02-06-2013, 05:58 PM | #26 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: okc, OKlahoma
Posts: 483
|
Re: New Toy!!!
|
02-06-2013, 08:15 PM | #27 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Quincy, FL
Posts: 533
|
Re: New Toy!!!
Quote:
I would argue that it makes no sense now days to build a performance engine without running a roller cam. The most cost effective way to run a roller is to use a late model block that is built for a roller cam. An older block from my understanding has to be clearanced for the roller lifter set up and the parts are more expensive than the kind used in the later block. I would start with a later block from the word go and you will be money ahead. The other factor is you can make the kinda power you are looking for out of a 350/355, you don't need to stroke it. Yes, cubes rule and it's cool to say you have a stroker but in my case it wasn't worth the bang for the buck. I still contend build a solid bottom end with forged pistons and roller everything and make horsepower with the heads. Besure to plan an exhaust that will allow the engine to breathe and don't forget a convertor and gears that will work with the engines power band. Vortec heads are an option but my information tells me that the port work required to make them flow like out of the box aluminum heads would pretty much cover the expense of the aluminum heads. The exception of course is if you can do the port work yourself, many home porting jobs do more damage than good. Your best bet is to find a reputable builder in your area and consult them and not relay on someone off of the internet, regardless of their expense. The last small block I built (a year or so ago) used an early steel crank and balancer, a 93 4 bolt 350 bored .030 over (355), magnafluxed, shot peened and polished stock rods, speed pro flat top forged pistons, tru-roller chain and gears, comp cam and lifter package (488/494 214/218 if memory serves) and set of worked fuelie heads I had (screw in studs, guide plates, roller tip 1.6 rockers), molly push rods and a 70 Z/28/vette intake with a Holley. It specced out at 460 horses and just under 500 ft lbs torque. Not sure I believe the 460 but it definitely 400-425 in my opinion. I would easy recommend this combo for anyone wanting moderate performance, the cam selection might vary due to the vehicle. Hope this helps. Good luck. |
|
02-06-2013, 11:54 PM | #28 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: okc, OKlahoma
Posts: 483
|
Re: New Toy!!!
Quote:
|
|
02-07-2013, 06:36 AM | #29 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Quincy, FL
Posts: 533
|
Re: New Toy!!!
Locate a good usable roller block 350, 4 bolt or 2 either one will do. If you plan to spin it hard then go with the 2 and splayed caps.
|
02-07-2013, 06:00 PM | #30 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: okc, OKlahoma
Posts: 483
|
Re: New Toy!!!
|
02-07-2013, 08:43 PM | #31 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Quincy, FL
Posts: 533
|
Re: New Toy!!!
Post a picture of the lifter galley to make sure it's not a roller block. If it is not one it can be converted but the parts are more expensive and from my understanding there is a need to clearance the block in the lifter galley area. We can tell more with the picture some earlier blocks have the bosses for the lifter spider.
|
02-07-2013, 09:39 PM | #32 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: okc, OKlahoma
Posts: 483
|
Re: New Toy!!!
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|