The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1947 - 1959 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-04-2016, 09:10 PM   #1
hotrod1
56 - autocross
 
hotrod1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Camarillo, Ca
Posts: 1,121
Question?

Why do you think they put cab mount brackets/arm on these chassis instead of just bolting directly the cab directly to the frame?
Attached Images
 
hotrod1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2016, 09:40 PM   #2
joedoh
Senior Member
 
joedoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Doodah Kansas
Posts: 7,774
Re: Question?

torque!

torque is force x distance, you can think of it as leverage or advantage when, the farther you are from the point force is applied, the more torque you can apply.

if they mounted the cab to the frame , every part of the body outside of the frame would be subject to torque, leading to doors that dont shut, warped floors, etc, because the weight applied at the door frame would have a force applied between the door frame and the body mount.

so they kick it out as far as they can, using plate steel instead of flimsy sheetmetal, minimize the torque. its why they went away from the center cab mounts too.
__________________
the mass of men live lives of quiet desperation


if there is a problem, I can have it.

new project WAYNE http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=844393
joedoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2016, 09:43 PM   #3
hotrod1
56 - autocross
 
hotrod1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Camarillo, Ca
Posts: 1,121
Re: Question?

Ok, good reason. So why are the rear ones closer to the chassis than the front ones?
hotrod1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2016, 10:03 PM   #4
joedoh
Senior Member
 
joedoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Doodah Kansas
Posts: 7,774
Re: Question?

its only slightly, more stepping and pushing and shifting in the front would be my guess
__________________
the mass of men live lives of quiet desperation


if there is a problem, I can have it.

new project WAYNE http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=844393
joedoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2016, 10:05 PM   #5
hotrod1
56 - autocross
 
hotrod1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Camarillo, Ca
Posts: 1,121
Re: Question?

Thanks for the info.

One more question. Why are those arms sloped down instead of being level? Lower the cab?
hotrod1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2016, 10:10 PM   #6
joedoh
Senior Member
 
joedoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Doodah Kansas
Posts: 7,774
Re: Question?

they are level with the frame.

__________________
the mass of men live lives of quiet desperation


if there is a problem, I can have it.

new project WAYNE http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=844393
joedoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2016, 10:25 PM   #7
mr48chev
Registered User
 
mr48chev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toppenish, WA
Posts: 15,713
Re: Question?

I want some of what Joe's smokin.

I'd have to say the short version is that the engineers decided that with the wider cab on the AD trucks they wanted the cab supports further outboard Which also saved having to put much stronger supports under the floor.

The other thing is that on the assembly line it may have eased installing the cab on the frame having the supports out where it was easy to connect things.
__________________
Founding member of the too many projects, too little time and money club.

My ongoing truck projects:
48 Chev 3100 that will run a 292 Six.
71 GMC 2500 that is getting a Cad 500 transplant.
77 C 30 dualie, 454, 4 speed with a 10 foot flatbed and hoist. It does the heavy work and hauls the projects around.
mr48chev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2016, 10:28 PM   #8
hotrod1
56 - autocross
 
hotrod1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Camarillo, Ca
Posts: 1,121
Re: Question?

Quote:
Originally Posted by joedoh View Post
they are level with the frame.

Most of the ones that I have seen on our year trucks are sloped down.
Attached Images
 
hotrod1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2016, 10:29 PM   #9
mr48chev
Registered User
 
mr48chev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toppenish, WA
Posts: 15,713
Re: Question?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hotrod1 View Post
Thanks for the info.

One more question. Why are those arms sloped down instead of being level? Lower the cab?
If they slope down it's because the crossmember under the bellhousing has been cut out and the frame has twisted due to the weight of the cab pushing down on the cab support brackets.

That is real common on V8 swap trucks with the stock frame that run and automatic. It's also the reason a lot of trucks don't have the hood fitted up right.

The cab will sag until the bottom of the floor is sitting on the frame rails.
__________________
Founding member of the too many projects, too little time and money club.

My ongoing truck projects:
48 Chev 3100 that will run a 292 Six.
71 GMC 2500 that is getting a Cad 500 transplant.
77 C 30 dualie, 454, 4 speed with a 10 foot flatbed and hoist. It does the heavy work and hauls the projects around.
mr48chev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2016, 10:31 PM   #10
hotrod1
56 - autocross
 
hotrod1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Camarillo, Ca
Posts: 1,121
Re: Question?

That's interesting but I have not seen one that was not sloped.
hotrod1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2016, 11:07 PM   #11
joedoh
Senior Member
 
joedoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Doodah Kansas
Posts: 7,774
Re: Question?

well, the one in your original post is flat. so now you have seen two (the one I posted)

The one I posted is a 53, is it possible you are talking about TF trucks? 55-59?
__________________
the mass of men live lives of quiet desperation


if there is a problem, I can have it.

new project WAYNE http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=844393
joedoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2016, 11:34 PM   #12
hotrod1
56 - autocross
 
hotrod1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Camarillo, Ca
Posts: 1,121
Re: Question?

Quote:
Originally Posted by joedoh View Post
well, the one in your original post is flat. so now you have seen two (the one I posted)

The one I posted is a 53, is it possible you are talking about TF trucks? 55-59?
Yep, the one I first posted is flat. I dont know what year it is, but I think that last one is the 55-59.
hotrod1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2016, 07:08 AM   #13
mphudak
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 196
Re: Question?

The original post pic is a 47-55.1 mid body mount for a suburban and panel truck. It is level when it comes off the chassis. Similar to front body/cab mount but is narrower and smaller scale.

If you need any other info on them, let me know. I have a set sitting the in the garage waiting to be put back on the chassis.
__________________
55.1 GMC Suburban Hydramatic
mphudak is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com