11-14-2012, 10:38 AM | #1 |
Always a work in progress
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Harker Heights, TX
Posts: 1,599
|
Cal Tracs
So sitting in the desert again so I have nothing but time to kill. I am curious as to how good Cal Tracs work on our heavy-@$$ trucks. I am working on an 85 C10 and want to try and get into the 10s some how some way. I already have the front suspension rebuilt and have everything but axles and brakes for my 9". I am going to use adjustable shocks on all corners and a drag radial(not sure on size yet). I will start with a stock 5.3 or 6.0 and plan on adding a turbo later on down the road.
__________________
USMC Retired Never trust a man who can't laugh at his own fart! 2010 Silverado Crew Cab 73 SWB 5.3/4l80e Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=695168 |
11-16-2012, 06:36 AM | #2 |
mini truck racer
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Baytown , texas
Posts: 3,010
|
Re: Cal Tracs
I cant speak for the fullsize trucks , but on my truck the caltracs and split monos work good . I will say that a drag radial is alot different then a conventional slick .
__________________
1949 5-window 1969 Camaro 1976 Chevy Luv yellow 1978 Chevy Luv Blue 1976 Chevy Luv Black 1979 Firebird Flooded in Harvey 1999 F350 Dually 2005 GMC Sierra 4.8 RCSB 2014 Explorer (wifes) My build :http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=399148 Build #2: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=653583 |
11-16-2012, 11:37 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: Cal Tracs
My buddy runs a 64 Nova Wagon. It is definitely weighted differently than a truck would be. On a 235 MT DR with a mono leaf and Caltracks, he went high 10's on motor with a dead hooked 1.56 60' and sprayed a 150 hit out of the hole cutting mid 1.4's. Unfortunately the motor had different ideas, every singlr main broke in it. He had to lift about the 1/8 mark. It would have gone real low 10's and maybe a high 9.
He is putting together a completely different deal, going blower this time around. But I figure it will run pretty hard on a 235 mono leaf Caltracks. Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
------Motor---------------Bottle 60'---1.53---------------1.41 1/8---6.58 @ 105.92----5.87 @ 118.41 1/4---10.38 @ 126.97----9.24 @ 142.49 |
11-16-2012, 09:19 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Wetumpka, Al, U.S.
Posts: 8,892
|
Re: Cal Tracs
If I had leaf spring I would run Cal Tracs for sure. I was real impressed with them on my buddies 67 Camaro. 406 turbo 350 drove to the trac on 275/60/15 drag radial went 7.0's 1/8 mile on Motor and 6.40 progressing a 200 shot. He went 10.20's in the quarter with a passenger.
__________________
Kevin Special Thanks to All who have helped on the TRUCK! My Pass Time Show http://s129.photobucket.com/albums/p...Chapter1-0.mp4 So Far my best Times are: Motor only: 6.44 1/8 @ 104.13 10.39 1/4 @ 125.83 Nitrous Times: 5.785 1/8 @ 118.65 with a 1.336 60ft 9.168 1/4 @ 142.58 with a 250 shot dead out of the hole! |
11-16-2012, 11:23 PM | #5 |
mini truck racer
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Baytown , texas
Posts: 3,010
|
Re: Cal Tracs
Caltracs do work . Hard to stray from what is proven but these look interesting . Again i have Caltracs
http://srdparts.com/index.php?page=s...emart&Itemid=1
__________________
1949 5-window 1969 Camaro 1976 Chevy Luv yellow 1978 Chevy Luv Blue 1976 Chevy Luv Black 1979 Firebird Flooded in Harvey 1999 F350 Dually 2005 GMC Sierra 4.8 RCSB 2014 Explorer (wifes) My build :http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=399148 Build #2: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=653583 |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|