms, I recommend drilling out the holes in your '65 crossmember so you can use the '78 U-bolts.

About the DJM control arms, I would say that depends on which ones you order. That would be something you need to ask either the dealer you are buying from or DJM directly.
__________________
Power Steering Box Adapter Plates For Sale HERE
Power Brake Booster Adapter Brackets For Sale '63-'66 HERE and '67-'72 HERE and '60-'62 HERE and "60-'62 with clutch HERE
Rear Disc Brake Brackets For Sale. Impala SS calipers HERE Camaro Calipers HERE D52 Calipers HERE 6 Lug HERE
Hydroboost Mounting Plates HERE
Captainfab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 08:52 AM   #4
ChrisAunchman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Middleboro, MA
Posts: 55
Re: 73-87 control arms?

The control arms I'm looking at from DJM cover from 65-70.

Would it be better to order the 73-87 control arms and use my '78 crossmember or reuse the 65 crossmember?

My goal would be to use a spindle that would allow me to easily install disc brakes and upgraded steering. I have been looking at the plates that allow you to install the 73-87 steering boxes.

This is why I'm thinking of reusing the older '78 spindles.
ChrisAunchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 12:49 PM   #5
k1rodeoboater
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Fayetteville NC
Posts: 752
Re: 73-87 control arms?

...is your engine still in the truck? Pulling the crossmemeber with the engine still in makes it a bit tougher. Doable but just a bit more work.
__________________
1966 C10 Long step build on a budget http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=445201

no garage, no shop, limited storage space and tools....no problem.
k1rodeoboater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 01:15 PM   #6
ChrisAunchman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Middleboro, MA
Posts: 55
Re: 73-87 control arms?

The frame is bare. This is pretty much a ground up build. I have alot of options here. Just trying to explore the best option. Especially since I have the whole front end and crossmember of a '78 C-10.

Reason why I'm asking is because I have seen people use a 73-87 crossmember in these trucks. Just not sure if there is an advantage or not. It seems to make more sense though togo after market with the control arms.
ChrisAunchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 01:33 PM   #7
jimmydean
Registered User
 
jimmydean's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 3,728
Re: 73-87 control arms?

It's easier to drill out the u bolts and use the early crossmember than it is to drill out the frame to fit the later crossmember. Either way works, though.
__________________
New Project: 1966 LWB C20
Plans:
1/2 ton conversion
Dropmember front
Dropmember rear
Corvette discs
Restored raised bed

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=4295210
jimmydean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 01:48 PM   #8
scotts62
One day...
 
scotts62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tuttle, Ok
Posts: 9,243
Re: 73-87 control arms?

I just drilled a couple more holes in the frame and used the whole cross member out of a '74, just seemed easier at the time than taking two apart to make one work.
__________________
Scott

93 crew cab build
Project 62
scotts62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 02:25 PM   #9
ChrisAunchman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Middleboro, MA
Posts: 55
Re: 73-87 control arms?

So what do you mean drill out the U-bolts? I'm assuming you are talking about the lower control arm u-bolts.

Drilling them out? Are you talking about opening the holes in the engine crossmember?

Also is there any issue/difference in the coil spring seats between the earlier & newer setup?
ChrisAunchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 04:30 PM   #10
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
Re: 73-87 control arms?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisAunchman View Post
So what do you mean drill out the U-bolts? I'm assuming you are talking about the lower control arm u-bolts.

Drilling them out? Are you talking about opening the holes in the engine crossmember?

Also is there any issue/difference in the coil spring seats between the earlier & newer setup?
The earlier trucks w/drum brakes had a-arm u-bolts that were 1/2". The later model trucks w/disc brakes (post 72) were 9/16". Either u-bolt will retain the newer a-arms but the later ones are technically stronger.

Coil springs will interchange.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 04:34 PM   #11
Chevy Fleetside
Registered User
 
Chevy Fleetside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 4,782
Re: 73-87 control arms?

I used the whole suspension from a 75 chevy truck. All bolted up to my 65 crossmember. I am going to go back and drill the holes for the bigger u bolts as I used the smaller ones from the 65. I used the center link and all. Including the springs.
Attached Images
  
__________________
"A man and his truck, what a beautiful thing"

65 Short Fleetside BBC
65 Long Fleetside 283 3 on the tree for now.
my build thread http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...d.php?t=259536
Chevy Fleetside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 05:43 PM   #12
ChrisAunchman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Middleboro, MA
Posts: 55
Re: 73-87 control arms?

Thanks, so I am thinking there is no advantage going with the 73-87 crossmemeber. I'll just make the holes bigger for the U-bolts.

Now I just have to determine if it is worth it to rebuild my '78 arms or go with tubular ones. I am thinking of going no more than 3" of drop in the front. Is it better to get the drop in the control arm? or Do drop spindles work just as well. I'm not to convinced on using drop coils. I have seen issues with alignments after that.

Last edited by ChrisAunchman; 10-11-2011 at 06:09 PM.
ChrisAunchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 06:17 PM   #13
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
Re: 73-87 control arms?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisAunchman View Post
Thanks, so I am thinking there is no advantage going with the 73-87 crossmemeber. I'll just make the holes bigger for the U-bolts.

Now I just have to determine if it is worth it to rebuild my '78 arms or go with tubular ones. I am thinking of going no more than 3" of drop in the front. Is it better to get the drop in the control arm? or Do drop spindles work just as well. I'm not to convinced on using drop coils. I have seen issues with alignments after that.
Definitely do spindles over dropped a-arms.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 06:30 PM   #14
ChrisAunchman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Middleboro, MA
Posts: 55
Re: 73-87 control arms?

Really....LOL I was so set on the arms.....Are spindles better for alignment purposes? If that is the case it may be better to keep the stock '78 arms under there then. I have already sandblasted the old control arms.
ChrisAunchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 07:50 PM   #15
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
Re: 73-87 control arms?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisAunchman View Post
Really....LOL I was so set on the arms.....Are spindles better for alignment purposes? If that is the case it may be better to keep the stock '78 arms under there then. I have already sandblasted the old control arms.
Dropped a-arms make a bad situation worse.... The spring pocket will be low enough that you constantly have to worry about both the pockets & the bushing/shafts hitting mother earth vs. just the bushings.

And, the spindles provide drop w/o changing shock or suspension travel. Dropped a-arms are the same thing as a cut spring so both shock & suspension geometry/travel are affected.

The down side of spindles are typically more issues w/back spacing related rubbing @ the lower a-arm lip (especially w/3" spindles).
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 08:54 PM   #16
ChrisAunchman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Middleboro, MA
Posts: 55
Re: 73-87 control arms?

WOW awesome information....I did notice on the how low the pocket was on the a-arms...I wonder how 2" drop spindles and 1" or 2" drop coils would work......
ChrisAunchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 09:59 PM   #17
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
Re: 73-87 control arms?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisAunchman View Post
WOW awesome information....I did notice on the how low the pocket was on the a-arms...I wonder how 2" drop spindles and 1" or 2" drop coils would work......
2.5" spindle & 2" coils work well. Very well....
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.

Last edited by SCOTI; 10-11-2011 at 10:05 PM.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 03:57 AM   #18
stsalvage
Scrapper 1
 
stsalvage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Riverside Calif
Posts: 1,649
Re: 73-87 control arms?

one they most people over look on theses front ends is on your truck before you take it apart.Look at how many shims are keeping that front end straight I have a 1965 3/4 ton and i swapped out a 1972 3/4 ton had nothing but problems with alinement.Later i was told all i had to do was change ball joints and use the 1971--72 disc brake spindle.My truck before i touched it never was in the alinement shop not one time in 35 years and it was a trash truck and a junk hauling truck before i did the swap
stsalvage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 07:18 AM   #19
ChrisAunchman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Middleboro, MA
Posts: 55
Re: 73-87 control arms?

Good point. I ussually always keep the shims labeled in 4 bags. The '78 frame I was able todo this. The '65 frame I am getting it bare with no A-arms on it.
ChrisAunchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 10:25 AM   #20
Chevy Fleetside
Registered User
 
Chevy Fleetside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 4,782
Re: 73-87 control arms?

I used drop spindles.
__________________
"A man and his truck, what a beautiful thing"

65 Short Fleetside BBC
65 Long Fleetside 283 3 on the tree for now.
my build thread http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...d.php?t=259536
Chevy Fleetside is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com