The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-26-2015, 03:04 PM   #1
penjak
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: los angeles, ca
Posts: 11
This or that??

I have the option of putting a little time,money & effort into either a 63 chevy shorted small window straight 6 or a 60 gmc longbed, big window v6. Both engines run and body in similar conditions. Which is more valuable / collectible?
Posted via Mobile Device
penjak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2015, 04:38 PM   #2
jonzcustomshop
1961 crewcab
 
jonzcustomshop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: missoula, mt
Posts: 6,164
Re: This or that??

put the bbw in the chevy short bed, that would be the best option.
neither will get you more money than you will put into them, so be aware of that...

but I would say in a popularity contest, chev over gmc, short over long, and big back window over small...

and then if it was me for myself, I would build the gmc!
jonzcustomshop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2015, 05:03 PM   #3
TwoFiftyShifter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Gwinnett GA
Posts: 1,803
Re: This or that??

Personally, long bed fleet with a big window is very classy looking. Otherwise, I prefer short beds.
__________________
1982 K10 SWB
1987 V20 - Sold - Doh!
TwoFiftyShifter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2015, 05:43 PM   #4
penjak
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: los angeles, ca
Posts: 11
Re: This or that??

I'm on the same page with the "popularity " list... was thinking that the 60 gmc might be little more desirable being that it was first truck to come out with the V6. IF I was to put the shorted on the big window cab then I would be stuck with a longbed, small window & have to eat the cost cuz I'm thinking not much desirability it that combo
Posted via Mobile Device
penjak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2015, 10:34 PM   #5
TJ's Chevy
Registered User
 
TJ's Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 10,384
Re: This or that??

If you keep the V6 in the GMC get it...if your gonna swap out to a V8...get the chevy. lol Alot of GMC guys don't take to well with V8's in the places of the big V6. And since most guys have V8's in there chevys its not bad at all. lol To keep the straight 6 is rare...but for the GMC guys...to swap out a V6 to a V8 is heresy. And in a way I agree...the V6 is a great engine and its a shame to see them dumped in scrap yards or left out to rust. I have a 64 GMC 1500 lwb with a 305E/SM420. No other engine I would rather have in there....except a bigger V6. Thing pulls a load better than any small block I have driven. I can go down to 15 miles an hour in 4th gear and pull right out. The 4.10's help alot with that to. I've pulled loads of manure up hills in 4th gear at 55 mph at 1/4 throttle. Thing runs Better loaded then it does unloaded. lol

But TO the point....My preference would be the GMC. That was the 1st year for the V6 being the 305A. A 305E manifold will bolt right in place and some little mods can be done to these beast to let out their true temper.

If I was to get the Chevy...pending on what inline 6 it had in it. I would either have some fun with the inline(like I'm known for) or swap in a out of the ordinary V8....like a 283 or 327....maybe even a 400...or even better a 572. lol But ultimately its YOUR decision. You buy whichever truck you like best! YOU do what you want with it!
__________________
1966 Chevy C10 "Project Two Tone" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=596643
1964 GMC "Crustine" semi-build:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=665056
My youtube channel. Username "Military Chevy": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_h...fzpcUXyK_5-uiw
TJ's Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2015, 12:22 AM   #6
jbgroby
Registered User
 
jbgroby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Lacombe, LA
Posts: 2,772
Re: This or that??

Keep the V-6, how many others with a v-6 are in your area? It's nice to stand out from the crowd!
jbgroby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2015, 09:01 AM   #7
penjak
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: los angeles, ca
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgroby View Post
Keep the V-6, how many others with a v-6 are in your area? It's nice to stand out from the crowd!
Posted via Mobile Device
penjak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2015, 09:10 AM   #8
penjak
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: los angeles, ca
Posts: 11
Re: This or that??

Yeah, it's going to be a joint project & in think my buddy & I are both leaning towards the gmc. The big back window is playing the biggest part on our decision making. Just for poops and chuckles, in a restored " auction " quality condition, numbers matching, bla bla bla, which would be more valuable? The Chevy or Gmc?
Posted via Mobile Device
penjak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2015, 10:20 AM   #9
TJ's Chevy
Registered User
 
TJ's Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 10,384
Re: This or that??

Quote:
Originally Posted by penjak View Post
Yeah, it's going to be a joint project & in think my buddy & I are both leaning towards the gmc. The big back window is playing the biggest part on our decision making. Just for poops and chuckles, in a restored " auction " quality condition, numbers matching, bla bla bla, which would be more valuable? The Chevy or Gmc?
Posted via Mobile Device
The GMC.
__________________
1966 Chevy C10 "Project Two Tone" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=596643
1964 GMC "Crustine" semi-build:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=665056
My youtube channel. Username "Military Chevy": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_h...fzpcUXyK_5-uiw
TJ's Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2015, 12:15 PM   #10
penjak
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: los angeles, ca
Posts: 11
Re: This or that??

What I thought. . Thanks
Posted via Mobile Device
penjak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2015, 12:15 PM   #11
penjak
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: los angeles, ca
Posts: 11
Re: This or that??

Looks like I might be posting a 63 short bed for sale in the marketmarketplace pretty soon then.
Posted via Mobile Device
penjak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2015, 01:56 PM   #12
cooperhw
Registered User
 
cooperhw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Mesa AZ (Near Phoenix)
Posts: 2,302
Re: This or that??

My .02 cents is to do the short bed. Having sold a few trucks over the years the shorts will sell much faster than the long beds. And as to the V6. Probably 50 guys will want to buy one with a small block chevy over someone who wants that old boat anchor.
JMO
__________________
"Life is too short to drive a boring vehicle".
Later,
Wayne
cooperhw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2015, 05:33 PM   #13
TJ's Chevy
Registered User
 
TJ's Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 10,384
Re: This or that??

Quote:
Originally Posted by cooperhw View Post
that old boat anchor.
JMO
How's the V6 a "boat anchor" when they were put in semi trucks back in the day? lol
__________________
1966 Chevy C10 "Project Two Tone" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=596643
1964 GMC "Crustine" semi-build:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=665056
My youtube channel. Username "Military Chevy": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_h...fzpcUXyK_5-uiw
TJ's Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com