Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-02-2012, 07:55 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 857
|
Drive by cable "not" check this out
I saw this yesterday at a car show. This car was actually built by a good friend of mine. The motor was actually a hemi take out of a dodge truck. The car was mid fifties Plymouth I think. I know this is a Chevy thread but could give us swappers some othe ideas to retain our stock throttle pedals but still use DBW. As you can see the dbw pedal was laid horizontally and the foot part was cut and he used a regular street rod style pedal with cable to attach to the pedal arm. It works perfect. What really impressed me about this was the pedal assembly didnt look out of place on the engine. Man this has really got me thinking about My next dbw swap. Let know what you all think.
Posted via Mobile Device |
09-03-2012, 01:59 AM | #2 |
meowMEOWmeowMEOW
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 7,128
|
Re: Drive by cable "not" check this out
Interesting idea, I can see it being useful for someone trying to retain a bone stock interior, or in a case where the gas pedal would really stick out.
I'd have a couple safety/function concerns tho. With it mounted facing up, I'd think that the pedal would have a tendancy to "jump" a little over rough surfaces or bumps...those dbw pedals are super touchy, but maybe if they increased the spring tension it wouldn't be a concern. The other would be that if the retention spring were to fail, the engine would run WOT. I like the thought tho, could be epspecially cool is something with NO legroom for the potentiometer assembly.
__________________
'66 Short Step / SD Tuned / Big Cam LQ4 / Backhalfed /Built 4l80e / #REBUILDEVERYTHING MY BUILD THE H8RDCPTR //\\ MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL REV J HD
|
09-03-2012, 09:30 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 857
|
Re: Drive by cable "not" check this out
Maybe a return spring would help for safety reasons.
Posted via Mobile Device |
09-03-2012, 07:16 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 6,370
|
Re: Drive by cable "not" check this out
A neat idea for sure! You can use the same idea inside the truck.
I personally wouldnt put the APPS on top of the engine, The heat & vibration isnt good on them. Cummins ISB 5.9L's in Dodge trucks have the APPS mounted to the engine & go out alot more than one mounted inside the truck. |
09-03-2012, 07:18 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Denison, Texas
Posts: 1,919
|
Re: Drive by cable "not" check this out
I've seen this done before, or at least something similar. They basically did the same thing, but mounted it above the stock pedal and tied the two together with a custom linkage.
__________________
1998 GMC Sierra SLE 1/2 ton 2WD 305 Vortec -Gibson Stainless Cat Back Swept Side -SS Wheels 2005 Honda CRF250R 2006 Honda CRF150F |
09-03-2012, 09:41 PM | #6 |
Truck and auto performance nut
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: McKinney,Texas
Posts: 3,848
|
Re: Drive by cable "not" check this out
great idea. I'd think the return spring on the pedal would be enough if the cable is working smoothly (especially if there's a return spring on the cab pedal assembly)... tho I'd want to have another spring in the picture, attached to that cable mounting plate and the DBW pedal arm
__________________
Kurt - '68 GMC short step - NIB '09 LY6 6.0L crate motor w/mods, NIB '12 crate 4L85e w/billet 3k stall Circle D, 3.73 posi 12 bolt, DynaTech f-swap headers, 3/4 drop, handling mods, etc. - my toy '72 Chevy LWB C-10 Highlander - 350/350 ps/pb/tilt/ac - not original but close '06 Chevy TrailBlazerSS - LS2/4L70e - little black hot rod SUV - my DD '18 Kia Sorento - wife's econo-driver '95 Chevy S10 - reg cab shortbed, LS, 4.3, auto... my '68's powertrain and chassis build -links broken A surprise phase - carb to efi -links broken |
Bookmarks |
|
|