Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-06-2007, 10:55 AM | #11 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tyler, TX
Posts: 30
|
Re: Dropping my '64 stepside without messing with the suspension...
Quote:
I'm with ya on that long term stuff... I lowered my first square body back in 1985/1986. I've heated springs, cut springs, used 4 cylinder or 6 cylinder springs in V8 cars, used aftermarket springs, etc... I may not have chosen the correct words when I said it messes up the suspension geometry - not that an allignment can't bring the caster/camber/toe in back into the right settings, but it does cause you to have a more limited range of adjustment, and the biggie for me is that lowering with springs causes the vehicle to have a limited amount of travel in the suspension. Removing the bump stop does increase this but it is a work-around, a band-aid type of adjustment. I know that you can get an excellent ride with a good spring/shock combination. Many things are adustable. My thoughts with this were to drop the truck and retain factory suspension completely. Sort of a best of both worlds scenario. There are compromises elsewhere that I have to deal with though. I am not saying this is the best option for everyone, or even many people at all. But for some in certain situations, this is the best answer. I would like to get a squishier ride in the rear still. It is really bouncy like it is. I am hoping that adding the fuel tank behind the rear wheels will help that some. I think that what you are advising your customers to do is probably right on for them in their situations, and it would be for me in a different situation also. BTW, I have front springs off of a 1988 Suburban (still square body) with somewhere around 1 coil removed - did that to bring the front down so it was not higher than the rear several months back. So that was my starting point with this one. |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|