![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: thousand oaks, California
Posts: 732
|
1971 question
My dad wants me to buy this 1971 chevy pu with a 305 and a 3 speed auto poise rear, new dash, in primer. the owner says it has 71 k original miles (says speedo still works) and was brought up from california a couple of years ago. I haven't seen a picture yet so it's hard to say it's worth the 3600 he wants for it. the question is are there any issues i need to look for. common rust areas, the 305 is a ..... motor... any advise will be helpful. not planning on restoring it like the 53 i have,i just want to drive it!
if it all checks out thinking on offering $2500 i figure it's exempt from calif smog right?! Thanks Guys! GT
__________________
Greg 1953 chevy 1/2 ton 5 window, chevy 350 330 horse 700r tranz, lowering spindels mustang 2 frount. ford 9", airbags on 4 corners . purchased in 1983 for $325 while in high school http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=215079&page=5 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,089
|
Re: 1971 question
Cab corners, rockers, floor boards, cab mounts, under the cal and check the roof. Mostly just rockers and cab corners.
Posted via Mobile Device |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 108
|
Re: 1971 question
Yep. Smog exempt. I just found rust at the top of the windshield (inside) on mine.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lake Ariel PA
Posts: 5
|
Re: 1971 question
The 305 isn't a bad motor. It all depends on how much $$$ you want to throw at it. If you put a set of Edelbrock heads, a decent cam and an Edelbrock carb and intake. You can get about 400hp from a 305. An old timer once told me, "the bottom end isn't where the horsepower is, it's in the top end. You just need to know how to wake the motor up." The downside is you'll spend about $1500-$2000 in the process.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Moderator
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 20,117
|
Re: 1971 question
Is it a LWB or a SWB truck?
__________________
1972 C/10 Cheyenne Super SWB. Restored, loaded, slammed. 1968 C/10 50th Anniversary LWB. Unrestored, stock, daily driver/work truck. RIP ElJay RIP 67ChevyRedneck RIP Grumpy Old Man RIP FleetsidePaul |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: coffeyville, Kansas
Posts: 195
|
Re: 1971 question
Is it a 305 or a 307 ? there is a diffrence an the 307 would have been the common motor for those years , along with looking at body areas mentione above , look at the wiring , under the hood , the dash an Rear around the lights most splicing will be done there.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fall River California
Posts: 2,027
|
Re: 1971 question
Also check the cab mounts, they rust as well. The first thing I do when I buy one of these trucks is take a hose to the inside can corners, clear the drains in the doors, the drains in the cab mounts and shove a hose down the vents under the cowl. You will be amazed how much crap builds up in those areas. Gets some pics from the guy!
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v655/aaronhero/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
"I ain't nobody, dork."
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,978
|
Re: 1971 question
305's weren't even thunk of yet when these trucks were sold. So it's not the original 71K engine that it's claimed to have. The 305 would actually bring the value of the rig down if you ask me.
Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars... My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread. The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: thousand oaks, California
Posts: 732
|
Re: 1971 question
interesting comments guys as soon as i have picts ill post them. he said it was an 8 foot bed. probably a dumb question but i heard a 327 can have bad gas milage but a 350 can get better milage. what about this 305 / 307? my 53 (with a 350) is getting around 15 if i'm good. every one tells me to expect 9 mpg...
thanks for the help! GT
__________________
Greg 1953 chevy 1/2 ton 5 window, chevy 350 330 horse 700r tranz, lowering spindels mustang 2 frount. ford 9", airbags on 4 corners . purchased in 1983 for $325 while in high school http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=215079&page=5 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 12
|
Re: 1971 question
the roof rust is a very common problem they never treated the metal on the inside of the roof but it took 40 years for this to start to happening. Also check your cab supports and floor.
__________________
1972 K10 Stepside: SBC 350, TH350 Transmission, NP205, 4 inch lift, 33" tires. Frame Off Restoration 2011- Spring 2014 1971 K10 Stepside: SBC 350, TH 350 Transmission 6 inch Lift Kit 35'' tires SOLD 1970 K10 Parts Truck: SBC 350 for 1972, SM 465 Transmission |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ladysmith, WI
Posts: 641
|
Re: 1971 question
Ought to be able to do a little than 9 mpg, especially if its a C10 with relatively highway friendly gears. I get 11-13 or so with my C20 with the 4.57 rear end on the highway (60 mph, rarely gets on any highways with higher speed limits around here).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||
"I ain't nobody, dork."
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,978
|
Re: 1971 question
The 305 and 307 are different animals. The 305 has a smaller bore and crappy cylinder heads. The 307 can be built to be a decent engine for a truck.
MPG's in these old trucks is never gonna be that great with the old school engines. They were never designed to get good gas mileage in the first place. Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars... My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread. The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 6,334
|
Re: 1971 question
Isn't there a 305 V6 in that era? Everyone seems to be assuming its a small block chevy 305, but throwing it out there just in case...
__________________
1970 GMC Sierra Grande Custom Camper - Built, not Bought 1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Coupe 1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Convertible |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cedar Park, Texas
Posts: 7,500
|
Re: 1971 question
Quote:
The 307 has gotten a bad wrap. IMO and experience it is a good all around engine, better than a 305. Good power and mileage potential with sims hop up parts like any SBC, just don't go crazy with the cam lift/ duration. Posted via Mobile Device |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cedar Park, Texas
Posts: 7,500
|
Re: 1971 question
Be sire to check the gutter over doors and windshield. If the truck sat out a lot, the seam sealer cracks, letting water into the seam and into the cab. Since the cab is bare steel between the two layers, it rusts from onside out, just like outer rockers do.
Posted via Mobile Device |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cedar Park, Texas
Posts: 7,500
|
![]() Quote:
X2 Posted via Mobile Device |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|