The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-05-2013, 12:26 AM   #1
bigd65
Registered User
 
bigd65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Clute, TX.
Posts: 1,935
Driveshaft opinion

Ok my 85 LWB had a one piece driveshaft. My 87 I have now, has a two piece driveshaft. What's the favorite. Proc and cons of both ????

I was wondering because when I had the 85, I always thought the two piece would be stronger but never converted because I didn't have a problem. With this 87, I was just wondering if that is the case or not.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
2004 Silverado Crewcab
1972 Chevy Monte Carlo
2017 Chevy Tahoe
bigd65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 12:35 AM   #2
INSIDIOUS '86
Registered User
 
INSIDIOUS '86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: washington
Posts: 4,178
Re: Driveshaft opinion

The one piece is desirable since it is more durable and less maintenance. Two piece driveshafts were for heavy duty trucks that could reach higher speeds with the bigger engines they had so two peice was don't to keep down critical speed ( the speed in which your shaft turns into a jump rope).

The longer the driveshaft the lower the critical speed, the bigger the tube the higher the critical speed.

Say I put 5:11 gears in a long bed crew truck with a long driveshaft and proceed to drive as fast as possible on the highway. Well you would see some serious sh!t!

The weakness of the two piece is that two peices are not as stable at high speed anyways and the carrier bearings can't hold much.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
377 sbc thumpr cam autogear m23 muncie 3:73 Detroit trutrac
3''spintech prostreet mufflers xpipe 1 3/4 headers
build thread !http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=577217
Iroc gauge threadhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=554511
INSIDIOUS '86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 12:40 AM   #3
Ziegelsteinfaust
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,631
Re: Driveshaft opinion

1 piece is cheaper, and if the drive shaft is light enough just fine for everyday use.

The 2 piece is stronger because the suspended section of the drive shaft is shorter, and it is less likely to get bent from use. That is why I have never seen a 1 piece on a 3/4 ton myself.
Ziegelsteinfaust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 08:35 AM   #4
bigd65
Registered User
 
bigd65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Clute, TX.
Posts: 1,935
Re: Driveshaft opinion

I'm thinking about looking for a one piece... Guess I could check Suburbans .... They seam to be more available in wrecking yards these days
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
2004 Silverado Crewcab
1972 Chevy Monte Carlo
2017 Chevy Tahoe
bigd65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 08:45 AM   #5
Keith Seymore
Registered User
 
Keith Seymore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,226
Re: Driveshaft opinion

Quote:
Originally Posted by INSIDIOUS '86 View Post
The one piece is desirable since it is more durable and less maintenance. Two piece driveshafts were for heavy duty trucks that could reach higher speeds with the bigger engines they had so two peice was don't to keep down critical speed ( the speed in which your shaft turns into a jump rope).

The longer the driveshaft the lower the critical speed, the bigger the tube the higher the critical speed.

Say I put 5:11 gears in a long bed crew truck with a long driveshaft and proceed to drive as fast as possible on the highway. Well you would see some serious sh!t!

The weakness of the two piece is that two peices are not as stable at high speed anyways and the carrier bearings can't hold much.
Posted via Mobile Device
Agree -

Here are the words I used in a previous post (to say essentially the same thing):

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Seymore View Post
It has to do with propshaft (aka "driveshaft") critical speed.

What you guys might be missing is that propshaft critical speed not just based on wheelbase but is also based on trans type (length), rear axle ratio, tire size, and engine type (larger engines allowing a higher top speed) AND/OR any strange resonances in that particular combination (camping out on that resonance will break the trans/transfer case tailshaft housing).

So - a long wheelbase truck with a low (numerical) rear axle ratio spins the shaft slower and might get a one piece, but an otherwise comparable truck with a high rear axle ratio might get a two piece.

One other comment - critical speed is not directly related to balance, but rigidity. When the shaft exceeds it's critical speed it begins to bow in the middle and swing like a jump rope. Hence the disturbance and durability concerns.

You can get around it by going to a larger diameter steel tube - or more expensive alternative materials like aluminum, carbon fiber or "metal matrix" (an aluminum/carbon wrap).

So - on the two 350 trucks - there could have been a tire difference that put it over the edge, or perhaps a different horsepower rating which would allow for a higher top speed. I can assure you there was something different there that is not obvious to us after the fact.

By the way, I hate the complexity and mass of a two piece setup and go out of my way to order my trucks such that they get a one piece shaft.

K



K
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly
1979-1986
GM Full Size Truck Engineering
1986 - 2019
Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926
My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/
Keith Seymore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 09:10 AM   #6
88Jimmy4x4
Registered User
 
88Jimmy4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: houston, texas
Posts: 1,974
Re: Driveshaft opinion

My 1976 Swb 1500 heavy half had 2 piece driveshaft but I switched to one piece during my restoration
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
2008 Silverado Z71 RCSB
1991 GMC Jimmy 4x4
1976 GMC Sierra C15 SWB
88Jimmy4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 09:36 PM   #7
James McClure
One shot, one kill.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs NY
Posts: 859
Re: Driveshaft opinion

Mine is an 84 K20 long box with a 1 piece prop, 465 trans and 3:08 gears. On the other hand, I have an 84 S10 that had a 2 piece prop with (I think 3:73 gears) 4 speed manual trans and a small 4cyl eng (2.2L??). Anyway, the 2 piece lost the center bearing and the owner tried to replace it himself and bent the drive spline part of the front shaft. No luck in the bone yard so I tried to get a new one, again no luck, so I got hold of a company here in NY that makes them $1200. NO THANKS very much. Searched the net and found a CO. in OK that made a 1 piece for me for just over $200.
Price was the deciding factor. I'll go back to them if I ever need another shaft.
__________________
1984 K20 350M engine with 465,000 miles. Well, it's finally done!! Almost 2 years of work, but it was really worth the effort. Little stuff left to do is mount winch, wet sand & buff out and build belly pan\running boards. Body work takes lots and LOTS of beer!!!! God, Guts and Guns made America and God, Guts and Guns will preserve it! The worst thing you could do is get into my sights, but that don't matter, you'll never know it, cause you'll never hear the shotJim or Paladin whichever you choose.
James McClure is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com