The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain > LSx Swaps

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-23-2011, 05:28 PM   #1
JJAB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Waco,Texas
Posts: 143
One more time 317 vs. L92

Okay guys, I know this has been discussed and I also know that there are a million variables that are to be considered. The sad part about this is that I have not made my unltimate decision on what vehicle I am putting this in, but here goes.

I am trying to decide between ported 317 castings vs. stock l92 plus ls3 intake. My goal is to make 350 to 375 RWHP. The mill is a LQ9. All other things considered are the vehicle will have 3.73's, headers, it will stay fuel injected, 2200 to 2500 stall. I have a cam laying around that spes out at 218/228 @.050 and .525/.525 lift @.050.
JJAB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 07:05 PM   #2
Clyde65
1965 Chevy C10, 2005 4.8L/4l60
 
Clyde65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 8,546
Re: One more time 317 vs. L92

A stock LQ9, with a mild cam, headers and good tune, should have no problem making 375 RWHP I would think.
__________________
Clyde65

Rebuild of Clyde
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post8338184

69 Aristocrat Lo Liner build
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post7561684



support our troops!
Clyde65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2011, 11:59 PM   #3
Shon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: sc
Posts: 1,203
Re: One more time 317 vs. L92

your goals are low if you are looking at ported heads in either variation. I have several almost 400 to the wheels with just a cam in 346s/LS1s and I have some almost 500s with LS3 heads/cam/LS2.

I am a bigger fan of the cathedral heads if you going for MPH at the track but if you just want to make power it can be done with either set. I have seen cathedral heads run quicker at the track in comparison to the retangular ports and I am not sure if thats a mismatch of cam/heads or just better air flow from cathedrals.

I have a customer with a 23x/25x cam with stock LS3 heads/intake making nearly 500. He also has a 01 Z28 that makes almost 400 with just a cam.

The retangular heads are 'cheap' but there is more to it, you have rocker arms to get, intake to get too. so the cost goes up.

And that cam you have would be better suited for the cathedrals, the I/E split is not enough for the retangular heads from what i have seen, and if you want to sale that cam let me know, we love that cam...it makes great torque and helps with our 'tow' packages.
__________________
71 Cheyenne C10 LWB cam'd 6.0/T56 Swap
Shon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2011, 02:10 AM   #4
clinebarger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 6,370
Re: One more time 317 vs. L92

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJAB View Post
My goal is to make 350 to 375 RWHP.
A well tuned STOCK LQ9/4L65E will make those numbers.
clinebarger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2011, 10:21 AM   #5
JJAB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Waco,Texas
Posts: 143
Re: One more time 317 vs. L92

Thanks guys for your input. Your information has helped me make my decision.
JJAB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2011, 11:42 PM   #6
softballnrd27
Always a work in progress
 
softballnrd27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Harker Heights, TX
Posts: 1,599
Re: One more time 317 vs. L92

No reason to port or change the 317s, get a good valve job and you should very easily make your power goals. If you want a little more power, get a little bit more cam.
__________________
USMC Retired
Never trust a man who can't laugh at his own fart!
2010 Silverado Crew Cab
73 SWB 5.3/4l80e
Build Thread:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=695168
softballnrd27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2011, 02:07 PM   #7
BR3W CITY
meowMEOWmeowMEOW
 
BR3W CITY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 7,128
Re: One more time 317 vs. L92

Quote:
Originally Posted by softballnrd27 View Post
No reason to port or change the 317s, get a good valve job and you should very easily make your power goals. If you want a little more power, get a little bit more cam.

porting the 317's won't hurt, a little more flow is always a good thing
I just wouldn't mill them or do anything to raise compression any more on an lq9
__________________
'66 Short Step / SD Tuned / Big Cam LQ4 / Backhalfed /Built 4l80e / #REBUILDEVERYTHING

MY BUILD THE H8RDCPTR //\\ MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL REV J HD
BR3W CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2011, 07:29 PM   #8
mooseknuckles
Registered User
 
mooseknuckles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: ottawa,canada
Posts: 4,550
Re: One more time 317 vs. L92

http://www.carcraft.com/projectbuild...k/viewall.html
mooseknuckles is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com