Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-06-2011, 09:39 AM | #1 |
TruckincrazY
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Haslet, TX
Posts: 493
|
I'm starting to get frustrated
I know the answers are here, but my brain is mush at this point regarding my swap. I am trying to nail down the fuel situation. I thought I had it figured out and decided on getting an '87 fuel tank with an internal pump and new sender. Then I panicked after I ordered the fuel tank because I started to think about my fuel gauge. I am keeping the stock dash from my '84 and will be running a 6.0 w/ a 700r4. Will the fuel gauge/sending unit from an '87 work together for the mechanical dash? I am seriously considering ditching the new tank idea and just going with an external walbro pump. From my understanding, I can use my stock fuel tank/sending unit, then use the walbro after with a filter/regulator depending on the fuel rail set up. This will be a cheaper option because I won't have to pay my shop to drop the tank and all that stuff. I will just have to make sure I keep a decent amount of fuel in the tank to avoid starvation issues. I have cancelled my fuel tank order until I figure this stuff out. I want this swap to go as smooth as possible and little stuff like this is what kept me from previously attempting the swap. Can someone help me get my mind right and back on track?
__________________
My build thread - '84 2wd w/ a 6.0 swap http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=433595 |
01-06-2011, 10:02 AM | #2 |
meowMEOWmeowMEOW
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 7,128
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
If its anything like the older trucks, the most you would have to do is change/add a resistor in line with the sending unit. IIRC the pre 70's trucks had 0-30 ohm, and the newer style was 0-90 ohm. Since it sounds like all the stuff your using is newer, the sending unit should be fine.
__________________
'66 Short Step / SD Tuned / Big Cam LQ4 / Backhalfed /Built 4l80e / #REBUILDEVERYTHING MY BUILD THE H8RDCPTR //\\ MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL REV J HD
|
01-06-2011, 10:28 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: sc
Posts: 1,203
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
Fuel pump has nothing to do with fuel gauge, other than how fast it goes to E, LOL
__________________
71 Cheyenne C10 LWB cam'd 6.0/T56 Swap |
01-06-2011, 01:29 PM | #4 |
69' Chevy Stepside
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Anchorage, Ak
Posts: 526
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
Sounds like you should just stay with your original stock tank unless there is something wrong with it. Then run the inline walbro pump to your rail with regulator and return line back to the tank.
__________________
-Matthew -69' Chevy Custom/10 Shortbed Stepside 2WD "Copperhead" - Restored, 6.0L LQ9 Built. L92 Heads and LS3 Intake with Comp Cam 223/231 .610/.617 112 LSA, 4L60E with Shift Kit and Circle-D 3200 Stall Converter ~Build Thread -1957 Chevy BelAir 2 Door Post Sedan, Full Frame off Restoration done myself - 6.0L with T56 six speed -1957 Chevy BelAir 2 Door Post Sedan - Nearly rust free AK car, Project in the waiting -2003' Chevy Silverado SS AWD 6.0L! - Daily Driver |
01-06-2011, 04:05 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Berryville, AR
Posts: 792
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
Unless I am mistaken you should not have starvation issues with the external pump.. Those issues arise with non baffled tanks with internal pumps. I will agree with matthew above. Stock tank, sending unit, external pump and filter/reg set up.
This depends on you motor being 2004 or newer as they have a returnless system. If older you should reference mr.rhino's "Silver Dollar" thread on his return system. You might want to look over this thread as well... http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/conver...or-filter.html
__________________
Rex Last edited by RocketKing; 01-06-2011 at 05:46 PM. |
01-06-2011, 04:23 PM | #6 |
TruckincrazY
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Haslet, TX
Posts: 493
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
Thanks for the responses! I know this is simple stuff for some of you, so I appreciate you taking the time to offer advice. I will go with the external setup. I haven't gotten the engine yet, so I don't know if I'll need the corvette regulator/filter. I have been reading and have heard of people tapping the filler neck for the return line. I have dual tanks, but I'm only going to use one. So I may already have a line running back from the original smog stuff. My truck is in the paint shop, so I can't access it to take a look at the current setup. This will save me some coin from not having to pay the shop to drop the tank.
__________________
My build thread - '84 2wd w/ a 6.0 swap http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=433595 |
01-06-2011, 09:00 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 1,245
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
The senders should have the same resistance so gauge should work. I ran an external pump on a TBI conversion in my 79 TA and can tell you they are REALLY LOUD. One advantage of running an in tank pump is to reduce noise. I didn't keep the car long after that but have heard that due to less heat the in tank pump will also last longer. I would consider a newer tank running a TPI pump in the sender for the higher pressure.
__________________
56 GMC BUILD THREAD: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=368649 69 long bed Chevy turned 67 gmc jimmy roadster: https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=851167 |
01-06-2011, 09:04 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 1,245
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
Plus.. if it ever dies far from home wouldn't it be nice to get factory style parts that are easy to get at the parts store? OReillys can get a 91 camaro fuel pump quicker than a holley in line, and probably cheaper. I try to avoid to many special order aftermarket parts for that reason.
__________________
56 GMC BUILD THREAD: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=368649 69 long bed Chevy turned 67 gmc jimmy roadster: https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=851167 |
01-06-2011, 09:44 PM | #9 |
Addicted to Rust
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Abbeville SC
Posts: 1,030
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
use the 87 up tank and meter, cooler pumps, more consistent fuel supply and a ready made return line. I can attest to the fact that the baffled tanks are a must. My crewcab had earlier tanks installed when it was shortened, and would stumble under braking with less than 1/4 tank. I am installing 2 new tanks with higher capacity pumps in my swap.
Jay
__________________
Current trucks: (48 GMC100 320 inliner) Gone (48 Suburban in pieces) Sold 87 GMC CCSB 5.3 4l60E Daily Driver ECTA National record holder XO/PP We never really grow up, we just learn how to act in public. |
01-07-2011, 06:32 PM | #10 | |
Home Built '87
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 1,829
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
Quote:
I'm just putting my list together for my 6.0L swap, but I did buy the '87 tanks yesterday because I am scared about overheating the pumps so I'm going with in-tank pumps. Here are some post to check out, might help: Glock's Fred build: post# 470, 547, 552, 692, 920, 1334, 1373, 1551, 1539, 1556, 1845, 1854 Menace: 105, 159, 226, 271, 464, 510, 512, 525, 701, 762, That should be the best ones I have taken notes on myself to get you through this stage. Hope it helps!
__________________
Gordon 1998 White Chev ext cab 2WD (Summer Project) http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=408424 1987 Chev Silverado SWB (Winter Project Rebuild) http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=424833 Truck Club http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=466969 Last edited by Gordonr1973; 01-07-2011 at 06:33 PM. |
|
01-07-2011, 09:14 PM | #11 |
LSX addict
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 262
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
i went with the intank pump for the heat issue as well for my 6.0. pump runs cooler, last longer. and i like to use GM parts. there are plenty of great aftermarket companies but oem quality is hard to beat.
|
01-07-2011, 10:43 PM | #12 |
TruckincrazY
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Haslet, TX
Posts: 493
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
Thanks for the responses everyone. I spoke to the shop that is going to do the work and they are gonna let me know what the labor cost difference is between a tank swap and using an external pump. The best prices I found show that an external pump will only be about 40 bucks cheaper than a new tank, sending unit, and internal pump.
I just get overwhelmed when I don't know how to do some of these things. I have to realize there are people who do it every day. I just try and plan stuff to the nth degree, so when I get to something I can't figure out, I want to say screw it all. I'm sticking with it though, so wish me luck!
__________________
My build thread - '84 2wd w/ a 6.0 swap http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=433595 |
01-12-2011, 06:03 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: AL
Posts: 2,517
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
Quote:
|
|
01-12-2011, 07:00 PM | #14 |
1965 Chevy C10, 2005 4.8L/4l60
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 8,546
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
Guys, are the Walbro externals noisey? I have a Pierburg and I can only hear it when it turns on before I start.
__________________
Clyde65 Rebuild of Clyde http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post8338184 69 Aristocrat Lo Liner build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post7561684 support our troops! |
01-12-2011, 10:16 PM | #15 |
TruckincrazY
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Haslet, TX
Posts: 493
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
Well I decided to go the internal route. I actually bought the pump and sending unit tonight for 151 bucks shipped! I will order the tank next week maybe. I will go ahead and pay the extra money to have my shop put it in. Once it's done, I will have no regrets. Knowing me, I'd probably regret not going internal, so I'll just do it from the start. This build is about doing what I want, which is what I didn't do on my last swap. It may take a little longer, but I want it done my way!
__________________
My build thread - '84 2wd w/ a 6.0 swap http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=433595 |
01-12-2011, 10:37 PM | #16 |
69' Chevy Stepside
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Anchorage, Ak
Posts: 526
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
I'm running one mounted in the rear under the bed and the only time you really hear it is when on turn the key to "ON" and it primes the fuel system then once the truck starts you can't even hear it over the engine noise and road noise. I think it matters mostly where you mount it, I can see it being really loud if you mounted it like under the cab or something but back under the bed is the perfect spot for it IMO.
__________________
-Matthew -69' Chevy Custom/10 Shortbed Stepside 2WD "Copperhead" - Restored, 6.0L LQ9 Built. L92 Heads and LS3 Intake with Comp Cam 223/231 .610/.617 112 LSA, 4L60E with Shift Kit and Circle-D 3200 Stall Converter ~Build Thread -1957 Chevy BelAir 2 Door Post Sedan, Full Frame off Restoration done myself - 6.0L with T56 six speed -1957 Chevy BelAir 2 Door Post Sedan - Nearly rust free AK car, Project in the waiting -2003' Chevy Silverado SS AWD 6.0L! - Daily Driver Last edited by matthew20061; 01-12-2011 at 10:38 PM. |
01-12-2011, 11:44 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: AL
Posts: 2,517
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
I had one mounted to the frame under the cab of my 67 and it was pretty loud. I can hear the vortec pump in my blazer tank once you turn the key on but not running.
|
01-13-2011, 12:10 PM | #18 | |
LSX addict
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 262
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
Quote:
|
|
01-13-2011, 12:47 PM | #19 |
TruckincrazY
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Haslet, TX
Posts: 493
|
Re: I'm starting to get frustrated
Oh yeah, thanks! I have heard the horror stories, lol!
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
My build thread - '84 2wd w/ a 6.0 swap http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=433595 |
Bookmarks |
|
|