The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-14-2013, 12:55 PM   #51
GASoline71
"I ain't nobody, dork."
 
GASoline71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,971
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaysonb View Post
I plan on putting in a cam this winter, and this has worried the heck out of me. My buddy just had 2 lobes go flat in about 200 miles, ruined a fresh big block in his trans am. What is the cost difference in going with a roller set up?
Posted via Mobile Device
You're going to drop about $250 on the cam, and about $300 on the retro-fit roller lifters. These prices are on the low end of the spectrum.

Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars...

My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread.

The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck

Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGHAIR View Post
I would never rebuild a 305.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
I love using vacuum gauges as part of the carb tuning process. I hook the gauge to the inside of my garbage can and leave it there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
Remember Murphys 2nd law of mechanical relationships... "OPPOSING COMPONENTS ATTEMPTING TO OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE, AT THE SAME TIME, GENERALLY END UP OCCUPYING ADJOINING SPACE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OIL PAN"
Quote:
Originally Posted by cableguy0 View Post
Its cheaper to listen to advice given when you ask for help than it is to ignore everyone and wait for carnage.
GASoline71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 01:49 PM   #52
prostreetC-10
My Carbon Footprint
 
prostreetC-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Orygun
Posts: 5,527
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

A lot of it does have to do with the core the cam is cut on.
prostreetC-10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 02:01 PM   #53
prostreetC-10
My Carbon Footprint
 
prostreetC-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Orygun
Posts: 5,527
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

Quote:
Originally Posted by GASoline71 View Post
You're going to drop about $250 on the cam, and about $300 on the retro-fit roller lifters. These prices are on the low end of the spectrum.

Gary
Very low end and you also have to factor in the correct springs. Hot rodding tends to have a snowball effect on your checking account. Just because one decides to go roller, that doesn't mean all your problems are over. Spring pressure is critical on a roller cam. Go too light and the lifter will bounce on the lobe. When your lifter bounces, so does your valve. Go too heavy and you'll ruin your lifter. You might have to address your dist gear. You might have to upgrade your timing cover so you can correctly set end play because that cam will want to walk. These are just some of the reasons why not every guy on this board is not running a roller.
prostreetC-10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 05:16 PM   #54
GASoline71
"I ain't nobody, dork."
 
GASoline71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,971
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

It sure does snowball... when I first got my '72, I was gonna be an intake and carb swap only... That turned into a $5,000 Small block!

Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars...

My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread.

The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck

Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGHAIR View Post
I would never rebuild a 305.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
I love using vacuum gauges as part of the carb tuning process. I hook the gauge to the inside of my garbage can and leave it there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
Remember Murphys 2nd law of mechanical relationships... "OPPOSING COMPONENTS ATTEMPTING TO OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE, AT THE SAME TIME, GENERALLY END UP OCCUPYING ADJOINING SPACE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OIL PAN"
Quote:
Originally Posted by cableguy0 View Post
Its cheaper to listen to advice given when you ask for help than it is to ignore everyone and wait for carnage.
GASoline71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 05:38 PM   #55
BigRed76
Registered User
 
BigRed76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 1,921
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
Very low end and you also have to factor in the correct springs. Hot rodding tends to have a snowball effect on your checking account. Just because one decides to go roller, that doesn't mean all your problems are over. Spring pressure is critical on a roller cam. Go too light and the lifter will bounce on the lobe. When your lifter bounces, so does your valve. Go too heavy and you'll ruin your lifter. You might have to address your dist gear. You might have to upgrade your timing cover so you can correctly set end play because that cam will want to walk. These are just some of the reasons why not every guy on this board is not running a roller.
Any references for correct spring pressures for roller setups?

Or should this be left to a machine shop?
__________________
Zach

1970 Chevrolet Custom Camper K20
1971 GMC Super K2500, 12V/NV4500 swap in progress
1971 Chevrolet Custom C10
1972 Chevrolet Custom Deluxe C20, 5.3/4L60E
1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme, 455/TH400, 3.73 posi
2004 GMC Sierra 2500HD, LB7/Allison, CCSB
2005 GMC Sierra 1500, 5.3/4L60E, CCSB

BigRed76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 06:27 PM   #56
prostreetC-10
My Carbon Footprint
 
prostreetC-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Orygun
Posts: 5,527
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

I certainly wouldn't leave it up to the machine shop. I'd leave it to the cam people. It can get a little tricky. A SADI core can take a lot of pressure but not as much as a steel billet. Then you have the lifter. Is it the enclosed .700 wheel or an open .750 wheel. My lifters are Morels that run about $600 by themselves. Solid rollers take a way more pressure than a hydro. My hydro roller has 170 seat and 485 open pressure. You try to run that on an enclosed lifter and you will probably kill it over time. It's a decent size cam at 248/262 @ .050 and .665/.612 lift. A lot of these shelf cams will see 140 seat and 350-400 open pressure. Other things come into play as well like installed height. The same spring can vary depending on what height the valve is.

To clarify: To me you have machine shops and then you have engine builders that also run a machine shop. The guy that's doing my 496 machine work is Gray's Racing Engines in Tigard, Or. I am driving 3.5 hrs away for him to do my work and there is a NAPA machine shop about 1 mile from my home. Make sense??
prostreetC-10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 06:56 PM   #57
LEEVON
Moderator
 
LEEVON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ozark, MO
Posts: 4,893
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

I read a very convincing somewhere from a guy who had direct dealings with cam suppliers and the manufacturing side pointed the finger at poor quality and in particular a very large and very bad supply of lifters from a major source. These things could have been made years ago and are still being sold. I've heard the ZDDP story again and again, which makes sense when your talking thousands of miles or the total life of an engine. But it seems like in the last few years you can do everything right and destroy a cam on break-in, even with break-in lube and oil. That can't be the result of simply a missing additive, but poor quality parts. Metals aren't what they used to be across the board, cam and lifter manufacturers are not immune. My money is that Comp and others know this all too well.
__________________
'86 GMC C30 Crew ~ '86 C20 Crew ~ '79 K15 Sierra Grande ~ '76 Blazer 2wd ~ '74K10 ~ '71 Cheyenne swb ~'50 3100 bagged ~ '80 Wife ~ Late model kids
LEEVON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 06:58 PM   #58
prostreetC-10
My Carbon Footprint
 
prostreetC-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Orygun
Posts: 5,527
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

You certainly need to at least hit up who you got the cam from and try to get your money back. Even if it's $150....that's a start.
prostreetC-10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 07:13 PM   #59
Eddie H.
Registered User
 
Eddie H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Paradise TX USA
Posts: 1,200
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

Quote:
Originally Posted by LEEVON View Post
I read a very convincing somewhere from a guy who had direct dealings with cam suppliers and the manufacturing side pointed the finger at poor quality and in particular a very large and very bad supply of lifters from a major source. These things could have been made years ago and are still being sold. I've heard the ZDDP story again and again, which makes sense when your talking thousands of miles or the total life of an engine. But it seems like in the last few years you can do everything right and destroy a cam on break-in, even with break-in lube and oil. That can't be the result of simply a missing additive, but poor quality parts. Metals aren't what they used to be across the board, cam and lifter manufacturers are not immune. My money is that Comp and others know this all too well.
I agree completely. It is more of a quality control issue than an oil additive, or break in issue. If a cam manufacturer uses high quality cores, grinds and hardens them correctly, the chances of lobe failure are minimal. I remember in the old days, everybody ran flat tappets, and nobody seemed to worry about proper break in procedures or special additives. We would throw in a new cam and lifters, fire it up and go, but that was when steel was made in the USA instead of imported from China.
__________________
"Negative people always seem to have a problem for every solution"
Eddie H. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 08:47 PM   #60
Horsman
Registered User
 
Horsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: North Texas
Posts: 118
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eddie H. View Post
I agree completely. It is more of a quality control issue than an oil additive, or break in issue. If a cam manufacturer uses high quality cores, grinds and hardens them correctly, the chances of lobe failure are minimal. I remember in the old days, everybody ran flat tappets, and nobody seemed to worry about proper break in procedures or special additives. We would throw in a new cam and lifters, fire it up and go, but that was when steel was made in the USA instead of imported from China.
You hit the nail on the head...CHINA.
__________________
Jeff Horsman
1972 C20 Highlander "C"
1966 Olds 442 L69 four speed
1971 Skylark (GS clone racecar) 494 stroker
1986 Buick T-Type
Horsman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 03:52 PM   #61
tipshep
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 14
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

I had similar probs with my 327. Big Blocks are more prone to cam lobe problems. I use Brad Penn, works. I know there is a coating company out there that will apply a coating, they say you don't even have to do a break in (additve, nothing under 1500 rpm for 20-30 min) and will warranty your cam and lifters.Saw a blurb in Hot Rod, or Pop. Hot Rodding, should be able to google cam coatings, anyway, much cheaper than a roller.
tipshep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 04:44 PM   #62
GASoline71
"I ain't nobody, dork."
 
GASoline71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,971
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

I think it's across he board... not more prone to Big Blocks. It's not just Chevy's that are having the flat cams either. All engines... running flat tappets.

Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars...

My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread.

The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck

Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGHAIR View Post
I would never rebuild a 305.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
I love using vacuum gauges as part of the carb tuning process. I hook the gauge to the inside of my garbage can and leave it there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
Remember Murphys 2nd law of mechanical relationships... "OPPOSING COMPONENTS ATTEMPTING TO OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE, AT THE SAME TIME, GENERALLY END UP OCCUPYING ADJOINING SPACE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OIL PAN"
Quote:
Originally Posted by cableguy0 View Post
Its cheaper to listen to advice given when you ask for help than it is to ignore everyone and wait for carnage.
GASoline71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 09:15 PM   #63
SSC's76
No No
 
SSC's76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pueblo Colorado
Posts: 1,781
I wont buy another comp product. I've only had one cam ever go flat and it was a comp 268 xe in a sb. broken in per directions and lash was checked after break in. the engine made it 700 miles and 3 lobes were trashed. I've never had a problem with a cam before or after that of course I never used a comp cam after that either


Posted from 67-72chevytrucks.com App for Android
__________________
1976 Custom Deluxe SWB Med FMB.3/4 Drop.
Gen VI 454, Muncie HD 3 speed With Modified OE Hurst Shifter, 3.73 12 bolt, GMPP HO roller cam, Hooker headers, Performer intake with modified Q-jet, Accel distributor. Best 1/4 12.3 @108. Funnest run 19.84 @88 full 1/4 mile burn out.
1997 K1500 ext cab 5.7 stock except muffler
SSC's76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 09:16 PM   #64
SSC's76
No No
 
SSC's76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pueblo Colorado
Posts: 1,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSC's76
I wont buy another comp product. I've only had one cam ever go flat and it was a comp 268 xe in a sb. broken in per directions and lash was checked after break in. the engine made it 700 miles and 3 lobes were trashed. I've never had a problem with a cam before or after that of course I never used a comp cam after that either


Posted from 67-72chevytrucks.com App for Android
forgot to mention comp ate that one


Posted from 67-72chevytrucks.com App for Android
__________________
1976 Custom Deluxe SWB Med FMB.3/4 Drop.
Gen VI 454, Muncie HD 3 speed With Modified OE Hurst Shifter, 3.73 12 bolt, GMPP HO roller cam, Hooker headers, Performer intake with modified Q-jet, Accel distributor. Best 1/4 12.3 @108. Funnest run 19.84 @88 full 1/4 mile burn out.
1997 K1500 ext cab 5.7 stock except muffler
SSC's76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 09:18 PM   #65
prostreetC-10
My Carbon Footprint
 
prostreetC-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Orygun
Posts: 5,527
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSC's76 View Post
I wont buy another comp product.
Posted from 67-72chevytrucks.com App for Android
It's interesting that the general public loves them and yet real race engine builders won't touch their stuff. Hmmm.....master marketers??

My comment is from actual builders telling me this....not hearsay.
prostreetC-10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013, 12:59 AM   #66
GASoline71
"I ain't nobody, dork."
 
GASoline71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,971
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

All the good race engine guys I know won't use any Comp products.

Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars...

My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread.

The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck

Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGHAIR View Post
I would never rebuild a 305.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
I love using vacuum gauges as part of the carb tuning process. I hook the gauge to the inside of my garbage can and leave it there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
Remember Murphys 2nd law of mechanical relationships... "OPPOSING COMPONENTS ATTEMPTING TO OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE, AT THE SAME TIME, GENERALLY END UP OCCUPYING ADJOINING SPACE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OIL PAN"
Quote:
Originally Posted by cableguy0 View Post
Its cheaper to listen to advice given when you ask for help than it is to ignore everyone and wait for carnage.
GASoline71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013, 09:12 AM   #67
Eddie H.
Registered User
 
Eddie H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Paradise TX USA
Posts: 1,200
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

"Good marketing". That pretty much explains it. Unfortunately, it is very easy to sell an inferior product in mass quanity to an unsuspecting public, as long as you have good marketing.
Some other names readily come to mind such as "split fire sparkplug "TheTornado" various bogus "fuel mileage boosters", a multitude of "snake oil" additives, and the list goes on.
__________________
"Negative people always seem to have a problem for every solution"
Eddie H. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013, 10:46 AM   #68
prostreetC-10
My Carbon Footprint
 
prostreetC-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Orygun
Posts: 5,527
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

Just look at all they have to offer VS the other guys!

http://www.jegs.com/c/Cams-Valvetrai...10707/10002/-1

I heard they are working on some other really innovative cam products such as:

The XR "lawn shredder" for Briggs and Stratton

The Magnum "massive driver" for golf carts

Also the "compress this beotch thumpr" for upright air compressors.
prostreetC-10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013, 01:02 PM   #69
GASoline71
"I ain't nobody, dork."
 
GASoline71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,971
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

LMAO!

Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars...

My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread.

The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck

Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGHAIR View Post
I would never rebuild a 305.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
I love using vacuum gauges as part of the carb tuning process. I hook the gauge to the inside of my garbage can and leave it there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
Remember Murphys 2nd law of mechanical relationships... "OPPOSING COMPONENTS ATTEMPTING TO OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE, AT THE SAME TIME, GENERALLY END UP OCCUPYING ADJOINING SPACE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OIL PAN"
Quote:
Originally Posted by cableguy0 View Post
Its cheaper to listen to advice given when you ask for help than it is to ignore everyone and wait for carnage.
GASoline71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 08:40 PM   #70
SSC's76
No No
 
SSC's76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pueblo Colorado
Posts: 1,781
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
It's interesting that the general public loves them and yet real race engine builders won't touch their stuff. Hmmm.....master marketers??

My comment is from actual builders telling me this....not hearsay.
I'm not sure if it makes a difference but that issue happend when I had the shop. Comp tends to take things a little different when you say you are calling from a shop and they are dealing with an actual mechanic. Im not sure if they think your going to go after them for a new engine or just a cam and labor. I was so unhappy with this product but all i wanted the customers money back for the cam and lifters. I can say the pushrods were ok I did re use those and they were comp. All I know for sure is I have never had an issue with a crower, isky or a melling cam.
__________________
1976 Custom Deluxe SWB Med FMB.3/4 Drop.
Gen VI 454, Muncie HD 3 speed With Modified OE Hurst Shifter, 3.73 12 bolt, GMPP HO roller cam, Hooker headers, Performer intake with modified Q-jet, Accel distributor. Best 1/4 12.3 @108. Funnest run 19.84 @88 full 1/4 mile burn out.
1997 K1500 ext cab 5.7 stock except muffler
SSC's76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 09:10 PM   #71
prostreetC-10
My Carbon Footprint
 
prostreetC-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Orygun
Posts: 5,527
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

My cam is a Bullet Cam.
prostreetC-10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 06:51 PM   #72
Horsman
Registered User
 
Horsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: North Texas
Posts: 118
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam - UPDATE

Well, I was wrong...cam is not flat and the lifter appears fine.

See the pics...the pushrod end at the top is mushrooming, the opposite end at the lifter side is normal, ball shaped. This is why I kept having to adjust the #4 intake valve twice in 560 miles.

Now here's the dilemma...do I replace all the pushrods with some new hardened heavy duty ones and move on down the road or completely disassemble and start from scratch again? (See the chunks I found in the head, also some smaller ones found in lifter valley, see pic)

The pushrod just forward of this one looks suspect also, like it is starting to do the same. Part failure or something else going on?
Attached Images
   
__________________
Jeff Horsman
1972 C20 Highlander "C"
1966 Olds 442 L69 four speed
1971 Skylark (GS clone racecar) 494 stroker
1986 Buick T-Type
Horsman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 08:34 PM   #73
LONGHAIR
just can't cover up my redneck
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

Wow, I haven't seen that in a while...and never in 500 miles. What kind of rockers?
BTW, I would always up-grade the pushrods on a BBC, the geometry/angularity is a bit quirky
__________________
You can review the site's rules here.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Longhorn Man View Post
As for reading directions...
The directions are nothing but another man's opinion.
Learn from the mistakes of others, you won't live long enough to make them all yourself...

Bad planning on your part does not necessarily constitute an instant emergency on my part....

The great thing about being a pessimist is that you are either pleasantly surprised or right.
LONGHAIR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 09:05 PM   #74
Horsman
Registered User
 
Horsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: North Texas
Posts: 118
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

Comp Magnum rockers with the roller tip.

The pushrods cam from Comp also.

Any ideas?
__________________
Jeff Horsman
1972 C20 Highlander "C"
1966 Olds 442 L69 four speed
1971 Skylark (GS clone racecar) 494 stroker
1986 Buick T-Type
Horsman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 12:18 AM   #75
Eddie H.
Registered User
 
Eddie H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Paradise TX USA
Posts: 1,200
Re: Totally disgusted - flat cam

It looks like their pushrods are no better than their cams. (Probably made in the same Chinese factory).
I would suggest cutting open your oil filter and inspecting for metal before going any further. If it is clean, change the oil, install a magnetic drain plug to catch whatever chunks might find still their way into the pan, new push rods, and drive it.
__________________
"Negative people always seem to have a problem for every solution"
Eddie H. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com