Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-01-2020, 10:19 PM | #13 |
Weekend Warrior
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 1,787
|
Re: How about some pics of Static Dropped C-10's
Thanks for the responses guys. If Bagging it doesn't really achive better results unless you use AM front xmember etc, then Im perfectly fine with static.
I understand that the lower you go the more you comprise in ride quality, but I'm still slighlty confused I guess. I see alot of guys running 5/7 and seem to be ok, but who knows for sure. I had a 69 shorty step about 15 years ago with just a ece 2/4. It handled good, just still looked high lol. Problem fo me is, the look that I like is this pickup. I messaged the owner...6/8 static and claims it rides good. I guess ride quality is all relative to whos driving.
__________________
-'07 GMC Sierra K2500HD -'66 C10 Suburban -'68/'71 K20 Service Bed Project -'69 Chevy C30 Mason Dump -'33Ford P/U 396ChevyPowered |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|