Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-02-2013, 12:03 AM | #26 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 390
|
Re: Are 4.8l vortecs really worth it?
Quote:
I still need to do more research, but the LS swap is the first priority at this point.
__________________
-Don- '66 C10 w/factory A/C '77 Cheyenne K5 350/465/205 '80 Custom Deluxe K20 350/465/205 '04 Denali XL '05 DMax CCLB 4x Have a Hickey Sidewinder Winch and need the owners/install manual? Send me a PM with your email address and I'll forward you a .pdf |
|
03-02-2013, 12:10 AM | #27 |
I know the pieces fit
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MONTGOMERY, AL
Posts: 5,523
|
Re: Are 4.8l vortecs really worth it?
You are Larry's son aren't you? I'm sure it will look factory when it's done, with both tranny's. The 4.8/SM465/NP205 will be really cool while it lasts, but the NV4500 will give it a new personality. Sounds fun, I'll be watching for that.
|
03-02-2013, 12:18 AM | #28 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 390
|
Re: Are 4.8l vortecs really worth it?
Quote:
FWIW, it looks like an '88 241 is also an option (now that we've completely highjacked this thread)
__________________
-Don- '66 C10 w/factory A/C '77 Cheyenne K5 350/465/205 '80 Custom Deluxe K20 350/465/205 '04 Denali XL '05 DMax CCLB 4x Have a Hickey Sidewinder Winch and need the owners/install manual? Send me a PM with your email address and I'll forward you a .pdf Last edited by Oilbrnr; 03-02-2013 at 12:32 AM. |
|
03-02-2013, 12:26 AM | #29 | |
I know the pieces fit
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MONTGOMERY, AL
Posts: 5,523
|
Re: Are 4.8l vortecs really worth it?
Quote:
|
|
03-03-2013, 08:28 PM | #30 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,189
|
Re: Are 4.8l vortecs really worth it?
I have owned 4.8 and 5.3 new Tahoes, Yukons, Sivlerados. Sierras, etc., and there is a difference in acceleration ability with the 5.3. If you kick down the accelerator on the 5.3 will take off a bit faster. However, in daily easy driving, especially in the city, there is no difference in performance. I would say gas mileage is about 2 mpg better in the city with the 4.8. I tried to get 3.42 rear axle ratio (or lower) on those new vehicles and got 15.5 city/18.5 highway on my last 2010 ext. cab. Sierra with 3.23 (I think) rear axle ratio.
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|