The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-18-2015, 11:28 AM   #1
sneakyfast
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: charlotte NC
Posts: 63
Does this sound right?

Guys....let me apologize in advance for the dumb question as I am relatively new to the old and performance truck game.

I have a 1973 with a 383 stroker engine at the mechanics getting some carburetor work done. The mechanic sounds pretty knowledgeable about them but he made a comment to me that didn't sound right.

I told him that I recently was on the interstate and at those speeds was running around 3900 - 4000 rpm. He mentioned that I would damage the motor if I had any sustained running of the engine above 3200 rpm. He said no problem blasting up to 6000 rpm but that the problem was that sustained rpm.

Does that sound right? I have never heard of any engine that was below red line having damage due to sustained rpm.
sneakyfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2015, 02:50 PM   #2
Blessed66
Registered User
 
Blessed66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 217
Re: Does this sound right?

Can't say it makes much sense to me. Doesn't mean he's incapable of building a solid engine, just that he might be wrong on a rather minor detail.
__________________
Current Projects:
1984 GMC, LWB Fleetside, 305/350 - Currently Doing TBI Conversion
1966 GMC, SWB Stepside, 350/200-4R - Currently waiting patiently.
Blessed66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2015, 03:35 PM   #3
sneakyfast
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: charlotte NC
Posts: 63
Re: Does this sound right?

For clarity, he didn't build the engine but was commenting on it. I always thought that the very definition of redline was that an engine could run safely at anything below it. I just can't imagine what would fail or be stressed.
sneakyfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2015, 04:35 PM   #4
slotard
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 877
Re: Does this sound right?

The faster you spin it the more wear you get. I wouldn't expect anything catastrophic, but spinning 4k is going to wear everything out significantly faster than 3k and will also guzzle gas. The extra stroke your 383 has means it enjoys high RPM less than a 350, which doesn't rev as high as a 327, which doesn't rev as high as a 302.

When it comes to a non-stock engine, it's hard to define redline. There is a difference between what RPM is ok to hit on a drag strip and what RPM is ok to sit at towing a trailer up a long hill.
__________________
1973 C20, 350/350
slotard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2015, 06:33 PM   #5
Blessed66
Registered User
 
Blessed66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 217
Re: Does this sound right?

Mean Piston Speed

Post #16 here.

There is a method of determining redline, besides the above, that references head, intake and/or cam limitations on a dyno. A whole bunch of little details all add up to put a near-exact number for near-any engine.
__________________
Current Projects:
1984 GMC, LWB Fleetside, 305/350 - Currently Doing TBI Conversion
1966 GMC, SWB Stepside, 350/200-4R - Currently waiting patiently.
Blessed66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2015, 06:37 PM   #6
Blessed66
Registered User
 
Blessed66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 217
Re: Does this sound right?

However, there are dozens of factors that can determine wear. Desnity of molecules (i.e. Why German blocks show less wear than american blocks), tolerances of the assembly, type of engine oil (low-ZDDP oil in older engines tends to be a hot debate), how you (the owner) drive and maintain your vehicle, etc.

In a perfect world, I'd love to tear down my engines at 50k to check how much wear has actually occured. However, until there's a "problem," I highly doubt many people would bother doing that.
__________________
Current Projects:
1984 GMC, LWB Fleetside, 305/350 - Currently Doing TBI Conversion
1966 GMC, SWB Stepside, 350/200-4R - Currently waiting patiently.
Blessed66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2015, 09:33 PM   #7
Jake Wade
Registered User
 
Jake Wade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 711
Re: Does this sound right?

You could really use an overdrive.
Jake Wade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2015, 10:25 PM   #8
nvrenuf
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mobile, Al
Posts: 92
Re: Does this sound right?

Gear ratio??
__________________
John

'91 Blazer, full top, bbc, 4spd, Doubler, 1 tons, 40's
nvrenuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2015, 11:35 PM   #9
slotard
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 877
Re: Does this sound right?

TH350 or TH400 with 4.56 could certainly lead to those rpms at reasonable speeds with fairly small tires.
__________________
1973 C20, 350/350
slotard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 10:40 AM   #10
cadillac_al
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,376
Re: Does this sound right?

It might take it but it will wear out faster.
__________________
76 Chevy K20
76 GMC K15
77 Chevy C10
77 Chevy K10
cadillac_al is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 03:14 PM   #11
Blessed66
Registered User
 
Blessed66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 217
Re: Does this sound right?

OP is concerned with damage, I believe. Wear and damage are not the same thing.
__________________
Current Projects:
1984 GMC, LWB Fleetside, 305/350 - Currently Doing TBI Conversion
1966 GMC, SWB Stepside, 350/200-4R - Currently waiting patiently.
Blessed66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2015, 10:05 AM   #12
sneakyfast
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: charlotte NC
Posts: 63
Re: Does this sound right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blessed66 View Post
OP is concerned with damage, I believe. Wear and damage are not the same thing.
Yes correct about the damage concern. Wear I don't think can be avoided but I don't want to damage the engine if I take a 20 minute drive on the interstate. That's why it sounded so strange as I can't imagine what damage it would do.

Anyway, yes I am running a TH350 and 4.11 gears and could really use an overdrive.
sneakyfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2015, 11:26 AM   #13
slotard
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 877
Re: Does this sound right?

I'd be very surprised at catastrophic failure, but it might mean the engine lasts 50k rather than double that.

Another option that would help is looking for a 3.73 rear end to replace the 4.11, I've had my eyes open for one for a while for the same reason (although I have a 350 rather than a 383, so the rings are happy at higher rpm).
__________________
1973 C20, 350/350
slotard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2015, 11:50 AM   #14
sneakyfast
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: charlotte NC
Posts: 63
Re: Does this sound right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by slotard View Post
I'd be very surprised at catastrophic failure, but it might mean the engine lasts 50k rather than double that.

Another option that would help is looking for a 3.73 rear end to replace the 4.11, I've had my eyes open for one for a while for the same reason (although I have a 350 rather than a 383, so the rings are happy at higher rpm).
Yes I've thought about the same...but man that pop off the line is addictive.
sneakyfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2015, 12:55 PM   #15
Blessed66
Registered User
 
Blessed66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 217
Re: Does this sound right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sneakyfast View Post
Yes I've thought about the same...but man that pop off the line is addictive.
It is.

But there are some considerations to think about. I'd be more of an advocate for a higher stall converter over steep gears, honestly.
__________________
Current Projects:
1984 GMC, LWB Fleetside, 305/350 - Currently Doing TBI Conversion
1966 GMC, SWB Stepside, 350/200-4R - Currently waiting patiently.
Blessed66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2015, 01:21 PM   #16
slotard
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 877
Re: Does this sound right?

My '73 also has 4.10s and I'd love to have taller gearing, my engine is just a truck motor and doesn't seem to enjoy sustained high RPM. Sure, it'll do it, but it sure does scream. It's kinda fun to be able to burn rubber all day even with a utility bed full of tools though.

Another option would be to swap to an overdrive trans - if you have a 700R4 now you wouldn't lose much going to a TH350.
__________________
1973 C20, 350/350
slotard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com