Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-23-2008, 04:40 AM | #26 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 14
|
Re: lowering spindles vs. Lowering control arms
Yep you can run stock ones on there but if they have been on a long time like mine were its prob better to spend the extra and get the new shocks. I did my spindles today in bout 3 hours, took me a little longer than i figured due to the lower Ball joint not wanting to pop out as planned.. i had to pull out the persuader to assist me. Other than that it was easy to do and looks really good. Tommorow its onto the rear end once i get the box off.
|
03-23-2008, 06:04 PM | #27 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 910
|
Re: lowering spindles vs. Lowering control arms
Another advantage to LCAs is they provide a better ball joint angles. I used 3" lowering LCAs and lowering springs. I also purchased new tubular upper control arms. I had to put in longer studs for the uppers to get the correct alignment. The LCAs are nice and they sit level to the ground which is better for handling. I don't think I had any issues with ground clearance that I can remember. I have 17" rims so I didn't have any issues there either.
__________________
83 C10 Stepside (SOLD, it was a blast!) 383 MASS-FLO EFI/TKO II 600/3.90 Posi 10 bolt S475 and C4 DM running, fine tuning turbo= Douchebag Racing: Runs Fine all the Time |
05-24-2008, 07:21 PM | #28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,223
|
Re: lowering spindles vs. Lowering control arms
Hey Wild83C10, where did you get the longer studs from? I have waaaay too much neg camber with my DJM 3" drop control arms.
__________________
- Greg |
05-25-2008, 12:16 AM | #29 | |
It Is What It Is,,,,
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: *The Gun Shine State*Florida*
Posts: 1,765
|
Re: lowering spindles vs. Lowering control arms
Quote:
Me too,, Ive also thought about getting the DJM upper control arms. They are made to help that out.
__________________
*79 C10 Short Box ST8 6 bang'r * *Lowered w/ 3" Control arms, 2" Lower Coils and 4" shackles and hangers W/ FLIP KIT *__--__* 79 C-10 project* .........................__ ..............._____ l __\___ ..............|_(O)_ |___(O) ] FAQ INDEX Thread The Kulture My Rat Den |
|
05-25-2008, 05:59 AM | #30 |
Happy to be here
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
|
Re: lowering spindles vs. Lowering control arms
Yes, I have heard of them breaking, but can't say that I have personally seen them break so I will let that go. On the other hand I have been burned by the sleazy pond scum sucking jack masters at AIM Industries and refuse to support low life pieces of crap regardless of how cheap their product is.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra" Last edited by N2TRUX; 05-25-2008 at 06:00 AM. |
05-25-2008, 07:28 AM | #31 |
Registered Penetrator
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 153
|
Re: lowering spindles vs. Lowering control arms
Damn. I am in the same department. I have an '80 Silverado that I am trying to lower and I was looking into these spindles, guess I won't be getting them after all.
__________________
"Some people wear Superman pajamas. Superman wears Chuck Norris pajamas." "Chuck Norris is the only person on the planet that can kick you in the back of the face." "Chuck Norris doesn't 'tea-bag'... he 'potato-sacks.'" |
05-26-2008, 11:55 PM | #32 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,223
|
Re: lowering spindles vs. Lowering control arms
Quote:
__________________
- Greg |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|