Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-10-2016, 03:20 PM | #26 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 6,334
|
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters
Quote:
- Carb'd car with a cat ('75 Monte factory) - Carb'd truck with no cat ('70 GMC) - EFI car with no cat ('69 Camaro ZZ502 BS3 Sequential EFI) The EFI car still smells like raw gas. It runs at about 14.6:1, but to get near stoich at idle with a cam in a motor like these requires a lot of extra fuel that winds up getting in your girlfriend's hair. Now a poorly tuned car with cats will stink like sulfur dioxide, so there's no substitute for properly tuning the thing. But properly tuned, cats get rid of the raw fuel smell. Maybe if gasoline still smelled like it did in 1970 I'd be OK with it, but it doesn't.
__________________
1970 GMC Sierra Grande Custom Camper - Built, not Bought 1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Coupe 1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Convertible |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|