The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board > The 1973 - 1991 Blazers, Jimmys, and Suburbans Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-15-2007, 06:56 PM   #1
79blazer
Registered User
 
79blazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 136
Suspension questions

What makes the newer trucks ride so good? Can the leaf springs on the 88-98 trucks fit a 77-87 truck? I want a Cadillac ride. New shocks are better than worn shocks, but if I put on the 1 ton shocks, wouldn’t it eliminate the bounce or shake after a bump?
__________________
79 Blazer Cheyenne, 2wd 305 3.42 stock
85 Caprice, TBI converted, new 350 crate motor, Monte Carlo SS Wheels, Bilstein shocks,
79blazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2007, 11:48 PM   #2
rcbildr
Registered User
 
rcbildr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Gold Bar, WA
Posts: 1,216
Re: Suspension questions

IFS and a longer wheelbase.
__________________
My Projects:
1960 GMC 1/2ton with 305 V6 (daily driver)
1963 Chevy 1/2ton 2wd...converting to 4x4
1967 Suburban 1/2ton 2wd

My Girlfriends Projects
1985 Chevy Suburban 3/4ton 4x4 with 6.2L diesel, 4" lift, converted to TH-400, Warn Premium manual hubs, & Wildcat 315/75/R16 tires. (daily driver)
1978 Camaro Type LT with a Marine 350 & vortec heads, Rochester Carb, & roller cam
1978 Camaro Z28
rcbildr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2007, 11:57 PM   #3
79blazer
Registered User
 
79blazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 136
Re: Suspension questions

mine is a 79 2wd blazer. with IFS.
__________________
79 Blazer Cheyenne, 2wd 305 3.42 stock
85 Caprice, TBI converted, new 350 crate motor, Monte Carlo SS Wheels, Bilstein shocks,
79blazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2007, 12:41 AM   #4
rcbildr
Registered User
 
rcbildr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Gold Bar, WA
Posts: 1,216
Re: Suspension questions

Sorry, I should've read your signature. New shocks are almost always a good thing, but I'm not sure if the 1-ton shocks would be the way to go. My friend bought a set of the edlebrock shocks for his truck and his truck rode better afterwards.
__________________
My Projects:
1960 GMC 1/2ton with 305 V6 (daily driver)
1963 Chevy 1/2ton 2wd...converting to 4x4
1967 Suburban 1/2ton 2wd

My Girlfriends Projects
1985 Chevy Suburban 3/4ton 4x4 with 6.2L diesel, 4" lift, converted to TH-400, Warn Premium manual hubs, & Wildcat 315/75/R16 tires. (daily driver)
1978 Camaro Type LT with a Marine 350 & vortec heads, Rochester Carb, & roller cam
1978 Camaro Z28
rcbildr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2007, 01:22 AM   #5
79blazer
Registered User
 
79blazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 136
Re: Suspension questions

I think I am going to go to the salvage yard tomorrow and pull a set to see if it works. Would rear shocks off a van fit also?
__________________
79 Blazer Cheyenne, 2wd 305 3.42 stock
85 Caprice, TBI converted, new 350 crate motor, Monte Carlo SS Wheels, Bilstein shocks,
79blazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2007, 04:21 AM   #6
79blazer
Registered User
 
79blazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 136
Re: Suspension questions

I just want it to be more "dampened" than new shocks can provide. I think the shocks from a heavier vehicle will do this. http://www.carbibles.com/suspension_bible.html
__________________
79 Blazer Cheyenne, 2wd 305 3.42 stock
85 Caprice, TBI converted, new 350 crate motor, Monte Carlo SS Wheels, Bilstein shocks,
79blazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2007, 07:11 AM   #7
tvblazer78
Low & Fast!
 
tvblazer78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 3,110
Re: Suspension questions

On my 78 2wd Blazer I put 92-94 4x4 full size blazer leaf springs on, this made it ride better then it did. So you could think about trying that.

Trav
tvblazer78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 01:43 PM   #8
kevinr1970
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,316
Re: Suspension questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvblazer78 View Post
On my 78 2wd Blazer I put 92-94 4x4 full size blazer leaf springs on, this made it ride better then it did. So you could think about trying that.

Trav
I thought you had said in a previous post that with these springs it also lowered it around 2"?
I have a chance to get a set of these for free but the guy that has them tells me that on the older K5's and Sub's ('73-91) the springs were either 52" or 56" (or something like that) and the newer full-size Blazer springs are 60" or 62" (or something like that).
Did you have to modify anything else to use these springs or was it a bolt in deal?
The guy that has them suggested that maybe with the longer length it would cause the shackles to lay flatter-out there-by lowering the ride height???
__________________
2009 Honda Fit CfC (bsf 44.9 mpg)
2000 Tahoe Limited
1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 2wd, will end up swb, not dually and replace CCswb below
1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 4x4, just going to fix things up for now
1982/1989 K5/GMC Jimmy 2wd
1987 GMC 1/2 ton swb 2wd Crew (sold)
kevinr1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 02:05 PM   #9
tvblazer78
Low & Fast!
 
tvblazer78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 3,110
Re: Suspension questions

That is right they are longer but only 2-3 inches, I just bolted them up no cutting. If you put your springs and the new springs next to each other, you will see a bigger arch and a little longer. But when you have a bigger arch it will not be as long. So just try it and see how it go's. If you need any pic's just let me know.

Trav


Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinr1970 View Post
I thought you had said in a previous post that with these springs it also lowered it around 2"?
I have a chance to get a set of these for free but the guy that has them tells me that on the older K5's and Sub's ('73-91) the springs were either 52" or 56" (or something like that) and the newer full-size Blazer springs are 60" or 62" (or something like that).
Did you have to modify anything else to use these springs or was it a bolt in deal?
The guy that has them suggested that maybe with the longer length it would cause the shackles to lay flatter-out there-by lowering the ride height???
tvblazer78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 03:41 PM   #10
kevinr1970
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,316
Re: Suspension questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvblazer78 View Post
But when you have a bigger arch it will not be as long.
Sorry but that confused me a little.
If they have a bigger arch wouldn't that make it sit higher?
Or did you do a flip kit on the rear? Bigger arch negates some of the flip kit so instead of 4"-6" you net only 2"?
To clarify you installed the new style springs and netted a 2" drop?
__________________
2009 Honda Fit CfC (bsf 44.9 mpg)
2000 Tahoe Limited
1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 2wd, will end up swb, not dually and replace CCswb below
1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 4x4, just going to fix things up for now
1982/1989 K5/GMC Jimmy 2wd
1987 GMC 1/2 ton swb 2wd Crew (sold)
kevinr1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 05:11 PM   #11
tvblazer78
Low & Fast!
 
tvblazer78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 3,110
Re: Suspension questions

That is right I did have to flip it. But I think is was about 2"-3" of drop.


Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinr1970 View Post
Sorry but that confused me a little.
If they have a bigger arch wouldn't that make it sit higher?
Or did you do a flip kit on the rear? Bigger arch negates some of the flip kit so instead of 4"-6" you net only 2"?
To clarify you installed the new style springs and netted a 2" drop?
tvblazer78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 06:25 PM   #12
79blazer
Registered User
 
79blazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 136
Re: Suspension questions

Is there a difference between the 92-94 Blazer springs and half ton k1500truck springs? The blazer springs may be harder to find. I want the empty stance higher, so that when I put on a trailer, it doesn't squat at the back end. Right now if I put a trailer on it, the hitch is about a foot off the ground.
__________________
79 Blazer Cheyenne, 2wd 305 3.42 stock
85 Caprice, TBI converted, new 350 crate motor, Monte Carlo SS Wheels, Bilstein shocks,

Last edited by 79blazer; 04-02-2007 at 06:26 PM.
79blazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 08:24 PM   #13
kevinr1970
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,316
Re: Suspension questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvblazer78 View Post
That is right I did have to flip it. But I think is was about 2"-3" of drop.
All right, makes sence now.
I am going to lower my Blazer but don't want to slam it. 2" front and rear would be about perfect.
I prefer my trucks to sit level so the new style springs with flip kit and 2' spindles in the front shuold sit it down just enough.
Then big meats in the bck to get it level.
If you see any flaws in my theory please point them out!
__________________
2009 Honda Fit CfC (bsf 44.9 mpg)
2000 Tahoe Limited
1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 2wd, will end up swb, not dually and replace CCswb below
1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 4x4, just going to fix things up for now
1982/1989 K5/GMC Jimmy 2wd
1987 GMC 1/2 ton swb 2wd Crew (sold)
kevinr1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2007, 10:35 PM   #14
tvblazer78
Low & Fast!
 
tvblazer78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 3,110
Re: Suspension questions

Sounds good to me... Should look good!!!


Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinr1970 View Post
All right, makes sence now.
I am going to lower my Blazer but don't want to slam it. 2" front and rear would be about perfect.
I prefer my trucks to sit level so the new style springs with flip kit and 2' spindles in the front shuold sit it down just enough.
Then big meats in the bck to get it level.
If you see any flaws in my theory please point them out!
tvblazer78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2007, 12:01 AM   #15
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
Re: Suspension questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by 79blazer View Post
Is there a difference between the 92-94 Blazer springs and half ton k1500truck springs? The blazer springs may be harder to find. I want the empty stance higher, so that when I put on a trailer, it doesn't squat at the back end. Right now if I put a trailer on it, the hitch is about a foot off the ground.
I suggest you invest in a quality set of shocks that are intended for your truck. Mixing and matching springs and shocks are a big guessing game.

If you want to improve your towing capability and keep a decent ride when you aren't towing use a set of "helper" style air bags. You can raise the back as high as you want with the trailer on, and let it back down when not towing...
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com